22 research outputs found

    ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€๊ฑฐ์ฃผ T ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ CCCTC-๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์ธ์ž์˜ ์—ญํ• 

    No full text
    ์˜๊ณผํ•™Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly pruritic, chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease characterized by significant T-cell infiltration and frequently recurs in the same areas of the skin, and even resolved skin keeps the diseaseโ€™s memory. While the role of tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM cells) has been well studied in the chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis which relapses in the same sites, that of TRM cells in AD has not been investigated in detail. CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a ubiquitously expressed regulator of fundamental genetic processes including transcription, intra- and interchromosomal interactions, and chromatin structure. Because of its critical role in genome function, CTCF binding patterns have long been assumed to be largely invariant across different cellular environments. Therefore, the functional analysis of CTCF in the different types of cells and tissues would further expand our knowledge in the roles of CTCF. In this dissertation, I focus on the role of CTCF in TRM cells in AD. To explore the function of TRM cells in AD. I examined how many TRM cells expressing the canonical maker CD69 and CD103 existed and which cytokines including IL-4, IL13, IL-17, IL-22 and IFN-ฦด these cells produced in human AD and age-matched normal skin tissues and in AD-like mouse models generated with the treatment of allergens (1-Fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB), oxazolone, ovalbumin) or mixture thereof. I also evaluated which AD triggering factors affected the development of TRM cells and the production of cytokines using purified cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA) expressing T cells from normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Finally, using transcriptomics, I evaluated the cytokine signatures and novel genes associated with skin TRM cells compared to migratory memory T cells (TMM) in human normal and AD skin. I observed that CD69+ and CD103+ TRM cells significantly infiltrated into chronic AD skin compared to normal skin. However, normal skin mostly ontained CD103- and CD69- T cells. Significant numbers of CD69+ AD TRM cells produced Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13), Th17 cytokines (IL-17, IL-22), and Th1 cytokines (IFN-ฦด). In AD-like mouse model induced by allergen mixture, CD69+ skin TRM cells produced various cytokines (IL-4, IL-17, IL-22 and IFN-ฦด) compared to a single allergen induced AD-like mouse models. During the incubation of CLA+ T cells for 3 weeks, CD69+ expression of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was continuously increased in a time-dependent manner while CD103+ expression was not significantly changed. Repeated exposure to thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a well-known AD triggering factor, induced more CD69+ TRM cells during the development of AD TRM. Various cytokines (IL4, IL17, IL-22 and IFN-ฦด) were considerably produced in CD69+ TRM cells compared to CD69- T cells in AD mimicking mice after 3 weeks. I further confirmed that AD CD69+ TRM cells expressed higher levels of Th1, Th2, Th17 and Th22 cytokines and their transcription factors (T-bet, GATA3, RORฦดt and Ahr) showing unique transcriptional profiles distinct from those of AD CD69- TMM cells or normal skin CD69+ TRM cells. I further identified various genes associated with tissue egress and residency specific to AD TRM cells. Among those, I chose CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) because of its role in immune diseases. I confirmed the decrease of CTCF in CD69+ TRM cells from AD patient skin. In conclusion, CTCF may play an important role in regulating the expression of multiple cytokines from CD69+ TRM cells in AD skin. Through this mechanism, repeated exposure to AD-triggering factors might induce AD TRM cells to produce multiple cytokines and sustain the recurrence and chronicity of AD patients. ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ์€ ์†Œ์–‘์ฆ์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ์žฌ๋ฐœ์„ฑ์˜ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ์งˆํ™˜์œผ๋กœ, ์™ธ๋ถ€ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์นจ์ž…ํ•œ ํ•ญ์› ๋ฌผ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ง„ํ”ผ์˜ ๋ฉด์—ญ์„ธํฌ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์•ผ๊ธฐ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ณผ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž๋ฆฌ์— ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ๊ฑฐ์ฃผ T ์„ธํฌ (TRM ์„ธํฌ)๋Š” ๊ธฐ์–ต T ์„ธํฌ์˜ ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋กœ ๋ง์ดˆ ์กฐ์ง์— ์˜ค๋žœ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธํฌ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์œ„์žฅ๊ด€, ๊ธฐ๋„, ํ”ผ๋ถ€์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ™์ฃผ์™€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ ‘์ ์˜ ์ƒํ”ผ ๋ง‰ ์กฐ์ง์— ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)๋Š” DNA ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ zinc-finger ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ๋กœ์„œ, ๊ณ ์ฐจ์› ํฌ๋กœ๋งˆํ‹ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์ž์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ์ธ์€ ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ์—์„œ์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ๊ฑฐ์ฃผ T ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์—ญํ• ๊ณผ ์„ฑ์ƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ๊ฑฐ์ฃผ T ์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ์„ ์•…ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ CTCF ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. CD69+ ๋ฐ CD103+ TRM ์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ ์ •์ƒ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์— ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ์นจํˆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ •์ƒ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์—๋Š” ๋น„๊ต์  CD103- ๋ฐ CD69- ์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ฉด์—ญํ˜•๊ด‘์—ผ์ƒ‰๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด CD69+ AD TRM ์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ Th2 ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ (IL-4, IL-13), Th17 ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ (IL-17, IL-22) ๋ฐ Th1 ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ (IFN-ฦด)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ๋“ค์„ ๋ถ„๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ (DNFB, ์˜ฅ์‚ฌ์กธ๋ก , ์˜ค๋ฐœ๋ถ€๋ฏผ) ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์˜ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์•Œ๋Ÿฌ์  ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ด ์•Œ๋Ÿฌ์  ๋“ค์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์˜ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ๋“ค์„ ๋งŽ์ด ๋ถ„๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3์ฃผ๊ฐ„์˜ CLA+ T ์„ธํฌ ๋ฐฐ์–‘ ๋™์•ˆ, CD4+ ๋ฐ CD8+ T ์„ธํฌ์˜ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚ ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์กฐ์„ฑํ•ด ์ฃผ์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ๋“ค์ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด AD CD69- TMM ๋ฐ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ RNA๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด microarray ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ Th1, Th2, Th17 ๋ฐ Th22 ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ๊ณผ ๊ทธ ์ „์‚ฌ์ธ์ž (T-bet, GATA3, RORฦดt ๋ฐ Ahr)๋“ค์ด ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „์ฒด 47322 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ž ์ค‘ AD CD69- TMM ์„ธํฌ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ AD CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ CTCF ์œ ์ „์ž๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ์ธ์€ CTCF ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ์ •์ƒ์ธ์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€์กฐ์ง์—์„œ, ๋˜ํ•œ CD69- TMM ์„ธํฌ์— ๋น„ํ•ด CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋จ์„ ๋ฉด์—ญํ™”ํ•™์—ผ์ƒ‰๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋ฉด์—ญํ˜•๊ด‘์—ผ์ƒ‰, real-time PCR ๋ฐ shRNA๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ ์œ ๋ฐœ ์›์ธ์— ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๋ฉด CTCF ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์–ด ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ์˜ CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด CD69+ TRM ์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ดํ† ์นด์ธ๋“ค์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด์„œ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์•„ํ† ํ”ผํ”ผ๋ถ€์—ผ์˜ ์•…ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.open๋ฐ•

    Positive reactions to nickel on a patch test do not predict clinical outcome of nickel alloy-based atrial septal defect occluder implantation

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patch testing is thought to be necessary prior to metal device implantation to rule out metal allergy-related complications; however, there are controversies over the effects of nickel allergy on the outcome of nickel alloy-based device implantation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events in a Korean population of nickel allergy patients who underwent atrial septal defect (ASD) closure with a nickel-titanium alloy-based device. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ASD closure with a nitinol device. RESULTS: Among 38 patients who had ASD closure, 4 of 5 nickel-allergic patients and 10 of the 33 non-nickel-allergic patients had post-closure complications. All patients fared well, without device failure culminating in device removal. CONCLUSION: In this study, positive reactions to nickel in a patch test were not associated with adverse early or late outcomes following ASD closure with a nickel alloy-based device.ope
    corecore