706 research outputs found
Methods for protein complex prediction and their contributions towards understanding the organization, function and dynamics of complexes
Complexes of physically interacting proteins constitute fundamental
functional units responsible for driving biological processes within cells. A
faithful reconstruction of the entire set of complexes is therefore essential
to understand the functional organization of cells. In this review, we discuss
the key contributions of computational methods developed till date
(approximately between 2003 and 2015) for identifying complexes from the
network of interacting proteins (PPI network). We evaluate in depth the
performance of these methods on PPI datasets from yeast, and highlight
challenges faced by these methods, in particular detection of sparse and small
or sub- complexes and discerning of overlapping complexes. We describe methods
for integrating diverse information including expression profiles and 3D
structures of proteins with PPI networks to understand the dynamics of complex
formation, for instance, of time-based assembly of complex subunits and
formation of fuzzy complexes from intrinsically disordered proteins. Finally,
we discuss methods for identifying dysfunctional complexes in human diseases,
an application that is proving invaluable to understand disease mechanisms and
to discover novel therapeutic targets. We hope this review aptly commemorates a
decade of research on computational prediction of complexes and constitutes a
valuable reference for further advancements in this exciting area.Comment: 1 Tabl
Protein complex detection with semi-supervised learning in protein interaction networks
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play fundamental roles in nearly all biological processes. The systematic analysis of PPI networks can enable a great understanding of cellular organization, processes and function. In this paper, we investigate the problem of protein complex detection from noisy protein interaction data, i.e., finding the subsets of proteins that are closely coupled via protein interactions. However, protein complexes are likely to overlap and the interaction data are very noisy. It is a great challenge to effectively analyze the massive data for biologically meaningful protein complex detection.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Many people try to solve the problem by using the traditional unsupervised graph clustering methods. Here, we stand from a different point of view, redefining the properties and features for protein complexes and designing a “semi-supervised” method to analyze the problem. In this paper, we utilize the neural network with the “semi-supervised” mechanism to detect the protein complexes. By retraining the neural network model recursively, we could find the optimized parameters for the model, in such a way we can successfully detect the protein complexes. The comparison results show that our algorithm could identify protein complexes that are missed by other methods. We also have shown that our method achieve better precision and recall rates for the identified protein complexes than other existing methods. In addition, the framework we proposed is easy to be extended in the future.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Using a weighted network to represent the protein interaction network is more appropriate than using a traditional unweighted network. In addition, integrating biological features and topological features to represent protein complexes is more meaningful than using dense subgraphs. Last, the “semi-supervised” learning model is a promising model to detect protein complexes with more biological and topological features available.</p
Supervised maximum-likelihood weighting of composite protein networks for complex prediction
10.1186/1752-0509-6-S2-S13BMC Systems Biology6SUPPL.2
Which clustering algorithm is better for predicting protein complexes?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Protein-Protein interactions (PPI) play a key role in determining the outcome of most cellular processes. The correct identification and characterization of protein interactions and the networks, which they comprise, is critical for understanding the molecular mechanisms within the cell. Large-scale techniques such as pull down assays and tandem affinity purification are used in order to detect protein interactions in an organism. Today, relatively new high-throughput methods like yeast two hybrid, mass spectrometry, microarrays, and phage display are also used to reveal protein interaction networks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this paper we evaluated four different clustering algorithms using six different interaction datasets. We parameterized the MCL, Spectral, RNSC and Affinity Propagation algorithms and applied them to six PPI datasets produced experimentally by Yeast 2 Hybrid (Y2H) and Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) methods. The predicted clusters, so called protein complexes, were then compared and benchmarked with already known complexes stored in published databases.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>While results may differ upon parameterization, the MCL and RNSC algorithms seem to be more promising and more accurate at predicting PPI complexes. Moreover, they predict more complexes than other reviewed algorithms in absolute numbers. On the other hand the spectral clustering algorithm achieves the highest valid prediction rate in our experiments. However, it is nearly always outperformed by both RNSC and MCL in terms of the geometrical accuracy while it generates the fewest valid clusters than any other reviewed algorithm. This article demonstrates various metrics to evaluate the accuracy of such predictions as they are presented in the text below. Supplementary material can be found at: <url>http://www.bioacademy.gr/bioinformatics/projects/ppireview.htm</url></p
- …