5 research outputs found

    Approximate Computing Survey, Part I: Terminology and Software & Hardware Approximation Techniques

    Full text link
    The rapid growth of demanding applications in domains applying multimedia processing and machine learning has marked a new era for edge and cloud computing. These applications involve massive data and compute-intensive tasks, and thus, typical computing paradigms in embedded systems and data centers are stressed to meet the worldwide demand for high performance. Concurrently, the landscape of the semiconductor field in the last 15 years has constituted power as a first-class design concern. As a result, the community of computing systems is forced to find alternative design approaches to facilitate high-performance and/or power-efficient computing. Among the examined solutions, Approximate Computing has attracted an ever-increasing interest, with research works applying approximations across the entire traditional computing stack, i.e., at software, hardware, and architectural levels. Over the last decade, there is a plethora of approximation techniques in software (programs, frameworks, compilers, runtimes, languages), hardware (circuits, accelerators), and architectures (processors, memories). The current article is Part I of our comprehensive survey on Approximate Computing, and it reviews its motivation, terminology and principles, as well it classifies and presents the technical details of the state-of-the-art software and hardware approximation techniques.Comment: Under Review at ACM Computing Survey

    Approximate Computing Survey, Part II: Application-Specific & Architectural Approximation Techniques and Applications

    Full text link
    The challenging deployment of compute-intensive applications from domains such Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Digital Signal Processing (DSP), forces the community of computing systems to explore new design approaches. Approximate Computing appears as an emerging solution, allowing to tune the quality of results in the design of a system in order to improve the energy efficiency and/or performance. This radical paradigm shift has attracted interest from both academia and industry, resulting in significant research on approximation techniques and methodologies at different design layers (from system down to integrated circuits). Motivated by the wide appeal of Approximate Computing over the last 10 years, we conduct a two-part survey to cover key aspects (e.g., terminology and applications) and review the state-of-the art approximation techniques from all layers of the traditional computing stack. In Part II of our survey, we classify and present the technical details of application-specific and architectural approximation techniques, which both target the design of resource-efficient processors/accelerators & systems. Moreover, we present a detailed analysis of the application spectrum of Approximate Computing and discuss open challenges and future directions.Comment: Under Review at ACM Computing Survey

    Towards automatic significance analysis for approximate computing

    No full text
    Several applications may trade-off output quality for energy efficiency by computing only an approximation of their output. Current approaches to software-based approximate computing often require the programmer to specify parts of the code or data structures that can be approximated. A largely unaddressed challenge is how to automate the analysis of the significance of code for the output quality. To this end, we propose a methodology and toolset for automatic significance analysis. We use interval arithmetic and algorithmic differentiation in our profile-driven yet mathematical approach to evaluate the significance of input and intermediate variables for the output of a computation. Our methodology effectively matches decisions of a domain expert in significance characterization for a set of benchmarks, and in some cases offers new insights. Evaluation of the software infrastructure on a multicore x86 platform shows energy reduction (from 31% up to 91% with a mean of 56%) compared to fully accurate execution, with graceful quality degradation. © 2016 ACM
    corecore