Twitter Activity Timeline as a Signature of Urban Neighborhood

Modern cities are complex systems, evolving at a fast pace. Thus, many urban planning, political, and economic decisions require a deep and up-to-date understanding of the local context of urban neighborhoods. This study shows that the structure of openly available social media records, such as Twitter, offers a possibility for building a unique dynamic signature of urban neighborhood function, and, therefore, might be used as an efficient and simple decision support tool. Considering New York City as an example, we investigate how Twitter data can be used to decompose the urban landscape into self-defining zones, aligned with the functional properties of individual neighborhoods and their social and economic characteristics. We further explore the potential of these data for detecting events and evaluating their impact over time and space. This approach paves a way to a methodology for immediate quantification of the impact of urban development programs and the estimation of socioeconomic statistics at a finer spatial-temporal scale, thus allowing urban policy-makers to track neighborhood transformations and foresee undesirable changes in order to take early action before official statistics would be available

Digital Urban Sensing: A Multi-layered Approach

Studies of human mobility increasingly rely on digital sensing, the large-scale recording of human activity facilitated by digital technologies. Questions of variability and population representativity, however, in patterns seen from these sources, remain major challenges for interpreting any outcomes gleaned from these records. The present research explores these questions by providing a comparison of the spatial and temporal activity distributions seen from taxi, subway and Citi Bike trips, mobile app records, geo-tagged Twitter data as well as 311 service requests in the five boroughs of New York City. The comparison reveals substantially different spatial and temporal patterns amongst these datasets, emphasizing limitations in the capacity of individual datasets to represent urban dynamics in their entirety. We further provide interpretations on these differences by decomposing the spatial distributions with working-residential balance and different propensities for demographic groups to use different activities. Nevertheless, the differences also highlight the opportunity to leverage the plurality to create multi-layered models of urban dynamics. We demonstrate the capacity of such models to advance urban zoning and socio-economic modeling - two common applications of digital urban sensing.Comment: 17 pages, 12 figure