5 research outputs found

    Weak saturation numbers in random graphs

    Full text link
    For two given graphs GG and FF, a graph H H is said to be weakly (G,F) (G, F) -saturated if HH is a spanning subgraph of G G which has no copy of FF as a subgraph and one can add all edges in E(G)E(H) E(G)\setminus E(H) to H H in some order so that a new copy of FF is created at each step. The weak saturation number wsat(G,F) wsat(G, F) is the minimum number of edges of a weakly (G,F)(G, F)-saturated graph. In this paper, we deal with the relation between wsat(G(n,p),F) wsat(G(n,p), F) and wsat(Kn,F) wsat(K_n, F), where G(n,p)G(n,p) denotes the Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi random graph and Kn K_n denotes the complete graph on n n vertices. For every graph F F and constant p p, we prove that wsat(G(n,p),F)=wsat(Kn,F)(1+o(1)) wsat( G(n,p),F)= wsat(K_n,F)(1+o(1)) with high probability. Also, for some graphs F F including complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and connected graphs with minimum degree 1 1 or 2 2, it is shown that there exists an ε(F)>0 \varepsilon(F)>0 such that, for any pnε(F)logn p\geqslant n^{-\varepsilon(F)}\log n, wsat(G(n,p),F)=wsat(Kn,F) wsat( G(n,p),F)= wsat(K_n,F) with high probability

    The weak saturation number of K2,t\boldsymbol{K_{2, t}}

    Full text link
    For two graphs GG and FF, we say that GG is weakly FF-saturated if GG contains no copy of FF as a subgraph and one could join all the nonadjacent pairs of vertices of GG in some order so that a new copy of FF is created at each step. The weak saturation number wsat(n,F)\mathrm{wsat}(n, F) is the minimum number of edges of a weakly FF-saturated graph on nn vertices. In this paper, we examine wsat(n,Ks,t)\mathrm{wsat}(n, K_{s, t}), where Ks,tK_{s, t} is the complete bipartite graph with parts of sizes ss and t t . We determine wsat(n,K2,t)\mathrm{wsat}(n, K_{2, t}), correcting a previous report in the literature. It is also shown that wsat(s+t,Ks,t)=(s+t12)\mathrm{wsat}(s+t, K_{s,t})=\binom{s+t-1}{2} if gcd(s,t)=1\gcd(s, t)=1 and wsat(s+t,Ks,t)=(s+t12)+1\mathrm{wsat}(s+t, K_{s,t})=\binom{s+t-1}{2}+1, otherwise

    Weak Saturation Numbers for Sparse Graphs

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/speccoll-faudreerj/1158/thumbnail.jp

    Weak Saturation Numbers for Sparse Graphs

    No full text
    For a fixed graph F, a graph G is F-saturated if there is no copy of F in G, but for any edge e ∉ G, there is a copy of F in G + e. The minimum number of edges in an F-saturated graph of order n will be denoted by sat(n, F). A graph G is weakly F-saturated if there is an ordering of the missing edges of G so that if they are added one at a time, each edge added creates a new copy of F. The minimum size of a weakly F-saturated graph G of order n will be denoted by wsat(n, F). The graphs of order n that are weakly F-saturated will be denoted by wSAT(n, F), and those graphs in wSAT(n, F) with wsat(n, F) edges will be denoted by wSAT(n, F). The precise value of wsat(n, T) for many families of sparse graphs, and in particular for many trees, will be determined. More specifically, families of trees for which wsat(n, T) = |T|−2 will be determined. The maximum and minimum values of wsat(n, T) for the class of all trees will be given. Some properties of wsat(n, T) and wSAT(n, T) for trees will be discussed. Keywords: saturated graphs, sparse graphs, weak saturation
    corecore