3 research outputs found

    Upper bound on cubicity in terms of boxicity for graphs of low chromatic number

    Full text link
    The boxicity (respectively cubicity) of a graph GG is the minimum non-negative integer kk, such that GG can be represented as an intersection graph of axis-parallel kk-dimensional boxes (respectively kk-dimensional unit cubes) and is denoted by box(G)box(G) (respectively cub(G)cub(G)). It was shown by Adiga and Chandran (Journal of Graph Theory, 65(4), 2010) that for any graph GG, cub(G)≀cub(G) \le box(G)⌈log⁑2Ξ±βŒ‰(G) \left \lceil \log_2 \alpha \right \rceil, where Ξ±=Ξ±(G)\alpha = \alpha(G) is the cardinality of the maximum independent set in GG. In this note we show that cub(G)≀2⌈log⁑2Ο‡(G)βŒ‰box(G)+Ο‡(G)⌈log⁑2Ξ±(G)βŒ‰cub(G) \le 2 \left \lceil \log_2 \chi(G) \right \rceil box(G) + \chi(G) \left \lceil \log_2 \alpha(G) \right \rceil . In general, this result can provide a much better upper bound than that of Adiga and Chandran for graph classes with bounded chromatic number. For example, for bipartite graphs we get, cub(G)≀2(box(G)+⌈log⁑2Ξ±(G)βŒ‰)cub(G) \le 2 (box(G) + \left \lceil \log_2 \alpha(G) \right \rceil ). Moreover we show that for every positive integer kk, there exist graphs with chromatic number kk, such that for every Ο΅>0\epsilon > 0, the value given by our upper bound is at most (1+Ο΅)(1+\epsilon) times their cubicity. Thus, our upper bound is almost tight

    A sufficient condition for a graph with boxicity at most its chromatic number

    Full text link
    A box in Euclidean kk-space is the Cartesian product of kk closed intervals on the real line. The boxicity of a graph GG, denoted by box(G)\text{box}(G), is the minimum nonnegative integer kk such that GG can be isomorphic to the intersection graph of a family of boxes in Euclidean kk-space. In this paper, we present a sufficient condition for a graph GG under which box(G)≀χ(G)\text{box}(G)\leq \chi (G) holds, where Ο‡(G)\chi (G) denotes the chromatic number of GG. Bhowmick and Chandran (2010) proved that box(G)≀χ(G)\text{box}(G)\leq \chi (G) holds for a graph GG with no asteroidal triples. We prove that box(G)≀χ(G)\text{box}(G)\leq \chi (G) holds for a graph GG in a special family of circulant graphs with an asteroidal triple.Comment: 10 pages, 4 figure

    On the stab number of rectangle intersection graphs

    Full text link
    We introduce the notion of \emph{stab number} and \emph{exact stab number} of rectangle intersection graphs, otherwise known as graphs of boxicity at most 2. A graph GG is said to be a \emph{kk-stabbable rectangle intersection graph}, or \emph{kk-SRIG} for short, if it has a rectangle intersection representation in which kk horizontal lines can be chosen such that each rectangle is intersected by at least one of them. If there exists such a representation with the additional property that each rectangle intersects exactly one of the kk horizontal lines, then the graph GG is said to be a \emph{kk-exactly stabbable rectangle intersection graph}, or \emph{kk-ESRIG} for short. The stab number of a graph GG, denoted by stab(G)stab(G), is the minimum integer kk such that GG is a kk-SRIG. Similarly, the exact stab number of a graph GG, denoted by estab(G)estab(G), is the minimum integer kk such that GG is a kk-ESRIG. In this work, we study the stab number and exact stab number of some subclasses of rectangle intersection graphs. A lower bound on the stab number of rectangle intersection graphs in terms of its pathwidth and clique number is shown. Tight upper bounds on the exact stab number of split graphs with boxicity at most 2 and block graphs are also given. We show that for k≀3k\leq 3, kk-SRIG is equivalent to kk-ESRIG and for any kβ‰₯10k\geq 10, there is a tree which is a kk-SRIG but not a kk-ESRIG. We also develop a forbidden structure characterization for block graphs that are 2-ESRIG and trees that are 3-ESRIG, which lead to polynomial-time recognition algorithms for these two classes of graphs. These forbidden structures are natural generalizations of asteroidal triples. Finally, we construct examples to show that these forbidden structures are not sufficient to characterize block graphs that are 3-SRIG or trees that are kk-SRIG for any kβ‰₯4k\geq 4
    corecore