1,032 research outputs found

    ํƒ€์ด์–ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ž์œจ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ œ์–ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์ด๋™์ค€.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” Wheeled Mobile Robot(WMR)์˜์ž์œจ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๋””์ž์ธ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์ƒ์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ธ CarSim์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ, WMR์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน์Šค์™€ ํƒ€์ด์–ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ •์˜ ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ œ์•ฝ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ œ์–ด ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์ •์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. (์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์š” ๊ฐ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•œ๋‹ค.) ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ณ -๋ ˆ๋ฒจ ์ œ์–ด, ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ณ -๊ฒŒ์ธ ์ œ์–ด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์–ดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ CarSim ์‹œ๋ฎฌ ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€, ํ—ค์–ดํ•€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œ ํ•œ๋‹ค.Control design and analysis of Wheeled Mobile Robot(WMR) autonomous drift-driving and the simulation experiment using the CarSim simulator are presented and the analysis of the controller proceeds. We first introduce WMR dynamics, tire model and problem formulation of the WMR. We then design drift-driving control using human strategy (control side slip angle and yaw rate). The drift-driving control consists of high-level control, optimization to find desired control input and high-gain control. We analyze the uncontrolled velocity dynamics and stability of the controller. The CarSim simulation results of drift-driving on steady-state equilibriums and the hairpin path with the desired yaw rate are provided.List of Figures - v List of Tables - vi Abbreviations - vii 1 Introduction - 1 1.1 Motivation and related works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Contribution of this work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 System Modeling - 5 2.1 Model dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Tire model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3 Problemformulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3 Drift-Driving Control Design - 10 3.1 High-level control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2 Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.3 High-gain control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4 Analysis of Control - 17 4.1 Internal dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.2 Stability analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5 Simulation Results - 25 5.1 Simulation setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.2 Steady-state drift-driving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.3 Hairpin turn drift-driving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6 Conclusion and Future Work - 40 6.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.2 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Maste

    Keep Rollin' - Whole-Body Motion Control and Planning for Wheeled Quadrupedal Robots

    Full text link
    We show dynamic locomotion strategies for wheeled quadrupedal robots, which combine the advantages of both walking and driving. The developed optimization framework tightly integrates the additional degrees of freedom introduced by the wheels. Our approach relies on a zero-moment point based motion optimization which continuously updates reference trajectories. The reference motions are tracked by a hierarchical whole-body controller which computes optimal generalized accelerations and contact forces by solving a sequence of prioritized tasks including the nonholonomic rolling constraints. Our approach has been tested on ANYmal, a quadrupedal robot that is fully torque-controlled including the non-steerable wheels attached to its legs. We conducted experiments on flat and inclined terrains as well as over steps, whereby we show that integrating the wheels into the motion control and planning framework results in intuitive motion trajectories, which enable more robust and dynamic locomotion compared to other wheeled-legged robots. Moreover, with a speed of 4 m/s and a reduction of the cost of transport by 83 % we prove the superiority of wheeled-legged robots compared to their legged counterparts.Comment: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letter

    Intelligent controllers for velocity tracking of two wheeled inverted pendulum mobile robot

    Get PDF
    Velocity tracking is one of the important objectives of vehicle, machines and mobile robots. A two wheeled inverted pendulum (TWIP) is a class of mobile robot that is open loop unstable with high nonlinearities which makes it difficult to control its velocity because of its nature of pitch falling if left unattended. In this work, three soft computing techniques were proposed to track a desired velocity of the TWIP. Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC), Neural Network Inverse Model control (NN) and an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) were designed and simulated on the TWIP model. All the three controllers have shown practically good performance in tracking the desired speed and keeping the robot in upright position and ANFIS has shown slightly better performance than FLC, while NN consumes more energy

    Research studio for testing control algorithms of mobile robots

    Get PDF
    In recent years, a significant development of technologies related to the control and communication of mobile robots, including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, has been noticeable. Developing these technologies requires having the necessary hardware and software to enable prototyping and simulation of control algorithms in laboratory conditions.The article presents the Laboratory of Intelligent Mobile Robots equipped with the latest solutions. The laboratory equipment consists of four quadcopter drones (QDrone) and two wheeled robots (QBot), equipped with rich sensor sets, a ground control station with Matlab-Simulink software, OptiTRACK object tracking system, and the necessary infrastructure for communication and security.The paper presents the results of measurements from sensors of robots monitoring various quantities during work. The measurements concerned, among others, the quantities of robots registered by IMU sensors of the tested robots (i.e., accelerometers, magnetometers, gyroscopes and others)

    Autonomous Hybrid Ground/Aerial Mobility in Unknown Environments

    Full text link
    Hybrid ground and aerial vehicles can possess distinct advantages over ground-only or flight-only designs in terms of energy savings and increased mobility. In this work we outline our unified framework for controls, planning, and autonomy of hybrid ground/air vehicles. Our contribution is three-fold: 1) We develop a control scheme for the control of passive two-wheeled hybrid ground/aerial vehicles. 2) We present a unified planner for both rolling and flying by leveraging differential flatness mappings. 3) We conduct experiments leveraging mapping and global planning for hybrid mobility in unknown environments, showing that hybrid mobility uses up to five times less energy than flying only
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore