763 research outputs found
Complexity of Non-Monotonic Logics
Over the past few decades, non-monotonic reasoning has developed to be one of
the most important topics in computational logic and artificial intelligence.
Different ways to introduce non-monotonic aspects to classical logic have been
considered, e.g., extension with default rules, extension with modal belief
operators, or modification of the semantics. In this survey we consider a
logical formalism from each of the above possibilities, namely Reiter's default
logic, Moore's autoepistemic logic and McCarthy's circumscription.
Additionally, we consider abduction, where one is not interested in inferences
from a given knowledge base but in computing possible explanations for an
observation with respect to a given knowledge base.
Complexity results for different reasoning tasks for propositional variants
of these logics have been studied already in the nineties. In recent years,
however, a renewed interest in complexity issues can be observed. One current
focal approach is to consider parameterized problems and identify reasonable
parameters that allow for FPT algorithms. In another approach, the emphasis
lies on identifying fragments, i.e., restriction of the logical language, that
allow more efficient algorithms for the most important reasoning tasks. In this
survey we focus on this second aspect. We describe complexity results for
fragments of logical languages obtained by either restricting the allowed set
of operators (e.g., forbidding negations one might consider only monotone
formulae) or by considering only formulae in conjunctive normal form but with
generalized clause types.
The algorithmic problems we consider are suitable variants of satisfiability
and implication in each of the logics, but also counting problems, where one is
not only interested in the existence of certain objects (e.g., models of a
formula) but asks for their number.Comment: To appear in Bulletin of the EATC
Implementing Default and Autoepistemic Logics via the Logic of GK
The logic of knowledge and justified assumptions, also known as logic of
grounded knowledge (GK), was proposed by Lin and Shoham as a general logic for
nonmonotonic reasoning. To date, it has been used to embed in it default logic
(propositional case), autoepistemic logic, Turner's logic of universal
causation, and general logic programming under stable model semantics. Besides
showing the generality of GK as a logic for nonmonotonic reasoning, these
embeddings shed light on the relationships among these other logics. In this
paper, for the first time, we show how the logic of GK can be embedded into
disjunctive logic programming in a polynomial but non-modular translation with
new variables. The result can then be used to compute the extension/expansion
semantics of default logic, autoepistemic logic and Turner's logic of universal
causation by disjunctive ASP solvers such as claspD(-2), DLV, GNT and cmodels.Comment: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic
Reasoning (NMR 2014
Super Logic Programs
The Autoepistemic Logic of Knowledge and Belief (AELB) is a powerful
nonmonotic formalism introduced by Teodor Przymusinski in 1994. In this paper,
we specialize it to a class of theories called `super logic programs'. We argue
that these programs form a natural generalization of standard logic programs.
In particular, they allow disjunctions and default negation of arbibrary
positive objective formulas.
Our main results are two new and powerful characterizations of the static
semant ics of these programs, one syntactic, and one model-theoretic. The
syntactic fixed point characterization is much simpler than the fixed point
construction of the static semantics for arbitrary AELB theories. The
model-theoretic characterization via Kripke models allows one to construct
finite representations of the inherently infinite static expansions.
Both characterizations can be used as the basis of algorithms for query
answering under the static semantics. We describe a query-answering interpreter
for super programs which we developed based on the model-theoretic
characterization and which is available on the web.Comment: 47 pages, revised version of the paper submitted 10/200
Monotonicity and Persistence in Preferential Logics
An important characteristic of many logics for Artificial Intelligence is
their nonmonotonicity. This means that adding a formula to the premises can
invalidate some of the consequences. There may, however, exist formulae that
can always be safely added to the premises without destroying any of the
consequences: we say they respect monotonicity. Also, there may be formulae
that, when they are a consequence, can not be invalidated when adding any
formula to the premises: we call them conservative. We study these two classes
of formulae for preferential logics, and show that they are closely linked to
the formulae whose truth-value is preserved along the (preferential) ordering.
We will consider some preferential logics for illustration, and prove syntactic
characterization results for them. The results in this paper may improve the
efficiency of theorem provers for preferential logics.Comment: See http://www.jair.org/ for any accompanying file
Applications of Intuitionistic Logic in Answer Set Programming
We present some applications of intermediate logics in the field of Answer
Set Programming (ASP). A brief, but comprehensive introduction to the answer
set semantics, intuitionistic and other intermediate logics is given. Some
equivalence notions and their applications are discussed. Some results on
intermediate logics are shown, and applied later to prove properties of answer
sets. A characterization of answer sets for logic programs with nested
expressions is provided in terms of intuitionistic provability, generalizing a
recent result given by Pearce.
It is known that the answer set semantics for logic programs with nested
expressions may select non-minimal models. Minimal models can be very important
in some applications, therefore we studied them; in particular we obtain a
characterization, in terms of intuitionistic logic, of answer sets which are
also minimal models. We show that the logic G3 characterizes the notion of
strong equivalence between programs under the semantic induced by these models.
Finally we discuss possible applications and consequences of our results. They
clearly state interesting links between ASP and intermediate logics, which
might bring research in these two areas together.Comment: 30 pages, Under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice
of Logic Programmin
- …