6 research outputs found
μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ νκ²½κ°μμ± μ¦μ§ν¨κ³Ό μ€νμ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (μμ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : νλκ³Όμ (λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ 곡), 2012. 2. κΉνμ.μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μ λͺ©μ μ μ₯μκ°κ³Ό νκ²½κ°μμ±μ΄ λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μμ κ°μ§λ μλ―Έλ₯Ό μ΄ν΄λ³΄κ³ ,νμ΅μμ νκ²½κ°μμ± μ¦μ§μ κΈ°μ¬νλλ‘ κ΅¬μ±λ μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ΄ νμ΅μμ νκ²½κ°μμ± μ¦μ§μ κ°λ ν¨κ³Όλ₯Ό μμ보λ κ²μ΄λ€.
μ°κ΅¬ λμμμ νκ²½κ°μμ± λΆμ‘± νμμ λͺ©κ²©νκ³ , νκ²½κ°μμ±, νκ²½λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘, μ₯μκΈ°λ° κ΅μ‘κ³Ό μ₯μκΈ°λ° κ΅μ‘μ κ΄ν μ΄λ‘ μ κ³ μ°°κ³Ό μ ν μ°κ΅¬ νꡬλ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μ°κ΅¬ μ§λ¬Έμ μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ ν΅ν νκ²½κ°μμ± μ¦μ§μΌλ‘ ꡬ체ννμκ³ , μ΄λ₯Ό μν κ΅μ‘μ μ κ·ΌμΌλ‘ μμ λ₯Ό νμ©ν ν΅ν© κ΅μ‘μ μΈ‘λ©΄μ΄ κ³ λ €λμλ€. μ°κ΅¬μμ νμ΅μμ μΉλ°κ°κ³Ό νκ²½κ°μμ± νμ±μμ νμμ±μ κ³ λ €νμ¬ μ°κ΅¬ λμμλ λꡬκ΄μμ D ꡬμ
μμ¬ν J μ΄λ±νκ΅ 5 νλ
ν νκΈμ΄ λμλ€.
μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ ꡬμ±μ μμ κ·Έλ¦Ό, κΈμ°κΈ°, νκ²½κ°μμ± κ²μ¬ λꡬλ₯Ό ν΅ν νκ²½κ°μμ± μ¬μ μ§λ¨μ μ€μνμκ³ , μ¬μ μ§λ¨μμ λ°κ²¬λ μ·¨μ½ν νκ²½κ°μμ± κ΅¬μ±μμλ³λ‘ 3 μ°¨μ μμ
μ μ κ°νμλ€. 4 κ°μκ° μ€μλ 3 μ°¨μ μμ
μ ν΅ν΄ λ―Έμ μν 62 κ°, κΈμ°κΈ° 52 λΆ μΈμ, μ°κ΅¬μμ μ°Έμ¬κ΄μ°°, μ¬μΈ΅ λ©΄λ΄, μμ
촬μμ ν΅ν λΆμμ μΈ μλ£κ° μμ§λμλ€. μΈμ΄μ κΈμ°κΈ°μ μ°½μ μ€μ¬μ λ―Έμ νλμ΄ ν΅ν©λ κ΅μ‘μ μ κ·Ό κ³Όμ μμ μμ§λ μλ£λ μμ
μ 맀 λ¨κ³μμ νκ²½κ°μμ±μ νμ±νκ³ μ§λ¨νλ 맀κ°μ²΄κ° λμμΌλ©°, μ¬μ μ§λ¨κ³Ό μ¬ν μ§λ¨μ μ μΈνκ³ νκ²½κ°μμ± μ§λ¨μ κ·Έλ¦Όμ λΉλ‘―ν λ―Έμ μνμ μ€μ¬μΌλ‘ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ‘λ€. 3 μ°¨μ μμ
μ μ€νν μ΄ν, λ³νλ νκ²½κ°μμ±μ μμμ νμ
νκΈ° μνμ¬ λ―Έμ μν, νκ²½κ°μμ± κ²μ¬ λꡬλ₯Ό ν΅ν μ¬ν μ§λ¨μ μ€μνμκ³ , νκ²½κ°μμ± κ²μ¬ λꡬλ νκ· , νμ€νΈμ°¨, λ
립νλ³Έ t κ²μ¦μ μ΄μ©νμ¬ ν΅κ³μ²λ¦¬ λμλ€.
μ°κ΅¬μ μ£Όμ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μμ½νλ©΄ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
첫째, νκ²½μ κ΄ν λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μμ μ₯μμ κ΄ν λ
Όμκ° λ°νμ΄ λμ΄μΌ νλ€. νμ΅μμ μΈμ λμμ΄μ μΈμ μμ©μΈ μ₯μμ λν μ λλ 곧 νκ²½μ κ΄ν κ°μΉκ΄μ νμ±νλ©° μ±
μ μλ νκ²½νλμ μ€μ²μΌλ‘ μ°κ³λ μ μλ€.
λμ§Έ, μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ νμ΅μμ μ₯μκ° μ¦μ§μ ν¨κ³Όμ μ΄λ€. νμ΅μ μΆμ μ₯μμ μΆμ΄ μ§μ μ μΌλ‘ μΌμ΄λμ§ μλ μ₯μμ λν΄ μλλ λ―Έμ νλμ μ₯μμ λν μ μ°©κ³Ό κ΄μ¬μ νμ±νμ¬ μ₯μκ° μ μ§λκΈ°λ₯Ό λ°λΌλ νλκ° νμΈλμλ€.
μ
μ§Έ, μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ νμ΅μμ νκ²½κ°μμ± μ¦μ§μ ν¨κ³Όμ μ΄λ€. μκ°μ , μΈμ΄μ μμ λ₯Ό νμ©ν μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ νμ΅μμ μκ°μ ννμ λν κ±°λΆκ°μ μ€μ΄κ³ λ―Έμ νλμ ν΅ν νκ²½κ°μμ± νμ±κ³Ό μ§λ¨μ λ§€μ° κΈμ μ μΌλ‘ κΈ°μ¬ν¨μ μ μ μμλ€.
λ·μ§Έ, μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ νμ΅μμ μΉνκ²½μ νλ μ€μ² κ°λ₯μ± μ¦μ§μ ν¨κ³Όμ μ΄λ€. μ₯μκ°κ³Ό νκ²½κ°μμ±μ μ₯μμ νκ²½μ κ΄ν κ°μ μ΄μ
μ μμ±μΌλ‘ μ±
μ μλ νκ²½νλ μ€μ²μ λμΈμ΄λ€. μΌλ ¨μ μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μ€νμ νμ΅μκ° μ£Όλ³ μ₯μλ₯Ό μ€μ¬μΌλ‘, νκ²½ 보νΈλ₯Ό μν νλ λ€μ§μ λλ¬λ΄μ΄ μΉνκ²½μ νλ μ€μ²μ μΌμ‘°ν κ²μμ΄ λνλ¬λ€.
μ΄ μ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ νκ²½μ κ΄ν λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ μ κ·Όμμ μ₯μμ κ΄ν λ
Όμκ° λ°νμ΄ λμ΄μΌ νλ€λ μ , μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘ μ€νμ μκ°μ , μΈμ΄μ μμ λ₯Ό νμ©ν ν΅ν© κ΅μ‘μ μΈ‘λ©΄μ΄ ν¨κ³Όμ μ΄λΌλ μ , μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ μ€νμ΄ νμ΅μμ μ₯μκ°κ³Ό νκ²½κ°μμ±, λμκ° μΉνκ²½μ νλ μ€μ²μ λμ μκ΄κ΄κ³κ° μμμ λ°νλ΄μλ€. λμ±μ΄ μ°κ΅¬ λμμμ νκ²½κ°μμ± λΆμ‘±μ΄λΌλ λ¬Έμ μν© ν΄κ²°μ μν΄ μ₯μκΈ°λ° λ―Έμ κ΅μ‘μ μ΄λ‘ κ³Ό μ€μ²μ κ΄ν μ΄ν΄λ₯Ό μ€νμ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μννμ¬, μ°κ΅¬μ μνμκ° μ°κ΅¬μμ μ°κ΅¬ λμμ λͺ¨λμκ² μλ€λ μ μμ κ΅μ‘μ μμκ° μλ€.This study explores the meaning and effectiveness of Place-based Art education (P-BAE) as a means of developing Environmental Sensitivity (ES), which correlates and predicts Responsible Environmental Behavior (REB). The concentration on P-BAE in this action research was motivated by current arts
classes which are far from utilizing local surroundings as a source of inspiration for art. Art works inspired by places can create a meaningful experience bringing
out ones ecological self and Sense of Place (SoP) such outcomes can increase ones ES.
The research was carried out in two phases.
The first phase was the understanding and researching on the background information on ES, Environmental Art Education, Place, SoP, P-BAE.
Second phase was creating three P-BAE programs and analyzed its effect on the improvement of ES.
As a result of the first programs, despite the fact that it was designed to improve the ES regarding the artificial environment and natural environment
by experiencing local places, ES regarding the two environments failed to increase greatly. Students found more interest on their daily places than the local places.
Learning from the prior attempt, a second program was carried out to improve the ES regarding the activities in natural environment. As a familiar daily places, school was chosen. Then metaphorical artworks were made by experiencing school nature, and the results showed high increase in ES regarding
activities in natural environment.
The third attempt was designed to increase the ES in the fields of environmental pollution and environmental destruction. Students were encouraged to imagine themselves in polluted and destroyed environment. The method of empathy, created an indirect experience for the students to be the
inhabitants of the polluted and damaged environment created an effective improvement on ES.
There are two main findings from the P-BAE programs.
First, the SoP among students has increased. SoP is an emotional attachment, and since the environment comprise different places, an attachment to certain places can lead to increase in attachment to the whole environment.
Secondly, the students ES have improved. Metaphorical artworks, writings, survey statements, and individual interviews confirmed the result. However, less improvements were made in ES other than the focused ES, artificial environment, activities in natural environment and environmental destruction.
Places make up our lives. Our lives are created by meaningful experiences in various places. Through discussions among students on places, and allowing
them to encounter different environments illustrated the possibilities of REB.
In conclusion, the P-BAE has a positive effect on interaction between SoP and improvement of ES, and leads to REB among students.Maste