59,821 research outputs found
Making proofs without Modus Ponens: An introduction to the combinatorics and complexity of cut elimination
This paper is intended to provide an introduction to cut elimination which is
accessible to a broad mathematical audience. Gentzen's cut elimination theorem
is not as well known as it deserves to be, and it is tied to a lot of
interesting mathematical structure. In particular we try to indicate some
dynamical and combinatorial aspects of cut elimination, as well as its
connections to complexity theory. We discuss two concrete examples where one
can see the structure of short proofs with cuts, one concerning feasible
numbers and the other concerning "bounded mean oscillation" from real analysis
The First-Order Theory of Sets with Cardinality Constraints is Decidable
We show that the decidability of the first-order theory of the language that
combines Boolean algebras of sets of uninterpreted elements with Presburger
arithmetic operations. We thereby disprove a recent conjecture that this theory
is undecidable. Our language allows relating the cardinalities of sets to the
values of integer variables, and can distinguish finite and infinite sets. We
use quantifier elimination to show the decidability and obtain an elementary
upper bound on the complexity.
Precise program analyses can use our decidability result to verify
representation invariants of data structures that use an integer field to
represent the number of stored elements.Comment: 18 page
Proof-graphs for Minimal Implicational Logic
It is well-known that the size of propositional classical proofs can be huge.
Proof theoretical studies discovered exponential gaps between normal or cut
free proofs and their respective non-normal proofs. The aim of this work is to
study how to reduce the weight of propositional deductions. We present the
formalism of proof-graphs for purely implicational logic, which are graphs of a
specific shape that are intended to capture the logical structure of a
deduction. The advantage of this formalism is that formulas can be shared in
the reduced proof.
In the present paper we give a precise definition of proof-graphs for the
minimal implicational logic, together with a normalization procedure for these
proof-graphs. In contrast to standard tree-like formalisms, our normalization
does not increase the number of nodes, when applied to the corresponding
minimal proof-graph representations.Comment: In Proceedings DCM 2013, arXiv:1403.768
Expansion Trees with Cut
Herbrand's theorem is one of the most fundamental insights in logic. From the
syntactic point of view it suggests a compact representation of proofs in
classical first- and higher-order logic by recording the information which
instances have been chosen for which quantifiers, known in the literature as
expansion trees.
Such a representation is inherently analytic and hence corresponds to a
cut-free sequent calculus proof. Recently several extensions of such proof
representations to proofs with cut have been proposed. These extensions are
based on graphical formalisms similar to proof nets and are limited to prenex
formulas.
In this paper we present a new approach that directly extends expansion trees
by cuts and covers also non-prenex formulas. We describe a cut-elimination
procedure for our expansion trees with cut that is based on the natural
reduction steps. We prove that it is weakly normalizing using methods from the
epsilon-calculus
An Instantiation-Based Approach for Solving Quantified Linear Arithmetic
This paper presents a framework to derive instantiation-based decision
procedures for satisfiability of quantified formulas in first-order theories,
including its correctness, implementation, and evaluation. Using this framework
we derive decision procedures for linear real arithmetic (LRA) and linear
integer arithmetic (LIA) formulas with one quantifier alternation. Our
procedure can be integrated into the solving architecture used by typical SMT
solvers. Experimental results on standardized benchmarks from model checking,
static analysis, and synthesis show that our implementation of the procedure in
the SMT solver CVC4 outperforms existing tools for quantified linear
arithmetic
Propositional Logics Complexity and the Sub-Formula Property
In 1979 Richard Statman proved, using proof-theory, that the purely
implicational fragment of Intuitionistic Logic (M-imply) is PSPACE-complete. He
showed a polynomially bounded translation from full Intuitionistic
Propositional Logic into its implicational fragment. By the PSPACE-completeness
of S4, proved by Ladner, and the Goedel translation from S4 into Intuitionistic
Logic, the PSPACE- completeness of M-imply is drawn. The sub-formula principle
for a deductive system for a logic L states that whenever F1,...,Fk proves A,
there is a proof in which each formula occurrence is either a sub-formula of A
or of some of Fi. In this work we extend Statman result and show that any
propositional (possibly modal) structural logic satisfying a particular
formulation of the sub-formula principle is in PSPACE. If the logic includes
the minimal purely implicational logic then it is PSPACE-complete. As a
consequence, EXPTIME-complete propositional logics, such as PDL and the
common-knowledge epistemic logic with at least 2 agents satisfy this particular
sub-formula principle, if and only if, PSPACE=EXPTIME. We also show how our
technique can be used to prove that any finitely many-valued logic has the set
of its tautologies in PSPACE.Comment: In Proceedings DCM 2014, arXiv:1504.0192
- …