78 research outputs found

    Effect of Nanoparticle with VEGF in Mouse Ischemic Hindlimb Model

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the factors regulating angiogenesis. For angiogenesis, the local concentration of VEGF has to be maintained. Because of its short half-life, VEGF has been conjugated with nanoparticles. Some nanoparticles, such as poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)) or polyethylenimine (PEI) are commonly used in this field, but have weak points such as faster release than expected and cell toxicity. We investigated the effect of core/shell nanoparticles including lecithin lipid cores in the ischemic hindlimb model. Methods: Mice were anesthetized and a region of the common femoral artery and vein was ligated and excised. Hindlimb ischemic mice (n=28) were divided randomly into four groups: Control group (normal saline, n=7), mouse VEGF group (mVEGF, n=7), nanoparticle including mVEGF group (N-mVEGF, n=7), and nanoparticle/hydrogel mouse VEGF group (NH-mVEGF, n=7). The drug was injected postoperatively into the thigh muscle of the ischemic limb. Perfusion, capillary number and H&E stain were assessed 28 d after treatment. Results: The capillary number increased in N-mVEGF and mVEGF group (P=0.026). Improvements of ischemic limb perfusion were inferior in N-mVEGF, NH-mVEGF groups (P=0.006) compared to other groups. Mice received N-mVEGF, NH-mVEGF treatment showed significant inflammation in the H&E staining. Conclusion: Sustained VEGF delivery via core/shell nanoparticle with lecithin core did not show improved perfusion rate despite an increase in capillary number. Furthermore, vacuolization and induction of inflammation requiring a different composition of nanoparticle should be tested. ๋ง์ดˆ ๋™๋งฅ ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ์œ ๋ณ‘๋ฅ ์€ 3โˆผ10%์ด๊ณ  70์„ธ ์ด์ƒ์—์„  15โˆผ20%๋กœ ํ˜„์žฌ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๊ณ ๋ น ์ธ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ํ™˜์ž์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋”์šฑ ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚  ์ „๋ง์ด๋‹ค.(1) ์ด๋“ค ์ค‘ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์˜ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์  ์žฌ๊ฑด์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ž๊ฐ€ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ œํ•œ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ,(2) ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์‹ ์ƒ์€ ์ฆ์ƒ ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์‹ ์ƒ์€ ์ง€๋‚œ 30๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์‹ฌ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ์ƒ‰, ์ƒ์ฒ˜ ์น˜์œ  ์ง€์—ฐ, ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ณ‘์ฆ, ๋ง๋ง‰๋ณ‘์ฆ, ์ด์‹ ์‹คํŒจ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜ธ์ „์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.(3-5) ํ˜ˆ๊ด€์„ ์‹ ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)๋Š” in vivo ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ฐจ๋ก€ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์‹ ์ƒ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ •๋งฅ ํˆฌ์—ฌ ์‹œ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค.(6) ๋”์šฑ์ด ์ธ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰๋œ VIVA ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” recombinant human VEGF์˜ ์ •๋งฅ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋Š” ์œ„์•ฝ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค.(7) ์ด ์‹คํ—˜์˜ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€์—์„œ๋Š” ์ •๋งฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ „์‹  ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋กœ ๋น„ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์‹ ์ƒ๊ณผ ๊ณ ํ˜ˆ์••, ๋ถ€์ข… ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค.(8-10)๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ VEGF์˜ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ •๋งฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ „์‹  ํˆฌ์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ตญ์†Œ์ ์ด๋ฉด์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๋ถ„๋น„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์ „๋‹ฌ์ฒด๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์š”๊ตฌ ๋œ๋‹ค.(11) ๋‚˜๋…ธ์ž…์ž(nanoparticle)์— VEGF๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์ด ์„œ๋ฐฉํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ผ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ฃผ๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„๋น„๋˜์–ด ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ทผ์œ„๋ถ€์œ„์— ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์‹ ์ƒ์„ ์ž๊ทนํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.(12,13) ๋‚˜๋…ธ์ž…์ž๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋ถ„์ž(micromolecule)๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ธํฌ์— ์˜ ํ•ด ์„ญ์ทจ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์†์ƒ ๋ถ€์œ„์— ์ง์ ‘ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค.(14) ํ˜„์žฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋‚˜๋…ธ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด ์ค‘ lecithin lipid core๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ core/shell ๋‚˜๋…ธ์ž…์ž๋Š” in vitro ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ VEGF์™€ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ VEGF๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.(11)์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” VEGF๋ฅผ ํ•จ์œ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” core/shell nanoparticle ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฅ์˜ ํ—ˆํ˜ˆ์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ง€(ischemic limb)์—์„œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ํšจ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ต์œก๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋ถ€์˜ ์ง€์›์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์Œ(๊ณผ์ œ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ: 800-20080766).Choi WI, 2010, ACTA BIOMATER, V6, P2666, DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.029Yang Z, 2009, VASC PHARMACOL, V51, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.vph.2009.07.001Hall H, 2007, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V13, P3597SURI SS, 2007, J OCCUP MED TOXICOL, V2, P16Oh KS, 2006, BIOMACROMOLECULES, V7, P2362, DOI 10.1021/bm060362kBussolati B, 2006, ANTIOXID REDOX SIGN, V8, P1153Hirsch AT, 2006, CIRCULATION, V113, pE463, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174526Jeon O, 2006, BIOMATERIALS, V27, P1598, DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.030Dai CY, 2005, COLLOID SURFACE B, V41, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.10.032Robertson D, 2004, J COLLOID INTERF SCI, V270, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.09.013Zisch AH, 2003, CARDIOVASC PATHOL, V12, P295, DOI 10.1016/S1054-8807(03)00089-9Simons M, 2003, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V2, P863, DOI 10.1038/nrd1226Stern M, 2003, GENE THER, V10, P1282, DOI 10.1038/sj.gt.3301994Sinha VR, 2003, J CONTROL RELEASE, V90, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00194-9Henry TD, 2003, CIRCULATION, V107, P1359, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000061911.47710.8AMartin A, 2003, MED RES REV, V23, P117, DOI 10.1002/med.10024Panyam J, 2002, FASEB J, V16Yang RH, 2002, HYPERTENSION, V39, P815Qaum T, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P2408Benns JM, 2001, J DRUG TARGET, V9, P123Murphy WL, 2000, BIOMATERIALS, V21, P2521Ferrara N, 1999, NAT MED, V5, P1359Godbey WT, 1999, J BIOMED MATER RES, V45, P268Ware JA, 1997, NAT MED, V3, P158Abdallah B, 1996, HUM GENE THER, V7, P1947FOLKMAN J, 1993, C R ACAD SCI 3, V316, P909RATNER BD, 1976, ACS SYM SER, V31, P1

    Optimized Tacrolimus Therapy in the Early Stage after Renal Transplantation

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Immunosuppressive regimen based on reduced-dose Tacrolimus (TAC) is widely accepted in the field of renal transplantation. However, optimal targetsfor TAC whole blood trough concentrations during the early period after kidney transplantation remain uncertain. Methods: A total of 184 consecutive adult renal transplant recipients with triple immunosuppression (TAC/Mycophenolate/corticosteroid) were included in this study. According to the trough level of TAC at day 7 after transplantation, patients were classified as low TAC concentration (LT, 15 ng/ml, n=24) groups. Rate of acute rejection, graft function and side effects of TAC within 1 yr after transplantation were evaluated. Results: There was no difference in trough concentrations of TAC at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after transplantation among the three groups. Significantly higher incidence of acute rejection within 2 weeks after transplantation was observed in LT group compared with IT and HT groups (17.4%, 5.6% and 4.8%, respectively, P=0.037). HT patients showed significantly better estimated glomerular filtration rates until 6 months after transplantation than IT and LT patients (75.5 +/- 24.8 vs. 63.8 +/- 12.8 and 64.3 +/- 15.2 ml/min at 6 months, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in TAC toxicity in terms of post-transplant diabetes and renal toxicity. Conclusion: Short-term high TAC exposure immediately after kidney transplantation may provide lower incidence of acute rejection and better restoration of graft function compared with low or intermediate TAC exposure. ์ง€๋‚œ 20์—ฌ ๋…„ ๊ฐ„ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ›„์˜ ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œ์š”๋ฒ•์— ๋งŽ์€ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. Tacrolimus (TAC)๋Š” cyclosporine์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋‹จ์œ„ mg๋‹น 100๋ฐฐ์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ์‹ ์žฅ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋ฅ ์„ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์ด์‹์‹ ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋” ์ข‹์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ํ˜„์žฌ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ›„์˜ ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œ์š”๋ฒ•์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํ”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.(1-3) ์‹ค์ œ 2006๋…„์˜ ๋ณด๊ณ ์—์„œ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์œ ์ง€ ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์ค‘์ธ ์‹ ์žฅ์ด์‹ ํ™˜์ž ์ค‘ 67%๊ฐ€ TAC๋ฅผ ์“ฐ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.(4) ์‹ ์žฅ, ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ด์‹ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰๋œ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์—ญ๋™ํ•™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ TAC์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ €๋†๋„(trough level)๊ฐ€ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ๋†๋„๊ณก์„ ํ•˜๋ฉด์ (area under the concentration-time curve)๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๊ณ ,(5,6) ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ TAC์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ €๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋…ธ์ถœ(drug exposure) ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ TAC์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ €์น˜ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๊ณผ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜,(7,8) ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ ์–ด๋Š ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘๊ณผ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ธ๊ฐ€์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ๋Š” ์—†๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘์€ ์‹ ์žฅ ์ด์‹ํŽธ ์†์‹ค์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์›์ธ์ธ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘(chronic rejection)์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์— ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ธ์ž๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ(9,10) ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋”์šฑ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ ์žฅ์ด์‹ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ์ผ์ฐจ ๋ฉด์—ญ์–ต์ œ์ œ๋กœ TAC๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์˜ TAC ํ˜ˆ์ค‘์ตœ์ €๋†๋„์™€ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€๋ฐ˜์‘ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ด์‹์‹ ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ  ์ด์‹ ํ›„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ TAC ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ €๋†๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.๋ณธ ๊ณผ์ œ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ๋…ธ๋ฐ”ํ‹ฐ์Šค(์ฃผ)์˜ ์ง€์›์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์Œ(#0620051860).Borobia AM, 2009, THER DRUG MONIT, V31, P436Il Min S, 2009, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V24, P2584, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfp192Opelz G, 2009, TRANSPLANTATION, V87, P795, DOI 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199c1c7Ekberg H, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V357, P2562Chang SH, 2007, TRANSPLANTATION, V84, P611, DOI 10.1097/01.tp.0000280553.23898.efSamaniego M, 2006, NAT CLIN PRACT NEPHR, V2, P688, DOI 10.1038/ncpneph0343MEIERKRIESCHE LIS, 2006, AM J TRANSPLANT, V6, P1111Webster AC, 2005, BRIT MED J, V331, P810, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38569.471007.AEGaspari F, 2004, AM J TRANSPLANT, V4, P1826, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00579.xKuypers DRJ, 2004, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V75, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.009Pascual M, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V346, P580Kaplan B, 2002, THER DRUG MONIT, V24, P36Staatz C, 2001, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V16, P1905Racusen LC, 1999, KIDNEY INT, V55, P713Undre NA, 1999, TRANSPLANT P, V31, P296JUSKO WJ, 1995, THER DRUG MONIT, V17, P596IHARA H, 1995, INT J UROL, V2, P151LINDHOLM A, 1993, TRANSPLANTATION, V56, P307RANDHAWA PS, 1993, AM J SURG PATHOL, V17, P60

    Acute Arterial Thromboembolism of Upper Extremity

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Acute, ischemia of the arm is uncommon compared with events in the leg and much less attention has been paid to the management of acute arterial thromboembolism of the upper extremities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical aspects and treatment outcomes of acute upper extremity thromboembolism. Methods: From January 2007 to March 2010, seven patients underwent the management of upper extremity thromboembolism in three Seoul National University (SNU)-affiliated hospitals. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records. Results: The mean age was 64.6 years (range 48 similar to 93 years) and 4 patients (57.1%) were female. Distribution of the thromboembolism were 4 in brachial, 1 in axillary plus brachial, 1 in ulnar and radial, and 1 in axillary artery, respectively. Time from symptom onset to presentation was 3.5 days (range 1 similar to 10 days). Primary treatment modality were Fogarty catheter embolectomy in 3 cases, bypass surgery in 1 case, and urokinase thrombolysis in 2 cases. A patient without symptoms was treated conservatively. Patients receiving primary thrombolytic therapy underwent surgical approach due to recurred thromboembolism during admission. In our 11.2 months of mean follow-up, there was recurrence but 1 patient died from cerebral infarction after 1.5 year of discharge. Conclusion: In this study, functional outcome of acute upper extremity ischemia following appropriate treatments was excellent. Key features of treatment are shortening the time interval of diagnosis to primary treatment, proper anticoagulation, and treatment of underlying conditions. Larger-volume, long-term results and meta-analysis of upper extremity thromboembolism are required to establish standardized treatment in Korea. ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ์ƒ์ง€ ๋™๋งฅ ํ˜ˆ์ „์ƒ‰์ „์ฆ์€ ๋“œ๋ฌธ ์งˆํ™˜์ด๋ฉฐ ํ•˜์ง€ ๋™๋งฅํ˜ˆ์ „์ƒ‰์ „์ฆ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ 1/4 ์ •๋„์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋นˆ๋„๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.(1)์ƒ์ง€ ํ†ต์ฆ์ด๋‚˜ ์ฐฝ๋ฐฑ, ๋งฅ๋ฐ•์†Œ์‹ค, ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ด์ƒ, ๋งˆ๋น„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ๋™๋งฅํ์ƒ‰์˜ ์ „ํ˜•์ ์ธ ์ฆ์ƒ์„ ํ˜ธ์†Œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ํ™•์ง„์ด ๋˜๋ฉด ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์— ์ค‘์žฌ์  ์‹œ์ˆ  ๋˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์™ธ๊ณผ์  ์‘๊ธ‰ ์งˆํ™˜์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ƒ์ง€ ๋™๋งฅ ํ˜ˆ์ „์ƒ‰์ „์ฆ์€ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋นˆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฆ์ƒ์„ ํ˜ธ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ง„๋ฃŒ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ด ์งˆํ™˜์˜ ๊ฐ๋ณ„์ง„๋‹จ์„ ๋‚ด๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์‰ฝ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ , ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ง„๋‹จ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ ํƒ์ด๋‚˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ์ง€์—ฐ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.(2)๊ตญ๋‚ด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฆ๋ก€ ๋ณด๊ณ  ํ˜•์‹์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋งŒ ์žˆ์–ด ์™”๊ณ ,(3)์™ธ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋„ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์  ๋˜๋Š” ์ค‘์žฌ์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์ดํ›„์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์ƒ์กด์œจ์ด๋‚˜ ์žฌ๋ฐœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ๋ฐ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ €์ž๋“ค์€ 3๊ฐœ ๋ณ‘์› ์™ธ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•œ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ์ƒ์ง€ ๋™๋งฅ ํ˜ˆ์ „์ƒ‰์ „์ฆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฆ๋ก€๋“ค์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์–‘์ƒ, ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์ง€์นจ์„ ํ™•๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜๊ณ ์ž ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Magishi K, 2010, ANN THORAC CARDIOVAS, V16, P31Edwards NM, 2009, CLIN J SPORT MED, V19, P331Rutherford RB, 2009, SEMIN VASC SURG, V22, P5, DOI 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.12.003O`Connell JB, 2009, SEMIN VASC SURG, V22, P10, DOI 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.12.004POUSIOS D, 2009, INTERACT CARDIOVASC, V9, P532Ueberrueck T, 2007, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V48, P181Karapolat S, 2006, SURG TODAY, V36, P416, DOI 10.1007/s00595-005-3156-7Licht PB, 2004, EUR J VASC ENDOVASC, V28, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.007Go AS, 2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V290, P2685KIM KH, 2003, J KOREAN SOC VASC SU, V19, P139Hernandez-Richter T, 2001, LANGENBECK ARCH SURG, V386, P261KOYAMA T, 2000, JPN J VASC SURG, V9, P479Eyers P, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1340MARTINET O, 1994, HELV CHIR ACTA, V60, P875BERGQVIST D, 1983, WORLD J SURG, V7, P786KAIRALUOMA MI, 1976, ANN CHIR GYNAECOL FE, V65, P163FOGARTY TJ, 1971, AM J SURG, V122, P231

    Differentiated Muscle-derived Stem Cells Attenuate Intimal Hyperplasia after Carotid Balloon Injury in Rat

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Although progenitor cells may contribute to intimal hyperplasia (IH) after arterial injury, positive contribution of IH is variable with type of injury or cells. This study was designed to examine whether differentiated muscle derived stem cells (MDSC) attenuate IH in rat. Methods: MDSCs were retrieved using preplate techniques from rat calf muscle and MDSCs (preplate 6th culture fraction, pp6) were exposed to VEGF (50 ng/ml) for endothelial differentiation prior to injection. Male rats were divided into two groups (cell treated vs. control) and underwent carotid balloon injury with 2-Fr catheter. The virus containing Green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene was transfected into cells for monitoring. Cells (5x10(6)) were indwelled into carotid artery for 30 minutes after injury and then blood flow was restored. Arteries were harvested at various intervals (1, 2 and 4 weeks) after injury. The intima to media thickness ratio (IMTR) was calculated with morphometric analysis. Results: Endothelial surface markers such as VE-CADHERIN were strongly expressed on differentiated MDSCs. At 4 weeks after injury, IH was predominantly observed in control group compared to cell treated group. The intensity of OFF was strongly observed at 1 week and declined at 4 weeks in carotid artery wall at MDSC group. CD31(+) endothelial cells were observed at MDSC group compared to control. The mean IMTR in cell treated groups were significantly lower than control at 2 weeks (P=0.005) and 4 weeks (P <= 0.001). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that MDSCs therapy promotes re-endothelialization and leads to attenuation of IH after balloon injury in rat. ๋™๋งฅ ํ์ƒ‰์งˆํ™˜ ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ๋™๋งฅ ์šฐํšŒ์ˆ  ํ˜น์€ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ๋‚ด ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋“ค์ด ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์˜ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ถ”์ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์‹œ ์žฌํ˜‘์ฐฉ ํ˜น์€ ํ์ƒ‰์„ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ํ์ƒ‰์›์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋‚ด๋ง‰ ์ฆ์‹์ฆ ๋‚ด๋ง‰์†์ƒ ํ›„ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ํ‰ํ™œ๊ทผ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋‚ด๋ง‰์ด๋™ ๋ฐ ์ฆ์‹๊ณผ ๊ฒฐ์ฒด์กฐ์ง์˜ ์นจ์ฐฉ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€๋‚ด๊ฐ•์˜ ํ˜‘์ฐฉ์ด ์ดˆ๋ž˜๋˜์–ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ƒ๊ธฐ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋“ค์˜ ์‹คํŒจ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ดํ•ด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.(1) ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ํ˜ˆ๊ด€์ „๊ตฌ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๋‚ด๋ง‰ ์ฆ์‹์ฆ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ‘ํƒœ์ƒ๋ฆฌ ๊ฐœ๋…์ด ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ๋Œ€๋‘๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘, ์กฐ์ง, ํ˜น์€ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜ ๋‚ด์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๊ตฌ์„ธํฌ๋“ค์ด ํ˜ˆ๊ด€์†์ƒ๋ถ€์œ„๋กœ ์›๊ฒฉ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚ด๋ง‰์ฆ์‹์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ ์„ธํฌ์›์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ฃผ์žฅ์ด ์ œ๊ธฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ „๊ตฌ์„ธํฌ๋“ค์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋‚ด๋ง‰์ฆ์‹์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์†์ƒ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ˜น์€ ์ „๊ตฌ์„ธํฌ๋“ค์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‚ด๋ง‰ ์ฆ์‹์˜ ์–ต์ œ ํ˜น์€ ์ด‰์ง„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.(2) ์ €์ž๋“ค์€ ๊ทผ์œก ๋‚ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ค„๊ธฐ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ๋‚ดํ”ผ์„ธํฌ๋กœ์˜ ์œ ๋„ ํ›„ ๋ฐฑ์„œ ๊ฒฝ๋™๋งฅ ์†์ƒ๋ถ€์œ„์— ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚ด๋ง‰์ฆ์‹์–ต ์ œ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2006๋…„ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์žฌ์›์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๊ตญํ•™์ˆ ์ง„ํฅ์žฌ๋‹จ์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž„(KFR-2006-331-E00155).Tsai S, 2009, J VASC SURG, V49, P502, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.060Okada M, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V52, P1869, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.064HUARD J, 2008, J MUSCULOSKELET NEU, V8, P337WANG CH, 2008, SS, V28, P54NA BG, 2008, J KOREAN SOC VASC SU, V24, P155Kang HJ, 2004, LANCET, V363, P751KONG D, 2004, SS, V109, P1769TANAKA K, 2003, SS, V93, P783GRIESE DP, 2003, SS, V108, P2710Qu-Petersen ZQ, 2002, J CELL BIOL, V157, P851, DOI 10.1083/jcb.200108150SATA M, 2002, SS, V8, P403WALTER DH, 2002, SS, V105, P3017Tomanek RJ, 2000, ANAT REC, V261, P126Huss R, 2000, STEM CELLS, V18, P252Asahara T, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P964FINGERLE J, 1990, SS, V10, P1082CLOWES AW, 1989, J CARDIOVASC PHARM, V14, pS12

    Campaign for the optimal treatment of varicose veins: welcoming the declaration of the Code of Ethics issued by the Korean Society for Phlebology

    No full text
    Background: Varicose veins (VV) is a common chronic venous disorder that is often left untreated due to its minor symptoms. However, recent developments in minimal invasive surgery has resulted in a rapid increase of VV treatment cases. Unfortunately, there have been some ethical issues regarding the high cost of intervention and non-professional treatment administered for VV at some private clinics. Current Concepts: Most endovenous therapies for VV are not reimbursed by the national health insurance but are only covered by personal health insurance plans in Korea. Rapid increase in the coverage costs for VV treatment has led to conflicts between the insurance companies and doctors in several cases. Recently, the Korean Society for Phlebology declared the Code of Ethics to support evidence-based treatment and warn against unethical practices related to interventions for VV. Discussion and Conclusion: The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery and Korean Society for Phlebology have just launched a campaign for the optimal treatment of VV on their YouTube channel, which shares accurate information regarding VV treatment to inform patients and doctors. To strengthen doctor-patient relationship and to avoid falling prey to unethical practitioners, it is critical to educate and update patients and healthcare service providers regarding the options available for VV treatment.N

    An Integrated Approach toward Strategic Information Systems Planning Methodologies

    No full text
    Maste
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore