Transfer-Learning Oriented Class Imbalance Learning for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) aims to predict defects of projects lacking training data by using prediction models trained on historical defect data from other projects. However, since the distribution differences between datasets from different projects, it is still a challenge to build high-quality CPDP models. Unfortunately, class imbalanced nature of software defect datasets further increases the difficulty. In this paper, we propose a transferlearning oriented minority over-sampling technique (TOMO) based feature weighting transfer naive Bayes (FWTNB) approach (TOMOFWTNB) for CPDP by considering both classimbalance and feature importance problems. Differing from traditional over-sampling techniques, TOMO not only can balance the data but reduce the distribution difference. And then FWTNB is used to further increase the similarity of two distributions. Experiments are performed on 11 public defect datasets. The experimental results show that (1) TOMO improves the average G-Measure by 23.7\%$\sim$41.8\%, and the average MCC by 54.2\%$\sim$77.8\%. (2) feature weighting (FW) strategy improves the average G-Measure by 11\%, and the average MCC by 29.2\%. (3) TOMOFWTNB improves the average G-Measure value by at least 27.8\%, and the average MCC value by at least 71.5\%, compared with existing state-of-theart CPDP approaches. It can be concluded that (1) TOMO is very effective for addressing class-imbalance problem in CPDP scenario; (2) our FW strategy is helpful for CPDP; (3) TOMOFWTNB outperforms previous state-of-the-art CPDP approaches

Understanding the Automated Parameter Optimization on Transfer Learning for CPDP: An Empirical Study

Data-driven defect prediction has become increasingly important in software engineering process. Since it is not uncommon that data from a software project is insufficient for training a reliable defect prediction model, transfer learning that borrows data/knowledge from other projects to facilitate the model building at the current project, namely cross-project defect prediction (CPDP), is naturally plausible. Most CPDP techniques involve two major steps, i.e., transfer learning and classification, each of which has at least one parameter to be tuned to achieve their optimal performance. This practice fits well with the purpose of automated parameter optimization. However, there is a lack of thorough understanding about what are the impacts of automated parameter optimization on various CPDP techniques. In this paper, we present the first empirical study that looks into such impacts on 62 CPDP techniques, 13 of which are chosen from the existing CPDP literature while the other 49 ones have not been explored before. We build defect prediction models over 20 real-world software projects that are of different scales and characteristics. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) Automated parameter optimization substantially improves the defect prediction performance of 77\% CPDP techniques with a manageable computational cost. Thus more efforts on this aspect are required in future CPDP studies. (2) Transfer learning is of ultimate importance in CPDP. Given a tight computational budget, it is more cost-effective to focus on optimizing the parameter configuration of transfer learning algorithms (3) The research on CPDP is far from mature where it is "not difficult" to find a better alternative by making a combination of existing transfer learning and classification techniques. This finding provides important insights about the future design of CPDP techniques