Timing Verification of Sequential Dynamic Circuits

This paper addresses static timing verification for sequential circuits implemented in a mix of static and dynamic logic. We restrict our focus to regular domino logic and footless domino logic, a variant of domino logic. First we derive constraints for proper operation of dynamic gates. An important observation is that for dynamic gates, input signals may start changing near the end of the evaluate phase without compromising correct operation. This gives the circuit designer extra flexibility. We present two verification methods. Both are based on the Sakallah--Mudge--Olukotun (SMO) model for static timing analysis of sequential circuits. The first method models dynamic gates explicitly. The signals at the terminals of the dynamic gates are modeled by five events: the earliest/latest, rising/falling transitions, and a fifth event that models the occurrence of a spurious rising transition. The second method applies the original SMO model after a preprocessing step that computes the com..

Timing Verification of Sequential Dynamic Circuits

Abstract — This paper addresses static timing verification for sequential circuits implemented in a mix of static and dynamic logic. We restrict our focus to regular domino logic and footless domino logic, a variant of domino logic. First we derive constraints for proper operation of dynamic gates. An important observation is that for dynamic gates, input signals may start changing near the end of the evaluate phase without compromising correct operation. This gives the circuit designer extra flexibility. We present two verification methods. Both are based on the Sakallah–Mudge–Olukotun (SMO) model for static timing analysis of sequential circuits. The first method models dynamic gates explicitly. The signals at the terminals of the dynamic gates are modeled by five events: the earliest/latest, rising/falling transitions, and a fifth event that models the occurrence of a spurious rising transition. The second method applies the original SMO model after a preprocessing step that computes the combinational delays. A postprocessing step checks the constraints specific to dynamic gates. The relationship between both methods is studied. We show that the second method may result in a more conservative analysis than the first method, but at a lower computational cost. We also examine a less aggressive set of constraints, which disallows spurious transitions. A detailed example illustrating the important features of the model is presented, and an electrical simulation of that circuit is performed. The results demonstrate the practical relevance of the methods. Index Terms—Modeling, timing verification. I