11 research outputs found

    Personalized pricing strategy under inaccurate prediction performance of reservation price

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ๋ฐ•์šฉํƒœ.Due to the development of the digital economy, personalized pricing is getting a lot of attention from both companies and academia. Unlike the past, development of data collection environment, advanced data analysis algorithms, and hardware have made it easier to comprehend the preference of individual consumers, giving the opportunity to companies to predict reservation price of customers and set personalized price to them. Companies are interested in personalized pricing to expand their markets and gain more profit. However, it is impossible to accurately predict the reservation price, and it could cause adverse effects if incorrect prices are presented to consumers due to inaccurate reservation price prediction. Within this context, this study establishes an agent-based model to examine the effect of the personalized pricing strategy according to the prediction accuracy of the reservation price. First of all, the utility function of the consumer including the price is constructed by collecting web data including price, consumer purchase decision, and behavior data. Next, the reservation price of the consumer is derived using the constructed utility function. Finally, an agent-based model considering prediction performance under a personalized pricing strategy is constructed and simulated. The agent-based model is adopted since it has the ability to investigate the effects of prediction performance, reflect customer heterogeneity and interactions under personalized pricing situation. This study offers some important insights into product diffusion under the personalized pricing strategy. First, it provides insights on companies to maximize profits by analyzing the effects of inaccurate prediction situation. Second, it contributes to the existing diffusion research by constructing an agent-based model that includes social influence about personalized prices that were not considered under the existing uniform pricing strategy but should be considered under the personalized pricing strategy. Third, it covers the entire process including data preprocessing, utility function derivation, model establishment, and strategic analysis using actual web data.๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฐœ์ธํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต (personalized pricing)์ด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚ ์—๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ, ๋ถ„์„ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋“ค์˜ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ ์  ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์šฉ์ดํ•ด์ง€๋ฉด์„œ์†Œ๋น„์ž์˜ ์œ ๋ณด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ (reservation price)์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ด์„œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ๋งค๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ฐœ์ธํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต์ด ์‹คํ–‰ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์—…๋“ค์€ ์ด ์ „๋žต์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด์„œ ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ๋„“ํžˆ๊ณ  ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์ต์„ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ์ด ์ฃผ์ œ์— ๋งŽ์€ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์œ ๋ณด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ ๋ณด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์˜ˆ์ธก์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ์—ญํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ–‰์œ„์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจํ˜• (agent-based model)์„ ์„ธ์›Œ ์œ ๋ณด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐœ์ธํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ณผ ์†Œ๋น„ ์ž์˜ ๊ตฌ๋งค ์—ฌ๋ถ€, ํ–‰๋™ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋œ ์›น ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์†Œ๋น„์ž์˜ ํšจ์šฉ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ํšจ์šฉ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์†Œ๋น„์ž์˜ ์œ ๋ณด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋“ค์˜ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ณผ์ •์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ–‰์œ„์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ•ด๋ณธ๋‹ค. ํ–‰์œ„์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจํ˜•์€ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐœ์ธํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ์†Œ๋น„์ž์˜ ์ด์งˆ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฐœ์ธํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ ์ œํ’ˆ ํ™•์‚ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ช‡๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ ๋ณด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์˜ˆ์ธก์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์—…๋“ค์ด ์ˆ˜ ์ต์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ๋กœ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‹จ์ผํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต (uniform pricing)์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฐœ์ธํ™”๋œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์†Œ๋น„์ž ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ํ–‰์œ„์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์›น ์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ, ํšจ์šฉ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋„์ถœ, ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค๋ฆฝ ๋ฐ ์ „๋žต ๋ถ„์„๊นŒ์ง€ ์ „์ฒด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 Personalized pricing 5 2.2 Agent-based models of innovation diffusion 7 Chapter 3 Proposed procedure 9 3.1 Overview 9 3.2 Agent-based model 10 3.3 Prediction performance 12 Chapter 4 Case study 14 4.1 Utility function acquisition 14 4.2 Reservation price derivation 17 4.3 Agent-based modeling 18 Chapter 5 Simulation and discussion 21 5.1 Impact of production cost 22 5.2 Impact of social influence 24 5.3 Impact of reservation price prediction performance 25 Chapter 6 Conclusion 28 Bibliography 30 References 30 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 34Maste

    ํšŒ๋ณต์  ์†Œ๋…„์‚ฌ๋ฒ•์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) --์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๋ฒ•ํ•™๊ณผ,2008. 8.Maste

    (A) Study on the Evaluation Method of Level of Service in Subway Platform

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) --์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ํšํ•™๊ณผ(๊ตํ†ต๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ „๊ณต),2010.2.Maste

    1950๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋‹ค์›์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์žฌ์กฐ๋ช…๋˜๋ฉด์„œ, ๋„์‹œ์™€ ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๋˜๋Š” ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์„ ์ฒดํ—˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ด€๊ด‘, ๋†์ดŒ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋“ฑ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์˜ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์€ ๊ทผ๋Œ€ํ™” ์ดํ›„ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ๋“ญํ•ด์™”๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๋ณด์ „ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ ๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ์›ํ˜•๊ฒฝ๊ด€๋“ค์ด ๋งŽ์ด ํ›ผ์†๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋†์ดŒ๋ชจ์Šต์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„ ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ˜„์‹ค์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, 1950๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ง„๋˜์–ด์˜จ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์€ ์ง€์—ญ์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ฐ„๊ณผํ•˜๊ณ  ์ผ๋ฅ ์ ์ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ง€์—ญ์„ฑ ํŒŒ๊ดด, ๋†์ดŒ์˜ ํš์ผํ™” ๋“ฑ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ํ›ผ์† ๋ฐ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฐ๋Œ€๋ณ„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋ณ€์ฒœ์„ ๋ถ„์„โ€คํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฌธํ—Œ์กฐ์‚ฌ, ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€ 40๊ฐœ ๋งˆ์„์˜ ํ˜„์žฅ์กฐ์‚ฌ, ๋งˆ์„๋ณ„ ์ฃผ๋ฏผ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฃผ์š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, 1950๋…„๋„ ์ดํ›„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—… ์ œ์ •์— ์žˆ์–ด ์ œ๋„โ€ค์ •์ฑ…์  ์ธก๋ฉด, ์‚ฌํšŒโ€ค๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ธก๋ฉด, ๊ตญ์ œโ€ค์ •์น˜์  ์ธก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ƒํ˜ธ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณ์˜จ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์—ฐ๋Œ€๋ณ„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์ด ๋‹น์‹œ ์‚ฌํšŒโ€ค์ •์น˜์  ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋Œ€๋ณ€ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—… ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹œ๋Œ€์  ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์ด ํˆฌ์ž ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…๋ณ„ ํ‰๊ท  ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์€ 90๋…„๋„๋ฅผ ์ตœ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์†Œํญ ํ•˜๋ฝํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๋Œ€๋‹จ์œ„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์—์„œ ์†Œ๊ทœ๋ชจ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…๋“ค๋กœ ์žฌํŽธ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ์ž˜ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—… ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„์ถœํ•œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๋ณ€์ฒœ์˜ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„์€ 1๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋†์—…๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ(1950๋…„๋Œ€~1960๋…„๋Œ€), 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ฃผ๊ฑฐํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ(1970๋…„๋Œ€~1980๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดˆ๋ฐ˜), 3๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ •์ฃผํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ(1980๋…„๋Œ€ ํ›„๋ฐ˜~1990๋…„๋Œ€), 4๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์–ด๋ฉ”๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ์ž์›๋ฐœ๊ตดโ€ค์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ(2000๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„)์˜ 4๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€ 40๊ณณ์˜ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์กฐ์‚ฌ, ํ˜„์žฅ์กฐ์‚ฌ, ์ฃผ๋ฏผ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ 1950๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๋ณ€์ฒœ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฃผ๋ฏผ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋‚ด์šฉ์˜ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์‹œ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์œ ํ˜•๋ณ„ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋†์—…๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์ƒ์‚ฐ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ณผ ๊ฐ€๋กœ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋†’์•˜๊ณ , ์›ํ˜•๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐ ์ฒด๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ง€์†โ€ค์œ ์ง€๋œ ์ฑ„ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์‚ฐ์ง€๊ฐœ๊ฐ„์‚ฌ์—…๊ณผ ๋†๊ฒฝ์ง€ ํ™•์žฅ ์‚ฌ์—…๋งŒ์ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณ์˜จ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๊ฑฐํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋งˆ์„ ์šด๋™์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์›ํ˜•๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ›ผ์† ํ˜น์€ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ด ์‹œ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์ฃผ๊ฑฐ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ณผ ๊ฐ€๋กœ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋†’์•˜๊ณ , ์ง€๋ถ•๊ฐœ๋Ÿ‰์‚ฌ์—…์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ธ๊ณตํ˜• ์ƒ‰์ฑ„ ๋„์ž… ๋ฐ ์Šฌ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ ์ง€๋ถ•์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๋งˆ์„๊ธธ ํ™•โ€คํฌ์žฅ ์‚ฌ์—…์€ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ •์ฃผํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ํƒ์ง€์‚ฌ์—… ๋ฐ ์‹œ์„ค ์ž…์ง€๋กœ ๋„์‹œํ˜• ์ฃผํƒ๋‹จ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์กฐ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ€์˜ฅ, ํŽธ์˜์‹œ์„ค ๋“ฑ ์ฃผ๊ฑฐํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ์™ธ๊ด€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์ฃผ๊ฑฐ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2000๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดํ›„ ์–ด๋ฉ”๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ์ž์›๋ฐœ๊ตดโ€ค์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๊ณ ์กฐ, ๊ด€๊ด‘ํ–‰ํƒœ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋“ฑ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋†์ดŒ๊ด€๊ด‘๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค ๊ตฌ์ถ•์„ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…๋“ค์ด ์ถ”์ง„๋˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ˜„์ƒ์€ ๋…น์ง€๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๊ด€๊ด‘๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค ๋ฐ ํŽธ์˜์‹œ์„ค๋“ค์ด ๋Œ€๊ฑฐ ๋„์ž…๋˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€๋ณ„ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ณ„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ์š”์†Œ์˜ ๋„์ž…, ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ, ์ด์ „, ์†์‹ค, ๋ณต์›, ์œ ์ง€โ€ค๋ณด์ „์˜ 6๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋†์—…๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์œ ์ง€โ€ค๋ณด์ „์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋†’์•˜๊ณ , ์ฃผ๊ฑฐํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ํ›ผ์†์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •์ฃผํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์œ ์ง€โ€ค๋ณด์ „์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์–ด๋ฉ”๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ์ž์›๋ฐœ๊ตดโ€ค์ •๋น„์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ณต์›์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์ด ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋„ท์งธ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•œ ๋ณด์ „ ๋ฐ ๋ณต์› ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋Š” ๋†์ดŒ์˜ ์›ํ˜•๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ณผ ํ˜„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋น„๊ตโ€ค๊ณ ์ฐฐ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ ์š”์ธ, ๋ณ€ํ™” ์ฃผ๊ธฐ, ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์ง•์—์„œ ์ƒ์ดํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๋†์ดŒ ์›ํ˜•๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผ ์กฐํ™” ์ค‘์‹œ, ์ง€ํ˜•โ€ค์ง€์„ธ์— ์ˆœ์‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ํ˜•์„ฑ, ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ, ์œ„๊ณ„์  ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์งˆ์„œ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ํ˜„์žฌ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž์—ฐํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋Œ€๋น„๋˜๋Š” ์ง์„ ํ˜• ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์‹œ์„ค ์„ค์น˜, ์ฑ„๋„ ๋†’์€ ์ƒ‰์ฑ„ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ์ธ๊ณต ์†Œ์žฌ ๋„์ž…, ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ํ˜•์„ฑ, ์›ํ˜•๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋Œ€๊ฑฐ ํ›ผ์† ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ์น˜, ์™ธ๋ถ€์ธ๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋“ฑ์ด ํŠน์ง•์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋†์ดŒ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์ถ”์ง„์œผ๋กœ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ›ผ์†โ€ค๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ์‹œ๊ฐ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋ณด์ „ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ, ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ณ„ํš์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ํƒˆํ”ผํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์ „ํ˜• ๊ณ„ํš์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์ดํ–‰์„ ์ด‰๊ตฌํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€์˜ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ณด์ „์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ณผ ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•œ ๋†์ดŒ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•œ๋‹ค.As the pluralistic value of rural landscapes has been refocused recently, the interest and demand on rural landscapes have been increased such as rural tourism and visits of rural districts to have the rural experience differentiated from urban landscape. However, because rural landscape has been changed since the modernization, the inherent prototype landscape which should be preserved was damaged much in Korea and it is very different from the past rural landscape now. In particular, rural development projects which have been intensively carried out since the 1950s overlooked regional characteristics and stuck to the uniform development approach. As a result, it gave the dominant impact on damage and changes in rural landscape such as destruction of locality and uniformity of rural districts. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to present the implications on desirable rural landscape planning and management by analyzing and assessing the transition of rural landscape according to the impact of chronological rural development projects. In order to achieve the goal, literature search, an on-the-spot survey of 40 towns as targets for this study, interviews with residents in each town were performed in this study and key findings are summarized as follows. Firstly, results of analysis of background for occurrence of rural development projects since 1950s showed that changes in aspects of system and policy, aspects of society and economics, and international and political aspects mutually and complexly affected the rural development projects upon establishing it. It implied that characteristics of chronological rural development project represented the flow of society and politics at the time. In addition, in terms of analysis of contents of rural development project, total investment budget in rural development projects has been increased based on the historical flow, but the average budget for each rural development project tended to decline a little bit in 1990s as the starting point. It implied the recent trends were restructured by switching from the large-scale development projects to the small-scale development projects. Stages of rural landscape transition derived through analysis of background and contents for occurrence of rural development project could be classified into stage 1, the period of reorganization of rural infrastructure(1950s~1960s), stage 2, the period of reorganization of residential environment(1970s~early 1980s), stage 3, the period of reorganization of settlement environment(late 1980s~1990s), and stage 4, the period of excavation and reorganization of amenity resources(after 2000s). Secondly, the contents of transitions of rural landscape from 1950s up to date were identified through literature search for 40 targeting towns, on-the-spot survey and interviews with residents. The frequency analysis of contents of changes derived from interviews with residents was additionally performed to characteristics of changes depending on each type of landscape. As a result of analysis, in the period of reorganization of rural infrastructure, the proportion of changes in 'cultivation landscape' and 'streetscape' got higher. While factors and system of prototype landscape were continued and maintained, only some hill slope reclamation and farmland expansion projects affected it. In the period of reorganization of residential environment, the impact of new community movement was the representative example and its impact undermined and changed factors and forms of prototype landscape very much. Especially at this moment, the proportion of changes in residential landscapes and streetscape was high and introduction of artificial colors, changes into the slate roof and expansion and paved road projects results in structural changes in rural landscapes. The characteristic changes in the period of reorganization of settlement environment included composition of urban residential complex with large scale land for housing project and location of facilities. It showed that the proportion of changes in residential landscape' focusing on improvements on appearance of residential environment such as houses and amenities got higher. In the period of excavation and reorganization of amenity resources after 2000s, the related development projects with main goal to establish the rural tourism infrastructure have been performed due to impact of social flow such as heightened concern for the rural landscape and changes in tourism form. In particular, it was the main background to massively introduce the tourism infrastructure and amenities in the area of green landscape. Thirdly, based on aggregated results from interviews for each target land, chronological trends of changes in rural landscape were identified. It could be explained by six types of landscape factors such as formation, 'change', 'transfer, 'loss', 'restoration' and 'maintenance & preservation. In the period of reorganization of rural infrastructure, the proportion of maintenance & preservation was higher but in the period of reorganization of residential environment, the proportion of change' and damage have rapidly increased. In the period of reorganization of settlement environment, the proportion of maintenance & preservation tended to sharply decline and in the period of excavation and reorganization of amenity resources, the proportion of restoration has been increased. Fourthly, the rural prototype landscape which has been proposed as the direction of desirable maintenance was compared and analyzed with current regular rural landscape in Korea and big differences in landscape forming factor, change cycle and physical characteristics were shown. The main physical features of the rural prototype landscape included the harmony with nature, formation of landscape to comply with terrain / topography, contiguous configuration of space and the hierarchical spatial order. The main features of current rural landscape included the linear spatial configuration and installation of large-scale facilities in contrast to the natural environment, application of color with high chroma, introduction of artificial material, formation of landscape caused by economic logic, massive corruption and negligence of traditional landscapes and formation of a space for outsiders. This paper combining with above findings showed the critical view of rural landscape which were rapidly corrupted and changed due to the rural development project and emphasized the value of the rural landscape supposed to be preserved. In addition, this paper claimed that we should perform the preservation type planning for future rural landscape while moving away from the traditional approach. In this context, this paper can contribute to establish the basic data to continue to preserve the rural landscape as well as planning and management for the desired future of rural landscape.Docto

    (A) Study on the Indicators for Visual Landscape Planning of Landscape Agricultural Region

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) --์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ƒํƒœ์กฐ๊ฒฝยท์ง€์—ญ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€(์ƒํƒœ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™), 2009.2.Maste
    corecore