Methods for protein complex prediction and their contributions towards understanding the organization, function and dynamics of complexes

Complexes of physically interacting proteins constitute fundamental functional units responsible for driving biological processes within cells. A faithful reconstruction of the entire set of complexes is therefore essential to understand the functional organization of cells. In this review, we discuss the key contributions of computational methods developed till date (approximately between 2003 and 2015) for identifying complexes from the network of interacting proteins (PPI network). We evaluate in depth the performance of these methods on PPI datasets from yeast, and highlight challenges faced by these methods, in particular detection of sparse and small or sub- complexes and discerning of overlapping complexes. We describe methods for integrating diverse information including expression profiles and 3D structures of proteins with PPI networks to understand the dynamics of complex formation, for instance, of time-based assembly of complex subunits and formation of fuzzy complexes from intrinsically disordered proteins. Finally, we discuss methods for identifying dysfunctional complexes in human diseases, an application that is proving invaluable to understand disease mechanisms and to discover novel therapeutic targets. We hope this review aptly commemorates a decade of research on computational prediction of complexes and constitutes a valuable reference for further advancements in this exciting area.Comment: 1 Tabl

Computational Proteomics Using Network-Based Strategies

This thesis examines the productive application of networks towards proteomics, with a specific biological focus on liver cancer. Contempory proteomics (shot- gun) is plagued by coverage and consistency issues. These can be resolved via network-based approaches. The application of 3 classes of network-based approaches are examined: A traditional cluster based approach termed Proteomics Expansion Pipeline), a generalization of PEP termed Maxlink and a feature-based approach termed Proteomics Signature Profiling. PEP is an improvement on prevailing cluster-based approaches. It uses a state- of-the-art cluster identification algorithm as well as network-cleaning approaches to identify the critical network regions indicated by the liver cancer data set. The top PARP1 associated-cluster was identified and independently validated. Maxlink allows identification of undetected proteins based on the number of links to identified differential proteins. It is more sensitive than PEP due to more relaxed requirements. Here, the novel roles of ARRB1/2 and ACTB are identified and discussed in the context of liver cancer. Both PEP and Maxlink are unable to deal with consistency issues, PSP is the first method able to deal with both, and is termed feature-based since the network- based clusters it uses are predicted independently of the data. It is also capable of using real complexes or predicted pathway subnets. By combining pathways and complexes, a novel basis of liver cancer progression implicating nucleotide pool imbalance aggravated by mutations of key DNA repair complexes was identified. Finally, comparative evaluations suggested that pure network-based methods are vastly outperformed by feature-based network methods utilizing real complexes. This is indicative that the quality of current networks are insufficient to provide strong biological rigor for data analysis, and should be carefully evaluated before further validations.Open Acces

CHARACTERISATION OF STRUCTURAL PLASTICITY OF THE VISUAL CORTEX IN PRMT8 NULL MICE?

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

The role of miRNAs in complex formation and control

10.1093/bioinformatics/btr693Bioinformatics284453-456BOIN