8 research outputs found
Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving
Clinically Applicable Serum Biomarkers Among 14 Candidates Associated With Recurrence of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer
Background/aim: We evaluated the predictive value of candidate serum biomarkers for recurrence in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) after curative surgery.
Patients and methods: A total of 33 and 120 patients with CRC with or without recurrence at 5 years after curative surgery were included in the training set and the validation set, respectively. Possible serum biomarkers were examined for associations with CRC recurrence using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.
Results: In the training set, the expression levels of the 14 biomarkers were compared according to recurrence. Among them, five biomarkers that had significantly different expression levels were validated in 60 patients with recurrence at 5 years after curative surgery and 60 patients without. Multivariate analysis showed that natural log-transformed values of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cyclin-dependent kinase regulatory subunit 2 (CKS2), 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 2 (OAS2), and autophagy-related gene 5 (ATG5) in preoperative serum were significantly related to recurrence. ROC analysis showed that these biomarkers were able to discriminate patients with recurrence from those without (area under the curve=0.828, 95% confidence interval=0.755-0.990).
Conclusion: Preoperative serum levels of CEA, CKS2, OAS2 and ATG5 were independent risk factors for recurrence. A combination of serum CEA, CKS2, OAS2 and ATG5 predicted tumor recurrence well in patients with stage II and III CRC.
Keywords: ATG5; CEA; CKS2; Colorectal cancer; OAS2; biomarkers; recurrence
The Role and Clinical Effectiveness of Multiline Chemotherapy in Advanced Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor
BACKGROUND: A multimodal approach is the standard treatment for desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT); however, many patients are diagnosed with inoperable disease, which leaves chemotherapy as the only treatment option. There are limited data on the effectiveness of palliative chemotherapy, especially when used after first-line treatment. Here, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with DSRCT treated with multiple lines of chemotherapy.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 14 patients with pathologically confirmed DSRCT at Asan Medical Center between 2004 and 2018.
RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 25, with males comprising 92.9% of patients. All patients had inoperable disease at presentation and received chemotherapy as the initial treatment. Four patients (28.6%) were treated with surgery, and complete resection was achieved in 1 patient. Median overall survival (OS) was 23.9 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 92.9%, 48.6%, and 19.5%, respectively. In patients receiving first- (N = 14), second- (N = 10), and third-line (N = 8) chemotherapy, median time-to-progression was 9.9, 3.5, and 2.5 months, respectively, and the disease control rates were 100%, 88.9%, and 75.0%, respectively. Factors associated with longer OS in the univariable analysis were <= 2 metastatic sites at presentation (27.0 vs 14.7 months; P = .024) and surgery with intended complete resection (43.5 vs 20.1 months; P = .027).
CONCLUSIONS: Although advanced DSRCT may initially respond to chemotherapy after first-line treatment, the response becomes less durable as the disease progresses. Individualized treatment decisions focused on palliation should be made
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Treatment Patterns for Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Medical Facility in Korea
Simple Summary
The COVID-19 pandemic is threatening to public health, including malignant disease. Fear of viral infection has influenced the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer and may result in impairment of surgical and oncologic outcomes. Therefore, we need to analyze the influence of COVID-19 on surgical outcomes of colorectal cancer and provide guidance on proper diagnosis and treatment, including public messaging regarding appropriate healthcare.
Because of their reluctance to visit the hospital due to concerns about contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), patients with colorectal cancer have been affected by delays in care during the pandemic. This study assessed the effects of the pandemic on the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment patterns of colorectal cancer patients at a tertiary medical facility in Korea. Patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at our institution between March and September 2020 were analyzed. Clinicopathological and treatment characteristics were compared with those of patients who underwent surgery in 2018 and 2019. The patients who did not undergo tumor resection (4.1% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001) and who received neoadjuvant treatment (16.7% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.039) were significantly higher during the COVID period. The minimally invasive approach was performed less during the COVID period (81.2% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). More patients in the COVID period required combined resection of organs adjacent to the tumor (4.8% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.017). Surgical aggressiveness, as shown by the proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery and adjacent organ resection, was significantly influenced by the pandemic. In addition, resectability decreased during the COVID period. These characteristics will likely influence long-term oncological outcomes, indicating the need for long-term monitoring of this cohort
Influence of Postoperative Changes in Sarcopenia on Long-Term Survival in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients
Simple Summary
The number of colorectal cancer survivors is increasing due to improvements in oncologic outcomes. Therefore, the risks of metachronous cancer and second cancer are also increased, as well as recurrences. The influence of muscle mass measured as sarcopenia on long-term survival has been studied recently in colorectal cancer patients. Sarcopenia is a factor controllable by lifestyle modification and has gained interest more recently. This study showed an influence of changes in sarcopenia on long-term oncologic outcomes in colorectal cancer and suggests a basis for further investigation of body composition factors, including sarcopenia.
The effect of perioperative sarcopenic changes on prognosis remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 2333 non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated between January 2009 and December 2012 at the Asan Medical Center. The body composition at diagnosis was measured via abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using Asan-J software. Patients underwent CT scans preoperatively, as well as at 6 months-1 year and 2-3 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the association between perioperative sarcopenic changes and survival. According to sarcopenic criteria, 1155 (49.5%), 890 (38.2%), and 893 (38.3%) patients had sarcopenia preoperatively, 6 months-1 year, and 2-3 years postoperatively, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (95.8% vs. 92.1%, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.234, p < 0.001) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (93.2% vs. 86.2%, HR = 2.251, p < 0.001) rates were significantly lower in patients with preoperative sarcopenia. Both OS and RFS were lower in patients with persistent sarcopenia 2-3 years postoperatively than in those who recovered (OS: 96.2% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.001; RFS: 91.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, postoperative sarcopenia was confirmed as an independent factor associated with decreased OS and RFS. Pre- and postoperative sarcopenia and changes in the condition during surveillance were associated with oncological outcomes
Intraoperative perfusion assessment of the proximal colon by a visual grading system for safe anastomosis after resection in left-sided colorectal cancer patients
We aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of a new visual grading system. We included 50 patients who underwent resection of primary colorectal cancer. Before anastomosis, the marginal vessel was cut and the perfusion status was assessed by a visual grading system. The visual grading system is comprised of five grades according to the bleeding from the marginal vessel and is categorized into 4 groups: good (grade A and B), moderate (grade C), poor (grade D) and none (grade E). Colorectal anastomosis was performed only in the good and moderate groups. We compared postoperative outcomes between the good and moderate groups and analysed the factors affecting the perfusion grade. Among the patients, 48% were grade A, 12% were grade B, and 40% were grade C. There was no anastomotic leakage. Only one patient with grade C showed ischemic colitis and needed reoperation. Age was the only factor correlated with perfusion grade in multivariate analysis (OR 1.080, 95% CI 1.006-1.159, p=0.034). The perfusion grades were significantly different between >65 and <65 year-old patients (>65, A 29.2% B 12.5% C 58.3% vs. <65, A 65.4% B 11.5% C 23.1%, p=0.006). Our intraoperative perfusion assessment that uses a cutting method and a visual grading system is simple and useful for performing a safe anastomosis after colorectal resection. If the perfusion grade is better than grade C, an anastomosis can be performed safely. Age was found to be an important factor affecting the perfusion grade
Characteristics and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer after Liver or Kidney Transplantation
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and prognosis of de novo CRC patients who underwent liver or kidney transplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 66 de novo CRC patients selected from 8,734 liver transplant (LT) or kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We analyzed characteristics and survival outcomes of de novo CRC patients and sporadic CRC patients who underwent radical surgery with stage I-III in Asan Medical Center between 2005 and 2016. Survival outcomes were analyzed via the 1:4 matching method. Results The standard incidence ratio (SIR) of de novo CRC in KT recipients is 1.67 in men and 2.54 in women. That in LT recipients is 3.10 in men and 2.25 in women. Compared with sporadic CRC patients, de novo CRC patients had more colon cancer than rectal cancer (p=0.041). In 9 patients (13.6%), CRC was diagnosed within one year after transplantation, 21 patients (31.8%) were diagnosed between 1-5 years, and the remaining 36 patients (54.6%) were diagnosed thereafter. There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups (p=0.211 and p=0.324, respectively). Conclusions The risk of developing de novo CRC in transplant recipients was higher than in the general population. The survival outcome of de novo CRC was no different compared with the sporadic CRC. Therefore, regular surveillance is essential for timely diagnosis and treatment for transplantation patients. A large prospective study for an intense CRC surveillance program in transplantation patients is needed
