60,528 research outputs found
Turing machines can be efficiently simulated by the General Purpose Analog Computer
The Church-Turing thesis states that any sufficiently powerful computational
model which captures the notion of algorithm is computationally equivalent to
the Turing machine. This equivalence usually holds both at a computability
level and at a computational complexity level modulo polynomial reductions.
However, the situation is less clear in what concerns models of computation
using real numbers, and no analog of the Church-Turing thesis exists for this
case. Recently it was shown that some models of computation with real numbers
were equivalent from a computability perspective. In particular it was shown
that Shannon's General Purpose Analog Computer (GPAC) is equivalent to
Computable Analysis. However, little is known about what happens at a
computational complexity level. In this paper we shed some light on the
connections between this two models, from a computational complexity level, by
showing that, modulo polynomial reductions, computations of Turing machines can
be simulated by GPACs, without the need of using more (space) resources than
those used in the original Turing computation, as long as we are talking about
bounded computations. In other words, computations done by the GPAC are as
space-efficient as computations done in the context of Computable Analysis
Turing Automata and Graph Machines
Indexed monoidal algebras are introduced as an equivalent structure for
self-dual compact closed categories, and a coherence theorem is proved for the
category of such algebras. Turing automata and Turing graph machines are
defined by generalizing the classical Turing machine concept, so that the
collection of such machines becomes an indexed monoidal algebra. On the analogy
of the von Neumann data-flow computer architecture, Turing graph machines are
proposed as potentially reversible low-level universal computational devices,
and a truly reversible molecular size hardware model is presented as an
example
Zeno machines and hypercomputation
This paper reviews the Church-Turing Thesis (or rather, theses) with
reference to their origin and application and considers some models of
"hypercomputation", concentrating on perhaps the most straight-forward option:
Zeno machines (Turing machines with accelerating clock). The halting problem is
briefly discussed in a general context and the suggestion that it is an
inevitable companion of any reasonable computational model is emphasised. It is
hinted that claims to have "broken the Turing barrier" could be toned down and
that the important and well-founded role of Turing computability in the
mathematical sciences stands unchallenged.Comment: 11 pages. First submitted in December 2004, substantially revised in
July and in November 2005. To appear in Theoretical Computer Scienc
The Computational Complexity of Symbolic Dynamics at the Onset of Chaos
In a variety of studies of dynamical systems, the edge of order and chaos has
been singled out as a region of complexity. It was suggested by Wolfram, on the
basis of qualitative behaviour of cellular automata, that the computational
basis for modelling this region is the Universal Turing Machine. In this paper,
following a suggestion of Crutchfield, we try to show that the Turing machine
model may often be too powerful as a computational model to describe the
boundary of order and chaos. In particular we study the region of the first
accumulation of period doubling in unimodal and bimodal maps of the interval,
from the point of view of language theory. We show that in relation to the
``extended'' Chomsky hierarchy, the relevant computational model in the
unimodal case is the nested stack automaton or the related indexed languages,
while the bimodal case is modeled by the linear bounded automaton or the
related context-sensitive languages.Comment: 1 reference corrected, 1 reference added, minor changes in body of
manuscrip
- …