35,739 research outputs found
Portfolio selection problems in practice: a comparison between linear and quadratic optimization models
Several portfolio selection models take into account practical limitations on
the number of assets to include and on their weights in the portfolio. We
present here a study of the Limited Asset Markowitz (LAM), of the Limited Asset
Mean Absolute Deviation (LAMAD) and of the Limited Asset Conditional
Value-at-Risk (LACVaR) models, where the assets are limited with the
introduction of quantity and cardinality constraints. We propose a completely
new approach for solving the LAM model, based on reformulation as a Standard
Quadratic Program and on some recent theoretical results. With this approach we
obtain optimal solutions both for some well-known financial data sets used by
several other authors, and for some unsolved large size portfolio problems. We
also test our method on five new data sets involving real-world capital market
indices from major stock markets. Our computational experience shows that,
rather unexpectedly, it is easier to solve the quadratic LAM model with our
algorithm, than to solve the linear LACVaR and LAMAD models with CPLEX, one of
the best commercial codes for mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problems.
Finally, on the new data sets we have also compared, using out-of-sample
analysis, the performance of the portfolios obtained by the Limited Asset
models with the performance provided by the unconstrained models and with that
of the official capital market indices
Can Google Trends search queries contribute to risk diversification?
Portfolio diversification and active risk management are essential parts of
financial analysis which became even more crucial (and questioned) during and
after the years of the Global Financial Crisis. We propose a novel approach to
portfolio diversification using the information of searched items on Google
Trends. The diversification is based on an idea that popularity of a stock
measured by search queries is correlated with the stock riskiness. We penalize
the popular stocks by assigning them lower portfolio weights and we bring
forward the less popular, or peripheral, stocks to decrease the total riskiness
of the portfolio. Our results indicate that such strategy dominates both the
benchmark index and the uniformly weighted portfolio both in-sample and
out-of-sample.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figure
- …