319 research outputs found
Hardness of Approximation in PSPACE and Separation Results for Pebble Games
We consider the pebble game on DAGs with bounded fan-in introduced in
[Paterson and Hewitt '70] and the reversible version of this game in [Bennett
'89], and study the question of how hard it is to decide exactly or
approximately the number of pebbles needed for a given DAG in these games. We
prove that the problem of eciding whether ~pebbles suffice to reversibly
pebble a DAG is PSPACE-complete, as was previously shown for the standard
pebble game in [Gilbert, Lengauer and Tarjan '80]. Via two different graph
product constructions we then strengthen these results to establish that both
standard and reversible pebbling space are PSPACE-hard to approximate to within
any additive constant. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first
hardness of approximation results for pebble games in an unrestricted setting
(even for polynomial time). Also, since [Chan '13] proved that reversible
pebbling is equivalent to the games in [Dymond and Tompa '85] and [Raz and
McKenzie '99], our results apply to the Dymond--Tompa and Raz--McKenzie games
as well, and from the same paper it follows that resolution depth is
PSPACE-hard to determine up to any additive constant. We also obtain a
multiplicative logarithmic separation between reversible and standard pebbling
space. This improves on the additive logarithmic separation previously known
and could plausibly be tight, although we are not able to prove this. We leave
as an interesting open problem whether our additive hardness of approximation
result could be strengthened to a multiplicative bound if the computational
resources are decreased from polynomial space to the more common setting of
polynomial time
On the Relative Strength of Pebbling and Resolution
The last decade has seen a revival of interest in pebble games in the context
of proof complexity. Pebbling has proven a useful tool for studying
resolution-based proof systems when comparing the strength of different
subsystems, showing bounds on proof space, and establishing size-space
trade-offs. The typical approach has been to encode the pebble game played on a
graph as a CNF formula and then argue that proofs of this formula must inherit
(various aspects of) the pebbling properties of the underlying graph.
Unfortunately, the reductions used here are not tight. To simulate resolution
proofs by pebblings, the full strength of nondeterministic black-white pebbling
is needed, whereas resolution is only known to be able to simulate
deterministic black pebbling. To obtain strong results, one therefore needs to
find specific graph families which either have essentially the same properties
for black and black-white pebbling (not at all true in general) or which admit
simulations of black-white pebblings in resolution. This paper contributes to
both these approaches. First, we design a restricted form of black-white
pebbling that can be simulated in resolution and show that there are graph
families for which such restricted pebblings can be asymptotically better than
black pebblings. This proves that, perhaps somewhat unexpectedly, resolution
can strictly beat black-only pebbling, and in particular that the space lower
bounds on pebbling formulas in [Ben-Sasson and Nordstrom 2008] are tight.
Second, we present a versatile parametrized graph family with essentially the
same properties for black and black-white pebbling, which gives sharp
simultaneous trade-offs for black and black-white pebbling for various
parameter settings. Both of our contributions have been instrumental in
obtaining the time-space trade-off results for resolution-based proof systems
in [Ben-Sasson and Nordstrom 2009].Comment: Full-length version of paper to appear in Proceedings of the 25th
Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC '10), June 201
Understanding Space in Proof Complexity: Separations and Trade-offs via Substitutions
For current state-of-the-art DPLL SAT-solvers the two main bottlenecks are
the amounts of time and memory used. In proof complexity, these resources
correspond to the length and space of resolution proofs. There has been a long
line of research investigating these proof complexity measures, but while
strong results have been established for length, our understanding of space and
how it relates to length has remained quite poor. In particular, the question
whether resolution proofs can be optimized for length and space simultaneously,
or whether there are trade-offs between these two measures, has remained
essentially open.
In this paper, we remedy this situation by proving a host of length-space
trade-off results for resolution. Our collection of trade-offs cover almost the
whole range of values for the space complexity of formulas, and most of the
trade-offs are superpolynomial or even exponential and essentially tight. Using
similar techniques, we show that these trade-offs in fact extend to the
exponentially stronger k-DNF resolution proof systems, which operate with
formulas in disjunctive normal form with terms of bounded arity k. We also
answer the open question whether the k-DNF resolution systems form a strict
hierarchy with respect to space in the affirmative.
Our key technical contribution is the following, somewhat surprising,
theorem: Any CNF formula F can be transformed by simple variable substitution
into a new formula F' such that if F has the right properties, F' can be proven
in essentially the same length as F, whereas on the other hand the minimal
number of lines one needs to keep in memory simultaneously in any proof of F'
is lower-bounded by the minimal number of variables needed simultaneously in
any proof of F. Applying this theorem to so-called pebbling formulas defined in
terms of pebble games on directed acyclic graphs, we obtain our results.Comment: This paper is a merged and updated version of the two ECCC technical
reports TR09-034 and TR09-047, and it hence subsumes these two report
Completeness Results for Parameterized Space Classes
The parameterized complexity of a problem is considered "settled" once it has
been shown to lie in FPT or to be complete for a class in the W-hierarchy or a
similar parameterized hierarchy. Several natural parameterized problems have,
however, resisted such a classification. At least in some cases, the reason is
that upper and lower bounds for their parameterized space complexity have
recently been obtained that rule out completeness results for parameterized
time classes. In this paper, we make progress in this direction by proving that
the associative generability problem and the longest common subsequence problem
are complete for parameterized space classes. These classes are defined in
terms of different forms of bounded nondeterminism and in terms of simultaneous
time--space bounds. As a technical tool we introduce a "union operation" that
translates between problems complete for classical complexity classes and for
W-classes.Comment: IPEC 201
Inapproximability of the Standard Pebble Game and Hard to Pebble Graphs
Pebble games are single-player games on DAGs involving placing and moving
pebbles on nodes of the graph according to a certain set of rules. The goal is
to pebble a set of target nodes using a minimum number of pebbles. In this
paper, we present a possibly simpler proof of the result in [CLNV15] and
strengthen the result to show that it is PSPACE-hard to determine the minimum
number of pebbles to an additive term for all , which improves upon the currently known additive constant hardness of
approximation [CLNV15] in the standard pebble game. We also introduce a family
of explicit, constant indegree graphs with nodes where there exists a graph
in the family such that using constant pebbles requires moves
to pebble in both the standard and black-white pebble games. This independently
answers an open question summarized in [Nor15] of whether a family of DAGs
exists that meets the upper bound of moves using constant pebbles
with a different construction than that presented in [AdRNV17].Comment: Preliminary version in WADS 201
- …