The complexity of some regex crossword problems

In a typical regular expression (regex) crossword puzzle, you are given two nonempty lists $R_1,\ldots,R_m$ and $C_1,\ldots,C_n$ of regular expressions over some alphabet, and your goal is to fill in an $m\times n$ grid with letters from that alphabet so that the string formed by the $i$th row is in $L(R_i)$, and the string formed by the $j$th column is in $L(C_j)$, for all $1\le i\le m$ and $1\le j\le n$. Such a grid is a solution to the puzzle. It is known that determining whether a solution exists is NP-complete. We consider a number of restrictions and variants to this problem where all the $R_i$ are equal to some regular expression $R$, and all the $C_j$ are equal to some regular expression $C$. We call the solution to such a puzzle an $(R,C)$-crossword. Our main results are the following: 1. There exists a fixed regular expression $C$ over the alphabet $\{0,1\}$ such that the following problem is NP-complete: "Given a regular expression $R$ over $\{0,1\}$ and positive integers $m$ and $n$ given in unary, does an $m\times n$ $(R,C)$-crossword exist?" This improves the result mentioned above. 2. The following problem is NP-hard: "Given a regular expression $E$ over $\{0,1\}$ and positive integers $m$ and $n$ given in unary, does an $m\times n$ $(E,E)$-crossword exist?" 3. There exists a fixed regular expression $C$ over $\{0,1\}$ such that the following problem is undecidable (equivalent to the Halting Problem): "Given a regular expression $R$ over $\{0,1\}$, does an $(R,C)$-crossword exist (of any size)?" 4. The following problem is undecidable (equivalent to the Halting Problem): "Given a regular expression $E$ over $\{0,1\}$, does an $(E,E)$-crossword exist (of any size)?"Comment: 25 pages, 3 figures; three references added with explanation, citation added to Corollary 5, more detail in proof of Theorem 8, other minor corrections (results unchanged