5 research outputs found
νκ΅ λν΅λ Ήμ λμ€νΈμμ λ΅ : μ μμ λν΅λ Ήμ μ μ ν΄μ λμ€μ 리λμμ λΆμμ κ΄ν μ λμ μ κ·Ό
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μ μΉνκ³Ό,2006.Maste
The National Leader Goes Public in Democratized Korea: An Institutional Analysis of the Rising Public Presidency
λ―Όμ£Όν μ΄ν νκ΅μ μΉμμλ ν₯μ νλ λν΅λ Ήμ (the bargaining presidency) κ° λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμμ κ³΅κ³ νλ₯Ό μν νμ μ건 μ€μ νλλ‘ μμ λμ΄μλ€. κ·Έλ¬λ μ΅κ·Ό νκ΅μ μΉμμλ μ μμ λν΅λ Ήμ κ° λΆκ΄΄νμμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ μ λνλ μ μΉ νκ²½μμ μλνλ ν₯μ νλ λν΅λ Ήμ΄ μλλΌοΌ λμ€μ μ§μ νΈμνλ λν΅λ Ήμ λͺ¨μ΅μ΄ λͺ©κ²©λκ³ μλ€. λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ λν΅λ Ήμ λμ€μ ν보λ₯Ό κΉμμΌ νμ λΆ μ΄ν νκ΅μ μΉμ μ λμ λ³νμ μν΄ μ΄μ§λ λν΅λ Ήμ μ λ΅ μ΄λΌλ κ΄μ μμ μ΄ν΄νλ €λ μλμ΄λ€. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ λμ€μ 리λμμ΄ λΆμν μ λμ λ°°κ²½μΌλ‘ λν΅λ Ήμ΄ μΈλ‘ λ° μ¬λΉκ³Ό λ§Ίλ μκ³μ κ΄κ³μ ν΄μ²΄οΌ μ λΉκ°νκ³Ό μμμ¬μ΄λ λν΅λ Ήμ λ±μ₯οΌ λΆμ μ λΆμ μΌμν λ° ν
λ λΉμ μ μ κ±°μ΄λ λμ
κ³Ό μΈν°λ·μ΄λΌλ μλ‘μ΄ ν
ν¬λλ‘μ§μ λ°μ λ° μ μΉμ νμ©μ μ μνλ€. μ΄ μμΈλ€μ μνΈ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ©΄μ μ μΉμ μμμΌλ‘μμ λμ€μ 리λμμ λΆκ°μν€κ³ μλ€. λν΅λ Ήμ λμ€νΈμκ° μ λμ λ³νμ κ²°κ³ΌλΌλ κ²μ λμ€νΈμλ₯Ό λ¨μν λν΅λ Ή κ°μΈμ μ±λ²½ (idiosyncrasy) μ λ¬Έμ λ‘ λ³Ό μ μλ€λ μλ―Έμ΄λ€. μ΄λ₯Ό νμΈνκΈ° μν΄ κΉμμΌοΌ κΉλμ€οΌ λ
Έλ¬΄ν λν΅λ Ήμ μ¬μ μ€ λμ€νΈμλ₯Ό λΉκ΅λΆμν κ²°κ³ΌοΌ ν
λ λΉμ μ°μ€κ³Ό ν΄μΈμλ°©μ μμ΄ λν΅λ Ήμ λμ€μ νλμ΄ λλ ·μ΄ μ¦κ°νκ³ μλ λ°μ λ°ν΄ μΈλ‘ μ μ λ¬κ³Ό ν΄μμ μ λμ μΌλ‘ μμ‘΄ν΄μΌ νλ μΈλ‘ ν견μ 곡μν κ°μ μΆμ΄λ₯Ό 보μλ€. κ²°λ‘ μ μΌλ‘ νκ΅ λν΅λ Ήμ λμ€νΈμλ μ΄λ―Έ μ λνλλ λ¨κ³μ΄λ©°οΌ ν₯ν λν΅λ Ήμ 리λμμμ μ°¨μ§νλ λΉμ€μ λμ± μ»€μ§ κ²μΌλ‘ μμλλ€. μ΄μ λ λν΅λ Ήμ λμ€νΈμμ λ΅μ΄ λν΅λ Ήμ μ κ΅νοΌ μ λΉοΌ μΈλ‘ λ° λμ€μκ² μ΄λ€ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ©° μ μ±
μ κ²°μ κ³Όμ λ° λ΄μ©μ μ΄λ»κ² ꡬμ±νκ³ λ³νμν€λμ§μ λ³΄λ€ μ΄μ μ λ§μΆ νμκ° μλ€.
In the wake of the country's democratization in 1987, bargaining presidency has been often posited as a prerequisite condition for the consolidation of Korean democracy. In recent Korean politics, however, the visible breakdown of "imperial presidency" has not led to the emergence of bargaining presidency which works in a rather institutionalized political setting. Instead, Korean politics witnesses the lise of a presidency directly appealing to the public. The study seeks to explain the president's political style of going public in terms of a strategy rooted in institutional changes that have occurred since the Kim Young-sam administration. The institutional factors which have been conducive to changes in presidential strategy are as follows. First, the power of imperial presidency based on hierarchical control of the press and the president's party has drastically dwindled since the Kim Dae-jung administration though the imperial presidency of the authoritarian past might have kept some vestige even in the current democratic era. Second, due to reform in presidential candidate selection procedure in 2002, outsider politicians popular among the public have advantage over party-based ones in winning the candidacy. Third, the 'routinization of divided government' has intensified partisan conflict. Both sides frequently resort to going-public strategies aimed at favorable positions in the next election. Fourth, technological advances of the Internet and the legal introduction of television campaigning in election have effectively penetrated into day-to-day politics and encouraged the president to go public. Having argued that presidential political style of going public has not simply resulted from the president's personal idiosyncrasy but from major institutional changes, the study further delves into three categories of going public records, such as televised address, press meeting, and overseas travel, regarding three consecutive Presidents Kim Young-sam, Kim Dea-jung, and Roh Moo-hyun. The result shows that televised address and political overseas travel that provide the president with opportunities for standing in front of the public and appealing directly to the public have significantly and consistently increased in their frequency. Meanwhile the frequency of press meeting which concerns the president's relationship with the press much more than with the public has overall decreased. Given the structural conditions for presidential politics, the strategy of going public has now become institutionalized or a significant part of the president's daily exercise of leadership. It is of tremendous importance to seek more systematic understanding about how presidential strategy of going public strategically affects the National Assembly, political parties, the press, public opinion, and the presidency itself, and also about the ways in which such presidential strategy structures or changes the decision making process of public policies