The inapproximability for the (0,1)-additive number

An {\it additive labeling} of a graph $G$ is a function $\ell :V(G) \rightarrow\mathbb{N}$, such that for every two adjacent vertices $v$ and $u$ of $G$, $\sum_{w \sim v}\ell(w)\neq \sum_{w \sim u}\ell(w)$ ($x \sim y$ means that $x$ is joined to $y$). The {\it additive number} of $G$, denoted by $\eta(G)$, is the minimum number $k$ such that $G$ has a additive labeling $\ell :V(G) \rightarrow \mathbb{N}_k$. The {\it additive choosability} of a graph $G$, denoted by $\eta_{\ell}(G)$, is the smallest number $k$ such that $G$ has an additive labeling for any assignment of lists of size $k$ to the vertices of $G$, such that the label of each vertex belongs to its own list. Seamone (2012) \cite{a80} conjectured that for every graph $G$, $\eta(G)= \eta_{\ell}(G)$. We give a negative answer to this conjecture and we show that for every $k$ there is a graph $G$ such that $\eta_{\ell}(G)- \eta(G) \geq k$. A {\it $(0,1)$-additive labeling} of a graph $G$ is a function $\ell :V(G) \rightarrow\{0,1\}$, such that for every two adjacent vertices $v$ and $u$ of $G$, $\sum_{w \sim v}\ell(w)\neq \sum_{w \sim u}\ell(w)$. A graph may lack any $(0,1)$-additive labeling. We show that it is $\mathbf{NP}$-complete to decide whether a $(0,1)$-additive labeling exists for some families of graphs such as perfect graphs and planar triangle-free graphs. For a graph $G$ with some $(0,1)$-additive labelings, the $(0,1)$-additive number of $G$ is defined as $\sigma_{1} (G) = \min_{\ell \in \Gamma}\sum_{v\in V(G)}\ell(v)$ where $\Gamma$ is the set of $(0,1)$-additive labelings of $G$. We prove that given a planar graph that admits a $(0,1)$-additive labeling, for all $\varepsilon >0$, approximating the $(0,1)$-additive number within $n^{1-\varepsilon}$ is $\mathbf{NP}$-hard.Comment: 14 pages, 3 figures, Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Scienc

Sequence variations of the 1-2-3 Conjecture and irregularity strength

Karonski, Luczak, and Thomason (2004) conjectured that, for any connected graph G on at least three vertices, there exists an edge weighting from {1,2,3} such that adjacent vertices receive different sums of incident edge weights. Bartnicki, Grytczuk, and Niwcyk (2009) made a stronger conjecture, that each edge's weight may be chosen from an arbitrary list of size 3 rather than {1,2,3}. We examine a variation of these conjectures, where each vertex is coloured with a sequence of edge weights. Such a colouring relies on an ordering of the graph's edges, and so two variations arise -- one where we may choose any ordering of the edges and one where the ordering is fixed. In the former case, we bound the list size required for any graph. In the latter, we obtain a bound on list sizes for graphs with sufficiently large minimum degree. We also extend our methods to a list variation of irregularity strength, where each vertex receives a distinct sequence of edge weights.Comment: Accepted to Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Scienc