Change in hepatic volume profile in potential live liver donors after lifestyle modification for reduction of hepatic steatosis

Purpose We aimed to evaluate changes in hepatic volume and hemiliver volume percentage in potential liver donors after hepatic steatosis (HS) reduction through lifestyle modification. Methods Fifty liver donor candidates with HS (macrovesicular fat [MaF] >= 20%) underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) and liver biopsy before (baseline) and after (follow-up) lifestyle modification. According to the change in MaF, subjects were classified as group A (MaF reduction >= 20%, n = 25), and group B (MaF reduction < 20%, n = 25). The hepatic volume and hemiliver volume percentage were measured using CT volumetric analysis. Results Volume percentage of the left hemiliver + S1 (over the whole liver) significantly increased at follow-up in group A (P < 0.001) but not in group B (P = 0.598). The absolute volume change of the right hemiliver and its percentage change from the baseline were significantly greater than those of the left hemiliver + S1 in group A (P < 0.007). There were no significant differences in these values in group B (P = 0.064 and 0.507, respectively). The percentage of subjects that earned the benefit of becoming suitable donors from the change in hepatic volume distribution caused by HS improvement was 52.0% (13/25) and 40.0% (10/25) in group A and group B, respectively. Regarding posthepatectomy liver failure, none was identified in group A after donation, whereas 12% (3/25) was identified in group B. Conclusion Hepatic volume profile may change considerably in potential liver donors with HS (MaF >= 20%) after HS reduction through lifestyle modification. Reevaluation of the hepatic volume is required before liver procurement after lifestyle modification in these subjects

Hepatic volume profiles in potential living liver donors with anomalous right-sided ligamentum teres

Purpose: In living liver donors with rare anatomical anomaly of right-sided ligamentum teres (RSLT), right or left hemiliver procurement is commonly contraindicated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hepatic volume profiles in potential donors with RSLT using semi-automated CT volumetry (CTV). Methods: Among 5535 potential donor candidates in our institution between April 2003 and May 2019, 23 cases of RSLT (0.4%) were included. Proportional liver volumes were measured using semi-automated CTV and compared with those of manual volumetry and intraoperative graft weights (seven surgical cases). Results: The mean percentage volume of the right posterior section was significantly larger than that of the left hemiliver (38.5 ± 8.4% vs. 23.3 ± 5.7%, P < 0.001). Particularly in independent right lateral type, the mean percentage volume of the right posterior section was about two times larger to that of the left hemiliver (41.5% ± 6.5% vs. 21.9% ± 4.4%, P < 0.001), whereas the volume proportions of these two parts were similar between the two parts in bifurcation and trifurcation types (P = 0.810 and 0.979, respectively). Semi-automated CTV of corresponding whole liver, right posterior section, right anterior section, and left hemiliver showed strong correlations with manual CTV (r = 0.989?0.998; P < 0.001). For the seven surgical cases, the graft weights estimated by semi-automated CTV showed a significant correlation with intraoperative graft weights (r = 0.972; P < 0.001). Conclusion: In independent right lateral type of RSLT, the right posterior section tends to be significantly larger than left hemiliver, and may be an alternative option for graft in potential living liver donors with this rare anatomical anomaly