1,203 research outputs found

    Video Question Answering on Screencast Tutorials

    Full text link
    This paper presents a new video question answering task on screencast tutorials. We introduce a dataset including question, answer and context triples from the tutorial videos for a software. Unlike other video question answering works, all the answers in our dataset are grounded to the domain knowledge base. An one-shot recognition algorithm is designed to extract the visual cues, which helps enhance the performance of video question answering. We also propose several baseline neural network architectures based on various aspects of video contexts from the dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed models significantly improve the question answering performances by incorporating multi-modal contexts and domain knowledge

    MSG-BART: Multi-granularity Scene Graph-Enhanced Encoder-Decoder Language Model for Video-grounded Dialogue Generation

    Full text link
    Generating dialogue grounded in videos requires a high level of understanding and reasoning about the visual scenes in the videos. However, existing large visual-language models are not effective due to their latent features and decoder-only structure, especially with respect to spatio-temporal relationship reasoning. In this paper, we propose a novel approach named MSG-BART, which enhances the integration of video information by incorporating a multi-granularity spatio-temporal scene graph into an encoder-decoder pre-trained language model. Specifically, we integrate the global and local scene graph into the encoder and decoder, respectively, to improve both overall perception and target reasoning capability. To further improve the information selection capability, we propose a multi-pointer network to facilitate selection between text and video. Extensive experiments are conducted on three video-grounded dialogue benchmarks, which show the significant superiority of the proposed MSG-BART compared to a range of state-of-the-art approaches.Comment: 5 pages,3 figure

    Unified-IO 2: Scaling Autoregressive Multimodal Models with Vision, Language, Audio, and Action

    Full text link
    We present Unified-IO 2, the first autoregressive multimodal model that is capable of understanding and generating image, text, audio, and action. To unify different modalities, we tokenize inputs and outputs -- images, text, audio, action, bounding boxes, etc., into a shared semantic space and then process them with a single encoder-decoder transformer model. Since training with such diverse modalities is challenging, we propose various architectural improvements to stabilize model training. We train our model from scratch on a large multimodal pre-training corpus from diverse sources with a multimodal mixture of denoisers objective. To learn an expansive set of skills, such as following multimodal instructions, we construct and finetune on an ensemble of 120 datasets with prompts and augmentations. With a single unified model, Unified-IO 2 achieves state-of-the-art performance on the GRIT benchmark and strong results in more than 35 benchmarks, including image generation and understanding, natural language understanding, video and audio understanding, and robotic manipulation. We release all our models to the research community.Comment: 38 pages, 20 figure

    Perception Test:A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models

    Get PDF
    We propose a novel multimodal video benchmark - the Perception Test - to evaluate the perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained multimodal models (e.g. Flamingo, BEiT-3, or GPT-4). Compared to existing benchmarks that focus on computational tasks (e.g. classification, detection or tracking), the Perception Test focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and types of reasoning (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual) across video, audio, and text modalities, to provide a comprehensive and efficient evaluation tool. The benchmark probes pre-trained models for their transfer capabilities, in a zero-shot / few-shot or limited finetuning regime. For these purposes, the Perception Test introduces 11.6k real-world videos, 23s average length, designed to show perceptually interesting situations, filmed by around 100 participants worldwide. The videos are densely annotated with six types of labels (multiple-choice and grounded video question-answers, object and point tracks, temporal action and sound segments), enabling both language and non-language evaluations. The fine-tuning and validation splits of the benchmark are publicly available (CC-BY license), in addition to a challenge server with a held-out test split. Human baseline results compared to state-of-the-art video QA models show a significant gap in performance (91.4% vs 45.8%), suggesting that there is significant room for improvement in multimodal video understanding. Dataset, baselines code, and challenge server are available at https://github.com/deepmind/perception_tes

    μ΄μ•ΌκΈ°ν˜• μ„€λͺ…문을 ν™œμš©ν•œ λŒ€κ·œλͺ¨ λΉ„λ””μ˜€ ν•™μŠ΅ 연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : κ³΅κ³ΌλŒ€ν•™ 컴퓨터곡학뢀, 2021. 2. 김건희.Extensive contributions are being made to develop intelligent agents that can recognize and communicate with the world. In this sense, various video-language tasks have drawn a lot of interests in computer vision research, including image/video captioning, video retrieval and video question answering. It can be applied to high-level computer vision tasks and various future industries such as search engines, social marketing, automated driving, and robotics support through QA / dialog generation for the surrounding environment. However, despite these developments, video-language learning suffers from a higher degree of complexity. This thesis investigates methodologies for learning the relationship between videos and free-formed languages, including explanations, conversations, and question-and-answers, so that the machine can easily adapt to target downstream tasks. First, we introduce several methods to learn the relationship between long sentences and videos efficiently. We introduce the approaches for supervising human attention transfer for the video attention model, which shows the video attention mechanism can benefit from explicit human gaze labels. Next, we introduce the end-to-end semantic attention method, which further reduces the visual attention algorithm's complexity by using the representative visual concept word detected by the attention-based detector. As a follow-up study on previous methods, we introduce a JSFusion (Joint Sequence Fusion) method that enables efficient video search and QA by enabling many-to-many matching of attention model. Next, we introduce the CiSIN(Character in Story Identification Network), which uses Attention to increase the performance of character grounding and character re-identification in the movie. Finally, we introduce Transitional Adaptation, which promotes the caption generation models to generates coherent narratives for long videos. In summary, this thesis presents a novel approaches for automatic video description generation/retrieval and shows the benefits of extracting linguistic knowledge for object and motion in the video as well as the advantage of multimodal audio-visual learning for understanding videos. Since the proposed methods are easily adapted to any video-language tasks, it is expected to be applied to the latest models, bringing additional performance improvements. Moving forward, we plan to design an unsupervised video learning framework that can solve many challenges in the industry by integrating an unlimited amount of video, audio, and free-formed language data from the web.μ‹œκ°-μ–Έμ–΄ ν•™μŠ΅μ€ 이미지/λΉ„λ””μ˜€ μΊ‘μ…˜(Image/Video captioning), μ‹œκ° μ§ˆμ˜μ‘λ‹΅(Visual Question and Answering), λΉ„λ””μ˜€ 검색(Video Retrieval), μž₯λ©΄ 이해(scene understanding), 이벀트 인식(event detection) λ“± κ³ μ°¨μ›μ˜ 컴퓨터 λΉ„μ „ νƒœμŠ€ν¬(task)뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ£Όλ³€ ν™˜κ²½μ— λŒ€ν•œ 질의 응닡 및 λŒ€ν™” 생성(Dialogue Generation)으둜 인터넷 검색 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 졜근 ν™œλ°œν•œ μ†Œμ…œ λ§ˆμΌ€νŒ…(Social Marketing) 자율 μ£Όν–‰(Automated Driving), λ‘œλ³΄ν‹±μŠ€(Robotics)을 λ³΄μ‘°ν•˜λŠ” λ“± μ—¬λŸ¬ 미래 산업에 적용될 수 μžˆμ–΄ ν™œλ°œνžˆ μ—°κ΅¬λ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ€‘μš”ν•œ 뢄야이닀. 컴퓨터 λΉ„μ Όκ³Ό μžμ—°μ–΄ μ²˜λ¦¬λŠ” μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ€‘μš”μ„±μ„ λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ 각자 κ³ μœ ν•œ μ˜μ—­μ—μ„œ λ°œμ „μ„ κ±°λ“­ν•΄ μ™”μœΌλ‚˜, 졜근 λ”₯λŸ¬λ‹μ˜ λ“±μž₯κ³Ό ν•¨κ»˜ λˆˆλΆ€μ‹œκ²Œ λ°œμ „ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ μ„œλ‘œλ₯Ό λ³΄μ™„ν•˜λ©° ν•™μŠ΅ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν–₯μƒμ‹œν‚€λŠ” λ“± 큰 μ‹œλ„ˆμ§€ 효과λ₯Ό λ°œνœ˜ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ 이런 λ°œμ „μ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³ , λΉ„λ””μ˜€-μ–Έμ–΄κ°„ ν•™μŠ΅μ€ 문제의 λ³΅μž‘λ„κ°€ ν•œμΈ΅ λ†’μ•„ 어렀움을 κ²ͺ게 λ˜λŠ” κ²½μš°κ°€ λ§Žλ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” λΉ„λ””μ˜€μ™€ 이에 λŒ€μ‘ν•˜λŠ” μ„€λͺ…, λŒ€ν™”, 질의 응닡 λ“± 더 λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ 자유 ν˜•νƒœμ˜ μ–Έμ–΄ (Free-formed language)κ°„μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό λ”μš± 효율적으둜 ν•™μŠ΅ν•˜κ³ , λͺ©ν‘œ μž„λ¬΄μ— 잘 λŒ€μ‘ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ κ°œμ„ ν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©ν‘œλ‘œ ν•œλ‹€. λ¨Όμ €, μ‹œκ°μ  λ³΅μž‘λ„κ°€ 이미지보닀 높은 λΉ„λ””μ˜€μ™€ κΈ΄ λ¬Έμž₯ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό 효율적으둜 ν•™μŠ΅ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μ—¬λŸ¬ 방법듀을 μ†Œκ°œν•œλ‹€. μΈκ°„μ˜ 주의 인식(Attention) λͺ¨λΈμ„ λΉ„λ””μ˜€-μ–Έμ–΄ λͺ¨λΈμ— 지도 ν•™μŠ΅ ν•˜λŠ” 방법을 μ†Œκ°œν•˜κ³ , μ΄μ–΄μ„œ λΉ„λ””μ˜€μ—μ„œ μš°μ„  κ²€μΆœλœ λŒ€ν‘œ μ‹œκ° 단어λ₯Ό 맀개둜 ν•˜μ—¬ 주의 인식(Attention) μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜μ˜ λ³΅μž‘λ„λ₯Ό λ”μš± μ€„μ΄λŠ” 의미 쀑심 주의 인식 (Semantic Attention) 방법, μ–΄ν…μ…˜ λͺ¨λΈμ˜ λ‹€λŒ€λ‹€ 맀칭을 기반으둜 효율적인 λΉ„λ””μ˜€ 검색 및 μ§ˆμ˜μ‘λ‹΅μ„ κ°€λŠ₯μΌ€ ν•˜λŠ” λΉ„λ””μ˜€-μ–Έμ–΄κ°„ μœ΅ν•© (Joint Sequence Fusion) 방법 λ“± λΉ„λ””μ˜€ 주의 인식을 효율적으둜 ν•™μŠ΅μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” 방법듀을 μ œμ‹œν•œλ‹€. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œλŠ”, 주의 인식(Attention) λͺ¨λΈμ΄ 물체-단어 κ°„ 관계λ₯Ό λ„˜μ–΄ λΉ„λ””μ˜€ μƒμ—μ„œ 인물 검색 (Person Searching) 그리고 인물 재 식별 (Person Re-Identification)을 λ™μ‹œμ— μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜λ©° μƒμŠΉμž‘μš©μ„ μΌμœΌν‚€λŠ” μŠ€ν† λ¦¬ 속 캐릭터 인식 신경망 (Character in Story Identification Network) 을 μ†Œκ°œν•˜λ©°, λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ 자기 지도 ν•™μŠ΅(Self-supervised Learning)을 톡해 주의 인식(Attention) 기반 μ–Έμ–΄ λͺ¨λΈμ΄ κΈ΄ λΉ„λ””μ˜€μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„€λͺ…을 μ—°κ΄€μ„± 있게 잘 생성할 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μœ λ„ν•˜λŠ” 방법을 μ†Œκ°œν•œλ‹€. μš”μ•½ν•˜μžλ©΄, 이 ν•™μœ„ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œ μ œμ•ˆν•œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 방법둠듀은 λΉ„λ””μ˜€-μ–Έμ–΄ ν•™μŠ΅μ— ν•΄λ‹Ήν•˜λŠ” λΉ„λ””μ˜€ μΊ‘μ…˜(Video captioning), λΉ„λ””μ˜€ 검색(Video Retrieval), μ‹œκ° μ§ˆμ˜μ‘λ‹΅(Video Question and Answering)등을 ν•΄κ²°ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 기술적 λ””λ”€λŒμ΄ 되며, λΉ„λ””μ˜€ μΊ‘μ…˜ ν•™μŠ΅μ„ 톡해 ν•™μŠ΅λœ 주의 인식 λͺ¨λ“ˆμ€ 검색 및 μ§ˆμ˜μ‘λ‹΅, 인물 검색 λ“± 각 λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬μ— μ΄μ‹λ˜λ©΄μ„œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ λ¬Έμ œλ“€μ— λŒ€ν•΄ λ™μ‹œμ— 졜고 μˆ˜μ€€(State-of-the-art)의 μ„±λŠ₯을 λ‹¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό 톡해 λΉ„λ””μ˜€-μ–Έμ–΄ ν•™μŠ΅μœΌλ‘œ 얻은 μ–Έμ–΄ μ§€μ‹μ˜ 이전은 μ‹œκ°-청각을 μ•„μš°λ₯΄λŠ” λΉ„λ””μ˜€ λ©€ν‹°λͺ¨λ‹¬ ν•™μŠ΅μ— 큰 도움이 λ˜λŠ” 것을 μ‹€ν—˜μ μœΌλ‘œ 보여쀀닀. ν–₯ν›„ μž‘μ—… λ°©ν–₯ (Future Work)μœΌλ‘œλŠ” μ•žμ„œ μ—°κ΅¬ν•œ λ‚΄μš©λ“€μ„ 기반으둜 μ›Ή 속에 μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜λŠ” λŒ€κ·œλͺ¨μ˜ μ–Έμ–΄, λΉ„λ””μ˜€, μ˜€λ””μ˜€ 데이터λ₯Ό 톡합해 ν•™μŠ΅μ— ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚°μ—…κ³„μ˜ λ§Žμ€ λ‚œμ œλ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 비지도 ν•™μŠ΅ λͺ¨λΈμ„ λ§Œλ“€κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€.Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.2 Outline of the thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Chapter 2 Related Work 2.1 Video Captioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2.2 Video Retrieval with Natural Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3 Video Question and Answering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 Cross-modal Representation Learning for Vision and LanguageTasks . . . . 15 Chapter 3 Human Attention Transfer for Video Captioning18 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Video Datasets for Caption and Gaze . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.3.1 Video Pre-processing and Description . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.3.2The Recurrent Gaze Prediction (RGP) Model . . . . . . . 23 3.3.3Construction of Visual Feature Pools . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.3.4The Decoder for Caption Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.3.5Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.4.1Evaluation of Gaze Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.4.2Evaluation of Video Captioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.4.3Human Evaluation via AMT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Chapter 4 Semantic Word Attention for Video QA and VideoCaptioning 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.1.1Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4.1.2Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 4.2 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2.1Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2.2An Attention Model for Concept Detection . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.3Video-to-Language Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2.4A Model for Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2.5A Model for Fill-in-the-Blank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 4.2.6A Model for Multiple-Choice Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.2.7A Model for Retrieval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.3 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3.1The LSMDC Dataset and Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3.2Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.3.3Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Chapter 5 Joint Sequnece Fusion Attention for Multimodal Sequence Data 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.3.1Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.3.2The Joint Semantic Tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 5.3.3The Convolutional Hierarchical Decoder . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.3.4An Illustrative Example of How the JSFusion Model Works 68 5.3.5Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 5.3.6Implementation of Video-Language Models . . . . . . . . 69 5.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.4.1LSMDC Dataset and Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.4.2MSR-VTT-(RET/MC) Dataset and Tasks . . . . . . . . . 73 5.4.3Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.4.4Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Chapter 6 Character Re-Identification and Character Ground-ing for Movie Understanding 6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 6.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 6.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 6.3.1Video Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.3.2Visual Track Embedding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 6.3.3Textual Character Embedding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 6.3.4Character Grounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 6.3.5Re-Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 6.3.6Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 6.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 6.4.1Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 6.4.2Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 6.4.3Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 6.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Chapter 7 Transitional Adaptation of Pretrained Models forVisual Storytelling 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 7.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 7.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 7.3.1The Visual Encoder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 7.3.2The Language Generator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 7.3.3Adaptation training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 7.3.4The Sequential Coherence Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 7.3.5Training with the adaptation Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 7.3.6Fine-tuning and Inference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 7.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 7.4.1Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 7.4.2Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 7.4.3Further Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 7.4.4Human Evaluation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 7.4.5Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 7.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Chapter 8 Conclusion 8.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 8.2 Future Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Bibliography ... 123 μš”μ•½ ... 148 Acknowledgements ... 150Docto

    A Survey of Natural Language Generation

    Full text link
    This paper offers a comprehensive review of the research on Natural Language Generation (NLG) over the past two decades, especially in relation to data-to-text generation and text-to-text generation deep learning methods, as well as new applications of NLG technology. This survey aims to (a) give the latest synthesis of deep learning research on the NLG core tasks, as well as the architectures adopted in the field; (b) detail meticulously and comprehensively various NLG tasks and datasets, and draw attention to the challenges in NLG evaluation, focusing on different evaluation methods and their relationships; (c) highlight some future emphasis and relatively recent research issues that arise due to the increasing synergy between NLG and other artificial intelligence areas, such as computer vision, text and computational creativity.Comment: Accepted by ACM Computing Survey (CSUR) 202

    Advancing Visual Grounding with Scene Knowledge: Benchmark and Method

    Full text link
    Visual grounding (VG) aims to establish fine-grained alignment between vision and language. Ideally, it can be a testbed for vision-and-language models to evaluate their understanding of the images and texts and their reasoning abilities over their joint space. However, most existing VG datasets are constructed using simple description texts, which do not require sufficient reasoning over the images and texts. This has been demonstrated in a recent study~\cite{luo2022goes}, where a simple LSTM-based text encoder without pretraining can achieve state-of-the-art performance on mainstream VG datasets. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a novel benchmark of \underline{S}cene \underline{K}nowledge-guided \underline{V}isual \underline{G}rounding (SK-VG), where the image content and referring expressions are not sufficient to ground the target objects, forcing the models to have a reasoning ability on the long-form scene knowledge. To perform this task, we propose two approaches to accept the triple-type input, where the former embeds knowledge into the image features before the image-query interaction; the latter leverages linguistic structure to assist in computing the image-text matching. We conduct extensive experiments to analyze the above methods and show that the proposed approaches achieve promising results but still leave room for improvement, including performance and interpretability. The dataset and code are available at \url{https://github.com/zhjohnchan/SK-VG}.Comment: Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing. 21 pages, 14 figures. CVPR-202
    • …
    corecore