31 research outputs found

    Loss of p27(kip1) expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with taxane-treated breast cancer

    No full text
    Purpose: Decreased expression of p27(kip1) and p57(kip2) is considered as a prognostic indicator in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Previous in vitro studies have reported that reduced expression of p27(kip1) and p57(kip2) is associated with resistance to taxane, which is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, we investigated the association of low p27(kip1) and p57(kip2) expression with outcomes in patients with breast cancer.Methods: We investigated 226 cases of breast cancer from Kangbuk SMC between 2000 and 2005. Levels of p27(kip1) and p57(kip2) expression were evaluated using immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue microarray specimens. The relationships between the expression levels of the markers and patients' outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model.Results: Low p57(kip2) expression was only associated with negative progesterone receptor status (p = 0.034), whereas p27(kip1) expression was associated with poor prognosis of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.005). More detailed analysis revealed that low p27(kip1) expression affects the overall survival rate of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy including taxane (p = 0.026), but not that of patients receiving chemotherapy without taxane.Conclusions: Low p27(kip1) expression may be useful to predict overall survival in patients with breast cancer who are treated with taxane. Evaluation of p27(kip1) expression may provide further prognostic information beyond traditional prognostic biomarkers and an understanding of the mechanisms that impart resistance against chemotherapy.This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2017)

    Middle power ่ฆ–่ง’์—์„œ ๋ณธ ้Ÿ“ๅœ‹่ปไบ‹ไบคๆ˜“์˜ ๅฏฆ่ญ‰็š„็ก็ฉถ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธๅคงๅญธๆ ก ่กŒๆ”ฟๅคงๅญธ้™ข :่กŒๆ”ฟๅญธ็ง‘ ่กŒๆ”ฟๅญธๅฐˆๆ”ป,1996.Maste

    Task and Flow-based Manufacturing Execution Language for Rapid Control Programming

    No full text
    MasterNowadays, market demand is becoming more diverse and unpredictable, and the life cycle of products is getting shorter. For these reasons, manufacturing systems consisting of integrated equipment and control software must be flexible and reconfigurable. Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) have been widely used in most industries as industrial computers owing to some advantages of PLCs such as flexibility in programming and easy troubleshooting. However, PLC programming is still tricky and ladder programs for high-level controls are sometimes unmanageably long. It is important to note that recent manufacturing systems are getting more complicated, and very often require complex algorithms involving a larger number of contacts and variables. To tackle these issues, this study presents a conceptual framework of Manufacturing Execution Language (MEL) that enables task and flow-based rapid control programming. MEL is a structured information format defined in XML format to delineate the dynamics of manufacturing systems with abstracted factory objects and task flows. Furthermore, a new control programming framework and its implementation environment are proposed using MEL and a virtual workcell in ROS simulation tool, Gazebo. The proposed MEL-based programming method makes it easy for users to develop and verify control logic in a virtual environment. The effectiveness of MEL is examined using a laboratory-scale factory testbed.์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋“ค์˜ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋”์šฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•ด์ง€๊ณ  ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค์–ด์กŒ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ œํ’ˆ ์ˆ˜๋ช… ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋˜ํ•œ ์ ์  ์งง์•„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ œ์กฐ ์„ค๋น„์™€ ์ œ์–ด ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ œ์กฐ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์œ ์—ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs)๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์˜ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ„ํŽธํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œํ•ด๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์žฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด์˜ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, PLC ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋ฒˆ๊ฑฐ๋กœ์šฐ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ž˜๋” ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค ์ •๋„๋กœ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ œ์กฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์ ์  ๋” ๋ณต์žกํ•ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ ‘์ ๊ณผ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” task์™€ flow ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ์‹ ์† ์ œ์–ด ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” Manufacturing Execution Language(MEL)์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์  ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. MEL์€ XML ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋œ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ์ •๋ณด ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ, ์ถ”์ƒํ™”๋œ ๊ณต์žฅ object์™€ task flow๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์กฐ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” MEL๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์ƒ ์ œ์กฐ ์›Œํฌ์…€์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ œ์–ด ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ MEL ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ƒํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ œ์–ด๋กœ์ง์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•œ๋‹ค. MEL์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์‹ค ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฒ ๋“œ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค
    corecore