515 research outputs found

    Sketching Cuts in Graphs and Hypergraphs

    Full text link
    Sketching and streaming algorithms are in the forefront of current research directions for cut problems in graphs. In the streaming model, we show that (1ϵ)(1-\epsilon)-approximation for Max-Cut must use n1O(ϵ)n^{1-O(\epsilon)} space; moreover, beating 4/54/5-approximation requires polynomial space. For the sketching model, we show that rr-uniform hypergraphs admit a (1+ϵ)(1+\epsilon)-cut-sparsifier (i.e., a weighted subhypergraph that approximately preserves all the cuts) with O(ϵ2n(r+logn))O(\epsilon^{-2} n (r+\log n)) edges. We also make first steps towards sketching general CSPs (Constraint Satisfaction Problems)

    A Linear-time Algorithm for Sparsification of Unweighted Graphs

    Full text link
    Given an undirected graph GG and an error parameter ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, the {\em graph sparsification} problem requires sampling edges in GG and giving the sampled edges appropriate weights to obtain a sparse graph GϵG_{\epsilon} with the following property: the weight of every cut in GϵG_{\epsilon} is within a factor of (1±ϵ)(1\pm \epsilon) of the weight of the corresponding cut in GG. If GG is unweighted, an O(mlogn)O(m\log n)-time algorithm for constructing GϵG_{\epsilon} with O(nlogn/ϵ2)O(n\log n/\epsilon^2) edges in expectation, and an O(m)O(m)-time algorithm for constructing GϵG_{\epsilon} with O(nlog2n/ϵ2)O(n\log^2 n/\epsilon^2) edges in expectation have recently been developed (Hariharan-Panigrahi, 2010). In this paper, we improve these results by giving an O(m)O(m)-time algorithm for constructing GϵG_{\epsilon} with O(nlogn/ϵ2)O(n\log n/\epsilon^2) edges in expectation, for unweighted graphs. Our algorithm is optimal in terms of its time complexity; further, no efficient algorithm is known for constructing a sparser GϵG_{\epsilon}. Our algorithm is Monte-Carlo, i.e. it produces the correct output with high probability, as are all efficient graph sparsification algorithms

    Distributed Minimum Cut Approximation

    Full text link
    We study the problem of computing approximate minimum edge cuts by distributed algorithms. We use a standard synchronous message passing model where in each round, O(logn)O(\log n) bits can be transmitted over each edge (a.k.a. the CONGEST model). We present a distributed algorithm that, for any weighted graph and any ϵ(0,1)\epsilon \in (0, 1), with high probability finds a cut of size at most O(ϵ1λ)O(\epsilon^{-1}\lambda) in O(D)+O~(n1/2+ϵ)O(D) + \tilde{O}(n^{1/2 + \epsilon}) rounds, where λ\lambda is the size of the minimum cut. This algorithm is based on a simple approach for analyzing random edge sampling, which we call the random layering technique. In addition, we also present another distributed algorithm, which is based on a centralized algorithm due to Matula [SODA '93], that with high probability computes a cut of size at most (2+ϵ)λ(2+\epsilon)\lambda in O~((D+n)/ϵ5)\tilde{O}((D+\sqrt{n})/\epsilon^5) rounds for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0. The time complexities of both of these algorithms almost match the Ω~(D+n)\tilde{\Omega}(D + \sqrt{n}) lower bound of Das Sarma et al. [STOC '11], thus leading to an answer to an open question raised by Elkin [SIGACT-News '04] and Das Sarma et al. [STOC '11]. Furthermore, we also strengthen the lower bound of Das Sarma et al. by extending it to unweighted graphs. We show that the same lower bound also holds for unweighted multigraphs (or equivalently for weighted graphs in which O(wlogn)O(w\log n) bits can be transmitted in each round over an edge of weight ww), even if the diameter is D=O(logn)D=O(\log n). For unweighted simple graphs, we show that even for networks of diameter O~(1λnαλ)\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\lambda}\cdot \sqrt{\frac{n}{\alpha\lambda}}), finding an α\alpha-approximate minimum cut in networks of edge connectivity λ\lambda or computing an α\alpha-approximation of the edge connectivity requires Ω~(D+nαλ)\tilde{\Omega}(D + \sqrt{\frac{n}{\alpha\lambda}}) rounds

    Graph Sparsification by Edge-Connectivity and Random Spanning Trees

    Full text link
    We present new approaches to constructing graph sparsifiers --- weighted subgraphs for which every cut has the same value as the original graph, up to a factor of (1±ϵ)(1 \pm \epsilon). Our first approach independently samples each edge uvuv with probability inversely proportional to the edge-connectivity between uu and vv. The fact that this approach produces a sparsifier resolves a question posed by Bencz\'ur and Karger (2002). Concurrent work of Hariharan and Panigrahi also resolves this question. Our second approach constructs a sparsifier by forming the union of several uniformly random spanning trees. Both of our approaches produce sparsifiers with O(nlog2(n)/ϵ2)O(n \log^2(n)/\epsilon^2) edges. Our proofs are based on extensions of Karger's contraction algorithm, which may be of independent interest
    corecore