7,856 research outputs found

    Total [1,2]-domination in graphs

    Full text link
    A subset SβŠ†VS\subseteq V in a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a total [1,2][1,2]-set if, for every vertex v∈Vv\in V, 1β‰€βˆ£N(v)∩Sβˆ£β‰€21\leq |N(v)\cap S|\leq 2. The minimum cardinality of a total [1,2][1,2]-set of GG is called the total [1,2][1,2]-domination number, denoted by Ξ³t[1,2](G)\gamma_{t[1,2]}(G). We establish two sharp upper bounds on the total [1,2]-domination number of a graph GG in terms of its order and minimum degree, and characterize the corresponding extremal graphs achieving these bounds. Moreover, we give some sufficient conditions for a graph without total [1,2][1,2]-set and for a graph with the same total [1,2][1,2]-domination number, [1,2][1,2]-domination number and domination number.Comment: 17 page

    Hypo-efficient domination and hypo-unique domination

    Full text link
    For a graph GG let Ξ³(G)\gamma (G) be its domination number. We define a graph G to be (i) a hypo-efficient domination graph (or a hypo-ED\mathcal{ED} graph) if GG has no efficient dominating set (EDS) but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from GG has at least one EDS, and (ii) a hypo-unique domination graph (a hypo-UD\mathcal{UD} graph) if GG has at least two minimum dominating sets,but Gβˆ’vG-v has a unique minimum dominating set for each v∈V(G)v\in V(G). We show that each hypo-UD\mathcal{UD} graph GG of order at least 33 is connected and Ξ³(Gβˆ’v)<Ξ³(G)\gamma(G-v) < \gamma(G) for all v∈V(G)v \in V(G). We obtain a tight upper bound on the order of a hypo-P\mathcal{P} graph in terms of the domination number and maximum degree of the graph, where P∈{UD,ED}\mathcal{P} \in \{\mathcal{UD}, \mathcal{ED}\}. Families of circulant graphs which achieve these bounds are presented. We also prove that the bondage number of any hypo-UD\mathcal{UD} graph is not more than the minimum degree plus one.Comment: 13 pages, 1 figur

    Bounding and approximating minimum maximal matchings in regular graphs

    Full text link
    The edge domination number Ξ³e(G)\gamma_e(G) of a graph GG is the minimum size of a maximal matching in GG. It is well known that this parameter is computationally very hard, and several approximation algorithms and heuristics have been studied. In the present paper, we provide best possible upper bounds on Ξ³e(G)\gamma_e(G) for regular and non-regular graphs GG in terms of their order and maximum degree. Furthermore, we discuss algorithmic consequences of our results and their constructive proofs

    The bondage number of graphs on topological surfaces: degree-S vertices and the average degree

    Full text link
    The bondage number b(G)b(G) of a graph GG is the smallest number of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with larger domination number. An orientable surface Sh\mathbb{S}_h of genus hh, hβ‰₯0h \geq 0, is obtained from the sphere S0\mathbb{S}_0 by adding hh handles. A non-orientable surface Nq\mathbb{N}_q of genus qq, qβ‰₯1q \geq 1, is obtained from the sphere by adding qq crosscaps. The Euler characteristic of a surface is defined by Ο‡(Sh)=2βˆ’2h\chi(\mathbb{S}_h) = 2 - 2h and Ο‡(Sq)=2βˆ’q\chi(\mathbb{S}_q)= 2-q. Let GG be a connected graph of order nn which is 2-cell embedded on a surface M\mathbb{M} with Ο‡(M)=Ο‡\chi(\mathbb{M})= \chi. We prove that b(G)≀7+ib(G) \leq 7+i when M=Ni\mathbb{M} = \mathbb{N}_i, i=1,2,3i=1,2,3, and b(G)≀12b(G) \leq 12 when M∈{N4,S2}\mathbb{M} \in \{\mathbb{N}_4, \mathbb{S}_2\}. We give new arguments that improve the known upper bounds on the bondage number at least when βˆ’7Ο‡/(Ξ΄(G)βˆ’5)<nβ‰€βˆ’12Ο‡-7\chi/(\delta(G) - 5) < n \leq -12\chi, Ξ΄(G)β‰₯6\delta(G) \geq 6, where Ξ΄(G)\delta(G) is the minimum degree of GG. We obtain sufficient conditions for the validity of the inequality b(G)≀2sβˆ’2b(G) \leq 2s-2, provided GG has degree ss vertices. In particular, we prove that if Ξ΄(G)=Ξ΄β‰₯6\delta (G) = \delta \geq 6, Ο‡β‰€βˆ’1\chi \leq -1 and βˆ’14Ο‡<Ξ΄βˆ’4+2(Ξ΄βˆ’5)n-14\chi < \delta - 4 + 2(\delta -5)n then b(G)≀2Ξ΄βˆ’2b(G) \leq 2\delta -2. We show that if Ξ³(G)=Ξ³=ΜΈ2\gamma (G) = \gamma \not = 2, where Ξ³(G)\gamma (G) is the domination number of GG, then nβ‰₯Ξ³+(1+9+8Ξ³βˆ’8Ο‡)/2n \geq \gamma + (1 + \sqrt{9+8\gamma-8\chi})/2; the bound is tight. We also present upper bounds for the bondage number of graphs in terms of the girth, domination number and Euler characteristic. As a corollary we prove that if Ξ³(G)β‰₯4\gamma(G) \geq 4 and Ο‡β‰€βˆ’1\chi \leq -1, then b(G)≀11βˆ’24Ο‡/(9+41βˆ’8Ο‡)b(G) \leq 11 - 24\chi/(9 + \sqrt{41 - 8\chi}). Several unanswered questions are posed.Comment: 17 pages, 3 figure

    On Bondage Numbers of Graphs -- a survey with some comments

    Full text link
    The bondage number of a nonempty graph GG is the cardinality of a smallest edge set whose removal from GG results in a graph with domination number greater than the domination number of GG. This lecture gives a survey on the bondage number, including the known results, problems and conjectures. We also summarize other types of bondage numbers.Comment: 80 page; 14 figures; 120 reference

    Lower Bounds for the Domination Numbers of Connected Graphs without Short Cycles

    Full text link
    In this paper, we obtain lower bounds for the domination numbers of connected graphs with girth at least 77. We show that the domination number of a connected graph with girth at least 77 is either 11 or at least 12(3+8(mβˆ’n)+9)\frac{1}{2}(3+\sqrt{8(m-n)+9}), where nn is the number of vertices in the graph and mm is the number of edges in the graph. For graphs with minimum degree 22 and girth at least 77, the lower bound can be improved to max⁑{n,2m3}\max{\{\sqrt{n}, \sqrt{\frac{2m}{3}}\}}, where nn and mm are the numbers of vertices and edges in the graph respectively. In cases where the graph is of minimum degree 22 and its girth gg is at least 1212, the lower bound can be further improved to max⁑{n,⌊g3βŒ‹βˆ’13m}\max{\{\sqrt{n}, \sqrt{\frac{\lfloor \frac{g}{3} \rfloor-1}{3}m}\}}

    Bounds on the connected forcing number of a graph

    Full text link
    In this paper, we study (zero) forcing sets which induce connected subgraphs of a graph. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the connected forcing number of the graph. We provide sharp upper and lower bounds on the connected forcing number in terms of the minimum degree, maximum degree, girth, and order of the graph

    Upper bounds for domination related parameters in graphs on surfaces

    Full text link
    In this paper we give tight upper bounds on the total domination number, the weakly connected domination number and the connected domination number of a graph in terms of order and Euler characteristic. We also present upper bounds for the restrained bondage number, the total restrained bondage number and the restricted edge connectivity of graphs in terms of the orientable/nonorientable genus and maximum degree.Comment: 10 page

    Directed Domination in Oriented Graphs

    Full text link
    A directed dominating set in a directed graph DD is a set SS of vertices of VV such that every vertex u∈V(D)βˆ–Su \in V(D) \setminus S has an adjacent vertex vv in SS with vv directed to uu. The directed domination number of DD, denoted by Ξ³(D)\gamma(D), is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in DD. The directed domination number of a graph GG, denoted Ξ“d(G)\Gamma_d(G), which is the maximum directed domination number Ξ³(D)\gamma(D) over all orientations DD of GG. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by Erd\"{o}s [Math. Gaz. 47 (1963), 220--222], albeit in disguised form. We extend this notion to directed domination of all graphs. If Ξ±\alpha denotes the independence number of a graph GG, we show that if GG is a bipartite graph, we show that Ξ“d(G)=Ξ±\Gamma_d(G) = \alpha. We present several lower and upper bounds on the directed domination number.Comment: 18 page

    Partial domination - the isolation number of a graph

    Full text link
    We prove the following result: If GG be a connected graph on nβ‰₯6n \ge 6 vertices, then there exists a set of vertices DD with ∣Dβˆ£β‰€n3|D| \le \frac{n}{3} and such that V(G)βˆ–N[D]V(G) \setminus N[D] is an independent set, where N[D]N[D] is the closed neighborhood of DD. Furthermore, the bound is sharp. This seems to be the first result in the direction of partial domination with constrained structure on the graph induced by the non-dominated vertices, which we further elaborate in this paper.Comment: 28 page
    • …
    corecore