8 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Experimental and numerical study of rate-dependent mode-I failure of a structural adhesive
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s).. We present an experimental and numerical study of the rate dependence of the mode-I failure of adhesive joints, focussing on aluminium plates bonded with Araldite® 2015. For the experimental part, we tested 24 double-cantilever beams (DCB) at six different prescribed speeds, from 0.1 to 5000 mm/min. The numerical simulations use a previously proposed cohesive-zone model (CZM) based on fractional viscoelasticity and a novel finite element combining a Timoshenko beam and an interface element. The CZM had previously been validated for a rubber interface, so here we present a procedure to identify its input parameters and validate its capability to predict the failure of joints made with an epoxy adhesive. An effective procedure is also developed to evaluate the dependence of the fracture energy on the crack speed without experimentally measuring the crack speed. The adhesive response was found to be markedly rate dependent. Within the range of tested speeds, the fracture energy of the adhesive more than doubles its value and the shape of the ‘fracture energy-crack speed’ curve resembles a sigmoidal shape, but more tests are needed at higher speeds to better determine the maximum value of the fracture energy and the actual shape of the complete curve.European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 701032
Recommended from our members
On characterising fracture resistance in mode-I delamination
In this work we focus on the mode-I quasi-static crack propagation in adhesive joints or composite laminates. For this problems a number of di ff erent standards have been approved. The most widely used are based on the double cantilever beam (DCB) test and on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) but di ff er in some aspects of the testing procedure and the recommended data-reduction schemes. The applicability of these methods is still a matter of debate in the scientific community, particularly in the case of ductile interfaces. We revisit the accuracy of the most used standards and compare it with other methods based on either LEFM or J-integral theory. All the methods analysed in our work are based on either Euler-Bernoulli or Timoshenko beam theories. We present a number of numerical examples where we compare di ff erent expressions for fracture resistance obtained with di ff erent methods. The input for the analysis, which includes applied load, cross-head displacement and rotation, crack length and cohesive zone length, is obtained from the numerical model which simulates real experiments. In these simulations, we use a Timoshenko beam model with a bi-linear CZM, which allows us accurate comparison with analytical formulas for fracture resistance based on Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam theory
Recommended from our members
Enhanced simple beam theory for characterising mode-I fracture resistance via a double cantilever beam test
We study a double-cantilever beam (DCB), in which either the crack-mouth opening displacement or the end rotations are prescribed, in the linear-elastic-fracture-mechanics (LEFM) limit of an infinitely stiff and brittle interface.Wepresentanovel,yetextremelysimple,derivationoftheclosed-formsolutionofthisproblemwhen thearmsaremodelledwithTimoshenkobeamtheory.Weremovetheassumptionthatthecrosssectionsofthe DCB arms are assumed not to rotate (i.e. that they are clamped) at the crack tip, which is made in so-called ‘simple beam theory’(SBT).Therefore, with our‘ enhanced simple beam theory’(ESBT),in front of the crack tip, cross section sareallowedtorotate,althoughthebeamaxisstaysundeformed.Thus,wecandeterminethecracktiprotationcausedbythedeformationofthebeaminfrontofthecracktipalsointheLEFMlimit.Asaresult, mostoftheinaccuraciesoftheSBTareeliminated,withouttheneedforacrack-length correction, use dinthe ‘corrected beam theory’(CBT).Inthisway,wecanderiveaveryaccuratedatareductionformulaforthecritical energy release rate, Gc, which does not require the measurement of the crack length, unlike CBT. In our numerical results we show that, compared to the most effective data reduction methods currently available (including CBT), our formula is either as accurate or more accurate for the case of brittle delamination of thick compositeplates,inwhichsheardeformabilitycanplayasignificantrole
Recommended from our members
Characterisation of mode-I fracture resistance of adhesive layers with imperfections
Supplementary data are available on Brunelfigshare at: https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.25444726 [under a CC BY 4.0 license].In this work, a novel procedure to evaluate the influence of imperfections at the interface (such as voids and interfacial failure) on the fracture resistance of adhesive joints in mode-I debonding is proposed, based on an image-processing analysis of the crack surface. Its application to the characterisation of fracture resistance of aluminium DCB specimens bonded with an epoxy adhesive leads to a more accurate evaluation of the ‘effective’ fracture resistance by taking into account the distribution of imperfections along the interface, therefore also confirming that the typical oscillations and drops in the load–displacement curve can be attributed to the imperfections.TThis research is part of the project MOLAY-STRUDEL, funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement N. 701032
Recommended from our members
Complete analytical solutions for double cantilever beam specimens with bi-linear quasi-brittle and brittle interfaces
In thiswork we develop a complete analytical
solution for a double cantilever beam (DCB) where
the arms are modelled as Timoshenko beams, and a
bi-linear cohesive-zone model (CZM) is embedded at
the interface. The solution is given for two types of
DCB; one with prescribed rotations (with steady-state
crack propagation) and one with prescribed displacement
(where the crack propagation is not steady state).
Because the CZM is bi-linear, the analytical solutions
are given separately in three phases, namely (i) linearelastic
behaviour before crack propagation, (ii) damage
growth before crack propagation and (iii) crack propagation.
These solutions are then used to derive the
solutions for the casewhen the interface is linear-elastic
with brittle failure (i.e. no damage growth before crack
propagation) and the case with infinitely stiff interface
with brittle failure (corresponding to linear-elastic fracture
mechanics (LEFM) solutions). If the DCB arms
are shear-deformable, our solution correctly captures
the fact that they will rotate at the crack tip and in front of it even if the interface is infinitely stiff. Expressions
defining the distribution of contact tractions at the interface,
as well as shear forces, bending moments and
cross-sectional rotations of the arms, at and in front
of the crack tip, are derived for a linear-elastic interface
with brittle failure and in the LEFM limit. For a
DCB with prescribed displacement in the LEFM limit
we also derive a closed-form expression for the critical
energy release rate, Gc. This formula, compared
to the so-called ‘standard beam theory’ formula based
on the assumptions that the DCB arms are clamped at
the crack tip (and also used in standards for determining
fracture toughness in mode-I delamination), has an
additional term which takes into account the rotation
at the crack tip. Additionally, we provide all the mentioned
analytical solutions for the case when the shear
stiffness of the arms is infinitely high, which corresponds
to Euler–Bernoulli beam theory. In the numerical
examples we compare results for Euler–Beronulli
and Timoshenko beam theory and analyse the influence
of the CZM parameters
On the Effectiveness of Higher-Order One-Dimensional Models for Physically Nonlinear Problems
The chapter presents numerical assessments of physically nonlinear
problems through a class of refined one-dimensional theories based on the Carrera
Unified Formulation (CUF). CUF is a hierarchical formulation to generate refined
structural theories through a variable kinematic approach. Physical nonlinearities
include von Mises plasticity and cohesive interface modeling for delamination of
composites. This work aims to provide insights into the effect of kinematic enrichment
on the overall nonlinear behavior of the structure. Guidelines stem from the
evaluation of the accuracy and numerical efficiency of the proposed models against
analytical and numerical approaches from the literature