760 research outputs found

    Two Optimal One-Error-Correcting Codes of Length 13 That Are Not Doubly Shortened Perfect Codes

    Full text link
    The doubly shortened perfect codes of length 13 are classified utilizing the classification of perfect codes in [P.R.J. \"Osterg{\aa}rd and O. Pottonen, The perfect binary one-error-correcting codes of length 15: Part I - Classification, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, to appear]; there are 117821 such (13,512,3) codes. By applying a switching operation to those codes, two more (13,512,3) codes are obtained, which are then not doubly shortened perfect codes.Comment: v2: a correction concerning shortened codes of length 1

    On Optimal Binary One-Error-Correcting Codes of Lengths 2mโˆ’42^m-4 and 2mโˆ’32^m-3

    Full text link
    Best and Brouwer [Discrete Math. 17 (1977), 235-245] proved that triply-shortened and doubly-shortened binary Hamming codes (which have length 2mโˆ’42^m-4 and 2mโˆ’32^m-3, respectively) are optimal. Properties of such codes are here studied, determining among other things parameters of certain subcodes. A utilization of these properties makes a computer-aided classification of the optimal binary one-error-correcting codes of lengths 12 and 13 possible; there are 237610 and 117823 such codes, respectively (with 27375 and 17513 inequivalent extensions). This completes the classification of optimal binary one-error-correcting codes for all lengths up to 15. Some properties of the classified codes are further investigated. Finally, it is proved that for any mโ‰ฅ4m \geq 4, there are optimal binary one-error-correcting codes of length 2mโˆ’42^m-4 and 2mโˆ’32^m-3 that cannot be lengthened to perfect codes of length 2mโˆ’12^m-1.Comment: Accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. Data available at http://www.iki.fi/opottone/code

    On the binary codes with parameters of triply-shortened 1-perfect codes

    Full text link
    We study properties of binary codes with parameters close to the parameters of 1-perfect codes. An arbitrary binary (n=2mโˆ’3,2nโˆ’mโˆ’1,4)(n=2^m-3, 2^{n-m-1}, 4) code CC, i.e., a code with parameters of a triply-shortened extended Hamming code, is a cell of an equitable partition of the nn-cube into six cells. An arbitrary binary (n=2mโˆ’4,2nโˆ’m,3)(n=2^m-4, 2^{n-m}, 3) code DD, i.e., a code with parameters of a triply-shortened Hamming code, is a cell of an equitable family (but not a partition) from six cells. As a corollary, the codes CC and DD are completely semiregular; i.e., the weight distribution of such a code depends only on the minimal and maximal codeword weights and the code parameters. Moreover, if DD is self-complementary, then it is completely regular. As an intermediate result, we prove, in terms of distance distributions, a general criterion for a partition of the vertices of a graph (from rather general class of graphs, including the distance-regular graphs) to be equitable. Keywords: 1-perfect code; triply-shortened 1-perfect code; equitable partition; perfect coloring; weight distribution; distance distributionComment: 12 page

    On qq-ary shortened-11-perfect-like codes

    Full text link
    We study codes with parameters of qq-ary shortened Hamming codes, i.e., (n=(qmโˆ’q)/(qโˆ’1),qnโˆ’m,3)q(n=(q^m-q)/(q-1), q^{n-m}, 3)_q. At first, we prove the fact mentioned in [A.E.Brouwer et al. Bounds on mixed binary/ternary codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44 (1998) 140-161] that such codes are optimal, generalizing it to a bound for multifold packings of radius-11 balls, with a corollary for multiple coverings. In particular, we show that the punctured Hamming code is an optimal qq-fold packing with minimum distance 22. At second, we show the existence of 44-ary codes with parameters of shortened 11-perfect codes that cannot be obtained by shortening a 11-perfect code. Keywords: Hamming graph; multifold packings; multiple coverings; perfect codes

    ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์†Œ์‹ค ์ฑ„๋„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ž๊ธฐ๋™ํ˜• ๊ตฐ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์ ‘์† ๋ณต๊ตฌ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๋œ ๊ทผ ํ”„๋กœํ† ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ๋…ธ์ข…์„ .In this dissertation, three main contributions are given asi) new two-stage automorphism group decoders (AGD) for cyclic codes in the erasure channel, ii) new constructions of binary and ternary locally repairable codes (LRCs) using cyclic codes and existing LRCs, and iii) new constructions of high-rate generalized root protograph (GRP) low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes for a nonergodic block interference and partially regular (PR) LDPC codes for follower noise jamming (FNJ), are considered. First, I propose a new two-stage AGD (TS-AGD) for cyclic codes in the erasure channel. Recently, error correcting codes in the erasure channel have drawn great attention for various applications such as distributed storage systems and wireless sensor networks, but many of their decoding algorithms are not practical because they have higher decoding complexity and longer delay. Thus, the AGD for cyclic codes in the erasure channel was introduced, which has good erasure decoding performance with low decoding complexity. In this research, I propose new TS-AGDs for cyclic codes in the erasure channel by modifying the parity check matrix and introducing the preprocessing stage to the AGD scheme. The proposed TS-AGD is analyzed for the perfect codes, BCH codes, and maximum distance separable (MDS) codes. Through numerical analysis, it is shown that the proposed decoding algorithm has good erasure decoding performance with lower decoding complexity than the conventional AGD. For some cyclic codes, it is shown that the proposed TS-AGD achieves the perfect decoding in the erasure channel, that is, the same decoding performance as the maximum likelihood (ML) decoder. For MDS codes, TS-AGDs with the expanded parity check matrix and the submatrix inversion are also proposed and analyzed. Second, I propose new constructions of binary and ternary LRCs using cyclic codes and existing two LRCs for distributed storage system. For a primitive work, new constructions of binary and ternary LRCs using cyclic codes and their concatenation are proposed. Some of proposed binary LRCs with Hamming weights 4, 5, and 6 are optimal in terms of the upper bounds. In addition, the similar method of the binary case is applied to construct the ternary LRCs with good parameters. Also, new constructions of binary LRCs with large Hamming distance and disjoint repair groups are proposed. The proposed binary linear LRCs constructed by using existing binary LRCs are optimal or near-optimal in terms of the bound with disjoint repair group. Last, I propose new constructions of high-rate GRP LDPC codes for a nonergodic block interference and anti-jamming PR LDPC codes for follower jamming. The proposed high-rate GRP LDPC codes are based on nonergodic two-state binary symmetric channel with block interference and Nakagami-mm block fading. In these channel environments, GRP LDPC codes have good performance approaching to the theoretical limit in the channel with one block interference, where their performance is shown by the channel threshold or the channel outage probability. In the proposed design, I find base matrices using the protograph extrinsic information transfer (PEXIT) algorithm. Also, the proposed new constructions of anti-jamming partially regular LDPC codes is based on follower jamming on the frequency-hopped spread spectrum (FHSS). For a channel environment, I suppose follower jamming with random dwell time and Rayleigh block fading environment with M-ary frequnecy shift keying (MFSK) modulation. For a coding perspective, an anti-jamming LDPC codes against follower jamming are introduced. In order to optimize the jamming environment, the partially regular structure and corresponding density evolution schemes are used. A series of simulations show that the proposed codes outperforms the 802.16e standard in the presence of follower noise jamming.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š”, i) ์†Œ์‹ค ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ด๋‹จ ์ž๊ธฐ๋™ํ˜• ๊ตฐ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ , ii) ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์ €์žฅ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์ ‘์† ๋ณต๊ตฌ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ(LRC)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ด์ง„ ํ˜น์€ ์‚ผ์ง„ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์ ‘์† ๋ณต๊ตฌ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฒ•, ๋ฐ iii) ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ฐ„์„ญ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ถ€ํšจ์œจ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๋œ ๊ทผ ํ”„๋กœํ† ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(generalized root protograph, GRP) LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ์ถ”์  ์žฌ๋ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•ญ์žฌ๋ฐ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ท ์ผ (anti-jamming paritally regular, AJ-PR) LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์†Œ์‹ค ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ด๋‹จ ์ž๊ธฐ๋™ํ˜• ๊ตฐ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์ €์žฅ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํ˜น์€ ๋ฌด์„  ์„ผ์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์†Œ์‹ค ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ์ •์ • ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์ฃผ๋ชฉ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๋†’์€ ๋ณตํ˜ธ ๋ณต์žก๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ธด ์ง€์—ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ด์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ณตํ˜ธ ๋ณต์žก๋„ ๋ฐ ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ์—์„œ ์ด๋‹จ ์ž๊ธฐ ๋™ํ˜• ๊ตฐ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒจ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ๋ณ€ํ˜•ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ด๋‹จ ์ž๊ธฐ๋™ํ˜• ๊ตฐ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ๋Š” perfect ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ, BCH ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ (maximum distance separable, MDS) ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ณตํ˜ธ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ž๊ธฐ ๋™ํ˜• ๊ตฐ ๋ณตํ˜ธ๊ธฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ณต์žก๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋ช‡๋ช‡์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ์†Œ์‹ค ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์šฐ๋„ (maximal likelihood, ML)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ž„์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. MDS ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ํŒจ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํ–‰๋ ฌ ๋ฐ ์ž‘์€ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์˜ ์—ญ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์ €์žฅ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์ ‘์† ๋ณต๊ตฌ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ (LRC)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ด์ง„ ํ˜น์€ ์‚ผ์ง„ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์ ‘์† ๋ณต๊ตฌ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ์„œ, ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ์ ‘์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ด์ง„ ๋ฐ ์‚ผ์ง„ LRC ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œ ํ•ด๋ฐ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ 4,5, ํ˜น์€ 6์ธ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ด์ง„ LRC ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ์ƒํ•œ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด ๋ณด์•˜์„ ๋•Œ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„์ž„์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ข‹์€ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ์‚ผ์ง„ LRC๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์™ธ์— ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ LRC๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํฐ ํ•ด๋ฐ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด LRC๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ LRC๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ๋ณต๊ตฌ ๊ตฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ตœ์ ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, GRP LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ๋Š” Nakagami-mm ๋ธ”๋ก ํŽ˜์ด๋”ฉ ๋ฐ ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ฐ„์„ญ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‘ ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ์ด์ง„ ๋Œ€์นญ ์ฑ„๋„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ GRP LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ๋Š” ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ฐ„์„ญ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ด๋ก ์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ์ข‹์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ด๋ก  ๊ฐ’์€ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ฌธํ„ฑ๊ฐ’์ด๋‚˜ ์ฑ„๋„ outage ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š”, ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋œ PEXIT ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ AJ-PR LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๋„์•ฝ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”์  ์žฌ๋ฐ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฑ„๋„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ MFSK ๋ณ€๋ณต์กฐ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๋ ˆ์ผ๋ฆฌ ๋ธ”๋ก ํŽ˜์ด๋”ฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ํ•œ ์ง€์† ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ท ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ํ•ด๋‹น๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ€๋„ ์ง„ํ™” (density evolution, DE) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ถ”์  ์žฌ๋ฐ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ 802.16e์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ LDPC ๋ถ€ํ˜ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.Contents Abstract Contents List of Tables List of Figures 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Overview of Dissertation 1.3 Notations 2 Preliminaries 2.1 IED and AGD for Erasure Channel 2.1.1 Iterative Erasure Decoder 2.1.1 Automorphism Group Decoder 2.2. Binary Locally Repairable Codes for Distributed Storage System 2.2.1 Bounds and Optimalities of Binary LRCs 2.2.2 Existing Optimal Constructions of Binary LRCs 2.3 Channels with Block Interference and Jamming 2.3.1 Channels with Block Interference 2.3.2 Channels with Jamming with MFSK and FHSS Environment. 3 New Two-Stage Automorphism Group Decoders for Cyclic Codes in the Erasure Channel 3.1 Some Definitions 3.2 Modification of Parity Check Matrix and Two-Stage AGD 3.2.1 Modification of the Parity Check Matrix 3.2.2 A New Two-Stage AGD 3.2.3 Analysis of Modification Criteria for the Parity Check Matrix 3.2.4 Analysis of Decoding Complexity of TS-AGD 3.2.5 Numerical Analysis for Some Cyclic Codes 3.3 Construction of Parity Check Matrix and TS-AGD for Cyclic MDS Codes 3.3.1 Modification of Parity Check Matrix for Cyclic MDS Codes . 3.3.2 Proposed TS-AGD for Cyclic MDS Codes 3.3.3 Perfect Decoding by TS-AGD with Expanded Parity Check Matrix for Cyclic MDS Codes 3.3.4 TS-AGD with Submatrix Inversion for Cyclic MDS Codes . . 4 New Constructions of Binary and Ternary LRCs Using Cyclic Codes and Existing LRCs 4.1 Constructions of Binary LRCs Using Cyclic Codes 4.2 Constructions of Linear Ternary LRCs Using Cyclic Codes 4.3 Constructions of Binary LRCs with Disjoint Repair Groups Using Existing LRCs 4.4 New Constructions of Binary Linear LRCs with d โ‰ฅ 8 Using Existing LRCs 5 New Constructions of Generalized RP LDPC Codes for Block Interference and Partially Regular LDPC Codes for Follower Jamming 5.1 Generalized RP LDPC Codes for a Nonergodic BI 5.1.1 Minimum Blockwise Hamming Weight 5.1.2 Construction of GRP LDPC Codes 5.2 Asymptotic and Numerical Analyses of GRP LDPC Codes 5.2.1 Asymptotic Analysis of LDPC Codes 5.2.2 Numerical Analysis of Finite-Length LDPC Codes 5.3 Follower Noise Jamming with Fixed Scan Speed 5.4 Anti-Jamming Partially Regular LDPC Codes for Follower Noise Jamming 5.4.1 Simplified Channel Model and Corresponding Density Evolution 5.4.2 Construction of AJ-PR-LDPC Codes Based on DE 5.5 Numerical Analysis of AJ-PR LDPC Codes 6 Conclusion Abstract (In Korean)Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore