BLEU Meets COMET: Combining Lexical and Neural Metrics Towards Robust Machine Translation Evaluation

Although neural-based machine translation evaluation metrics, such as COMET or BLEURT, have achieved strong correlations with human judgements, they are sometimes unreliable in detecting certain phenomena that can be considered as critical errors, such as deviations in entities and numbers. In contrast, traditional evaluation metrics, such as BLEU or chrF, which measure lexical or character overlap between translation hypotheses and human references, have lower correlations with human judgements but are sensitive to such deviations. In this paper, we investigate several ways of combining the two approaches in order to increase robustness of state-of-the-art evaluation methods to translations with critical errors. We show that by using additional information during training, such as sentence-level features and word-level tags, the trained metrics improve their capability to penalize translations with specific troublesome phenomena, which leads to gains in correlation with human judgments and on recent challenge sets on several language pairs.Comment: Accepted at EAMT 202

An Analysis of Source-Side Grammatical Errors in NMT

The quality of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) has been shown to significantly degrade when confronted with source-side noise. We present the first large-scale study of state-of-the-art English-to-German NMT on real grammatical noise, by evaluating on several Grammar Correction corpora. We present methods for evaluating NMT robustness without true references, and we use them for extensive analysis of the effects that different grammatical errors have on the NMT output. We also introduce a technique for visualizing the divergence distribution caused by a source-side error, which allows for additional insights.Comment: Accepted and to be presented at BlackboxNLP 201

Robust Beam Search for Encoder-Decoder Attention Based Speech Recognition without Length Bias

As one popular modeling approach for end-to-end speech recognition, attention-based encoder-decoder models are known to suffer the length bias and corresponding beam problem. Different approaches have been applied in simple beam search to ease the problem, most of which are heuristic-based and require considerable tuning. We show that heuristics are not proper modeling refinement, which results in severe performance degradation with largely increased beam sizes. We propose a novel beam search derived from reinterpreting the sequence posterior with an explicit length modeling. By applying the reinterpreted probability together with beam pruning, the obtained final probability leads to a robust model modification, which allows reliable comparison among output sequences of different lengths. Experimental verification on the LibriSpeech corpus shows that the proposed approach solves the length bias problem without heuristics or additional tuning effort. It provides robust decision making and consistently good performance under both small and very large beam sizes. Compared with the best results of the heuristic baseline, the proposed approach achieves the same WER on the 'clean' sets and 4% relative improvement on the 'other' sets. We also show that it is more efficient with the additional derived early stopping criterion.Comment: accepted at INTERSPEECH202