2016 Abstract Book

This booklet contains all the abstracts from the 2016 forum held at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Coordinated by the Center for Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities, a unit in the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research

Outcomes of MR-guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) or yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated at an Urban Liver Transplant Center

Background: There are overlapping indications for both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and yttrium-90 (Y90) trans-arterial radioembolization as locoregional treatments for hepatocellular cancer, though most centers preferentially use one modality over the other. MR-guided radiation allows both effective on-table localization and integrated motion management as compared with many traditional linear accelerators, allowing SBRT to be done more easily. Y90 radioembolization has been a well-established modality to deliver highly conformal dose due to the localization of the microspheres to the vascular supply of a tumor. We looked at patient characteristics and treatment outcomes for patients receiving MR-guided SBRT or Y90 at an urban transplant center. Objectives: To compare patient characteristics and treatment outcomes of MR-guided SBRT with Y90 transarterial radioembolization in a liver transplant center. Methods: This retrospective single-institution study analyzed patients with HCC treated with SBRT or Y90 from August 2017 to September 2020. To select a patient population eligible for either treatment modality, any Y90 procedures for lesions \u3e 10 cm or for treatment volumes \u3e 1000 cc were omitted from the cohort. A total of 239 patients were included in the analysis, receiving a total of 98 courses of SBRT and 187 courses of Y90 treatment. Local control (LC), freedom from liver progression (FFLP), and overall survival (OS) rates were measured from treatment completion date to death date or last follow-up. All outcomes were censored at time of loss to follow-up; LC and FFLP were censored at time of liver transplant if applicable. Cox regression models were used for survival, with significant factors on the univariate analysis further analyzed with a multivariate model. Results: Median time to follow-up was 11 months (0-44 mo). The mean size of lesions treated with SBRT were smaller than those treated with Y90 (2.7 cm vs 4.3 cm, P\u3c0.01). The groups of patients differed in liver disease characteristics, with SBRT patients having fewer Child-Pugh A disease (62% vs 80%, P\u3c0.01), more having received locoregional treatments to the liver in the past (81% v 35%, P\u3c0.01), and more disease in previously treated liver (57% vs 25%, P\u3c0.01). Dose of radiation for SBRT was 45-50 Gy administered in 5 fractions; dose of Y90 radiation to tumor was prescribed to a median of 235.2 Gy (range 55.8-512.3 Gy). There was a higher rate of one year LC in the SBRT cohort (77% vs 57%, P\u3c0.01), while median FFLP (9 mo vs 8 mo, P=NS) and median OS were not significantly different (24 mo vs 21 mo, P=NS). Multivariate analysis revealed size of largest lesion (P\u3c0.01) was correlated with decreased local control; a 1 cm increase in tumor size was associated with a 25% increased risk of local failure. Subsequent transplant (P\u3c0.01) was the remaining significant factor. Treatment modality did not remain an independent predictor of LC. Predictors of OS in multivariate analysis included age (P=0.01), prior liver treatments (HR 2.86, P\u3c0.01), size of largest lesion (P\u3c0.01), Child-Pugh stage (P\u3c0.01), portal vein thrombosis (HR 1.6, P=0.04), and subsequent liver transplant (HR 0.08, P\u3c0.01). Conclusions: These findings support the effectiveness of both MR-guided SBRT and Y90 transarterial radioembolization in locoregional management of HCC at a single institution despite clear differences in the patient cohorts. Though survival outcomes were comparable, local control differences favored the cohort treated by SBRT, in large part due to differences in tumor size. This data supports further investigation in a randomized study between SBRT and Y90

Survival Outcomes and Patterns of Recurrence After Adjuvant Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy and Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Background: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a relatively rare histology that portends a poor prognosis. The optimal adjuvant therapy for early-stage USC remains controversial; however, adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VB) and chemotherapy is a commonly utilized strategy. Objectives: We sought to characterize predictors of survival endpoints and determine recurrence patterns in women with early-stage USC who received adjuvant VB and chemotherapy. Methods: We queried our prospectively maintained database for patients with 2009 FIGO stages I-II USC who underwent adequate surgical staging at our institution and received adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel along with VB. We excluded women with synchronous malignancies. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to identify statistically significant predictors of survival endpoints. Variables with P\u3c0.1 on UVA were included in a MVA and any variable with P\u3c0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We identified 77 women who met our inclusion criteria who underwent surgical staging between 1991 and 2018. The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 6-125). The median age was 66 years. Of the cohort, 70% were FIGO stage IA, 17% were stage IB, and 13% were stage II. The median number of dissected lymph nodes (LN) was 22. There were 10 women (13%) diagnosed with a recurrence with a median time to recurrence of 12.0 months. The main site of initial recurrence was distant in seven patients (70%) with the remaining recurrences being pelvic/para-aortic. The 5-year RFS for patients who experienced a distant recurrence was 87% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.75-0.94). For the entire cohort, 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS were 83% (95% CI 0.68-0.91), 92% (95% CI 0.78-0.97), and 83% (95% CI 0.71-0.91), respectively. The sole predictor of 5-year OS on UVA was receipt of omentectomy (P=0.09). The predictors of 5-year DSS on UVA were presence of positive peritoneal cytology (P=0.03), number of LN examined (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.21, P=0.05), and number of para-aortic LN examined (HR 1.16 [95% CI 1.01-1.32], P=0.03). The sole independent predictor of DSS was the presence of positive peritoneal cytology (HR 0.03 [95% CI 0.00-0.72], P=0.03). Predictors of five-year RFS on UVA were robotic vs open surgery technique (P=0.06), presence of positive peritoneal cytology (P=0.01), percent myometrial invasion (HR 5.59 [95% CI 0.84-37.46], P=0.08), and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (P=0.05). Conclusions: Five-year survival outcomes were promising in this cohort of women with early-stage USC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and VB; however, this study shows that the predominant pattern of relapse in this population is distant, suggesting the need to optimize systemic therapy. Possible predictors of worse outcomes include positive peritoneal cytology, deep myometrial invasion, and presence of LVSI. Multi-institutional pooled analyses are warranted to confirm our study results

Stereotactic MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Non-metastatic Pancreatic Cancer; Outcomes and Toxicity Analysis for Patients Treated in an Underserved Urban Center

Background: Stereotactic MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) is an emerging technology for treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. Initial results show favorable survival and toxicity. However, data is still sparse overall, and especially in underserved patient populations. The purpose of this study is to review SMART outcomes at our underserved urban academic cancer. Objectives: Stereotactic MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) is an emerging technology for treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. Initial results show favorable survival and toxicity. However, data is still sparse overall, and especially in underserved patient populations. The purpose of this study is to review SMART outcomes at our underserved urban academic cancer. Methods: In this IRB approved retrospective chart review we reviewed 98 patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer, who completed SMART between November 2018-January 2021. All 98 patients were treated with 50 Gy in 5 daily fractions with adaptive technique as deemed appropriate by treating radiation oncologist. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and both acute and late grade 3+ GI toxicity. OS, PFS, locoregional control and distant control were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. The effect of clinical features on OS was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. OS and PFS were calculated from completion of radiation. Grade 3+ GI toxicity probably or definitively related to radiation was recorded. All incidences of GI bleeding, regardless of attribution, were also recorded. Results: Median follow up was 20.9 months from time of diagnosis and 14 months from radiation. 21 (21%) patients were borderline resectable, 42 (43%) locally advanced, 22 (22%) medically inoperable and 13 (13%) resectable. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 86 (88%) patients with a median of 3.5 months of chemotherapy (range 1-12), leaving 11 (12%) patients who did not have systemic chemotherapy. Median overall survival from radiation for the whole group was 15.7 months, and 1-year OS was 58%. There was a statistically significant worsening of overall survival from diagnosis between ECOG 2+ and ECOG 0/1 patients (HR 1.94, 1.05-3.57). 27 (27%) patients went on to have surgical resection with 23 (82%) having R0 resection, and 3 (11%) have an R1 resection. Improved OS was seen in patients with surgical resection (HR 0.06, 0.02-0.23). Acute grade 3+ GI toxicity from radiation was seen in 4 (4%) patients and late toxicity from radiation was seen in 6 (6%) patients. GI bleeding was seen in 16(16%) patients, 10 (62%) of which were on anticoagulation at the time of GI bleed and 5 (19%) of which had surgery. Portal vein complications occurred with 7 (7%) having portal vein thrombosis and 6 (6%) portal vein stenosis. Conclusions: SMART showed durable responses in pancreatic cancer patients with an acceptable toxicity profile. Attention needs to be paid to the moderate incident of GI bleeding, however further work is necessary to determine if bleeding was due to radiation, surgery, or disease progression. Surgical resection as well as performance status of ECOG 0-1 were associated with improved overall survival. Further follow up will be necessary to determine further durability of treatment response and long-term survival in these patients

Evaluating Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes in Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer

Background: Unique challenges surround treatment for residual or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Of the limited treatment options for residual or recurrent HNSCC, salvage surgery is often the best option. However, salvage surgery can result in significant morbidity, affecting both quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes. Few studies have examined QoL outcomes following salvage surgery in the setting of HNSCC. Objectives: To analyze head and neck related quality of life and functional outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer who underwent salvage surgery. Methods: In this IRB approved study, FACT-HN Version 4 was administered pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively to patients undergoing salvage surgery for HNSCC between November 4, 2014 and April 27, 2020. Retrospective cohort analysis was performed on this population with major outcome being postoperative QoL score. Functional outcomes included postoperative tracheostomy and feeding tube status. QoL outcomes were compared with paired t-tests. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with presence of permanent tracheostomy and feeding tube, defined as presence greater than 30 days. Results: Overall, 25 patients undergoing salvage surgery for HNSCC were included in this analysis. Primary tumor sites were larynx/hypopharynx (44.0%), oral cavity (24.0%), oropharynx (20.0%), salivary (4.0%), skin (4.0%), and unknown primary (4.0%). Salvage surgeries consisted of total laryngectomy (36.0%), definitive neck dissection (24.0%), mandibulectomy (16.0%), parotidectomy (8.0%), with total laryngectomy/total glossectomy, radical tonsillectomy, TORS base of tongue excision, and transoral laser laryngeal excision all comprising 4% of cases. Total QoL scores were not significantly different preoperatively to postoperatively (mean 108.7, 95% CI=97.7 to 119.7 vs. 103.8, 95% CI: 93.1 to 114.5; P=0.436, with maximum total score of 148). Patients with lower preoperative Emotional Well-Being (EWB) subscores demonstrated significantly worse EWB subscores postoperatively (postoperative mean: 17.0, 95% CI: 14.5 to 19.4 vs. 21.7, 95% CI: 20.0 to 23.4; P=0.002). Of patients who underwent tracheostomy tube placement, 53.8% (N=7/13) remained tracheostomy dependent long-term (\u3e30 d). Of patients who underwent feeding tube placement, 81.0% (N=17/21) remained feeding tube dependent long-term (\u3e30 d). Tracheostomy and feeding tubes remained in place with median durations of 3.02 months (range 0.16 to 20.55) and 10.13 months (range 0 to 24.89), respectively. All patients with T3/4 disease undergoing salvage surgery required long-term feeding tube (N=6). Conclusions: This study provides important information about quality of life and functional outcomes for patients undergoing salvage surgery for HNSCC. There is a high rate of long-term tracheostomy and feeding tube dependence following salvage surgery. While no difference was found in head and neck related quality of life total score and sub-scores at 6 months postoperatively, general emotional well-being preoperatively was most associated with general emotional well-being postoperatively. This information should be taken into consideration when counseling and managing patients with residual or recurrent HNSCC

Racial Differences in Treatments and Toxicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Thoracic Radiation Therapy

Background: Racial disparities are of particular concern for lung cancer patients given historical differences in surgery rates for African-American lung cancer patients that resulted in lower overall survival and higher recurrence rates compared with rates in White patients. Objectives: The overall objective of this study was to examine racial differences in thoracic radiation therapy (RT) treatments and toxicities in a large cohort of patients from a multi-institutional consortium database of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: A large multi-institutional statewide prospectively collected patient-level database of locally advanced (stage II or III) NSCLC patients who received thoracic RT from March 2012 to November 2019 was analyzed to assess the associations between race and treatment and toxicity variables. Race (White or African-American) was defined by patient self-report or if not available then by the electronic medical record system classification. Race categories other than White or African-American comprised a small minority of patients and were excluded from this analysis. Patient-reported toxicity was determined by validated tools including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Provider-reported toxicity was determined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Uni-variable and multi-variable regression models were then fitted to assess relationships between primary outcomes by race and indicators of high-quality treatment and secondary analysis of symptoms. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated between provider reported toxicity and similar patient reported outcomes for each race category. Results: A total of 1441 patients from 24 institutions with mean age of 68 years (range 38-94) were evaluated; 226 patients were African-American, of whom 61% were treated at three facilities. Race was not significantly associated with RT treatment approach, use of concurrent chemotherapy, or the dose to the planning target volume (PTV) or organs at risk including the heart and lungs. However, there was increased patient-reported general pain in African-American patients (compared with White patients) at several time points including pre-RT (22% (vs 15%), P=0.02) and at the end of RT (30% (vs 17%), P=0.001). African-American patients were significantly less likely to have provider-reported grade 2+ radiation pneumonitis (odds ratio (OR) 0.36, P=0.03), despite similar levels of patient-reported respiratory toxicities such as cough and shortness of breath and even after controlling for known patient and treatment-related factors. Correlation coefficients between provider- and patient-reported toxicities were generally similar across race categories. Conclusions: In this large multi-institutional observational study, we reassuringly found no evidence of differences in radiation treatment or chemotherapy approaches by race, in contrast to historical differences by race in surgical care that led to worse survival and outcomes in minority race patients. However, we did unexpectedly find that African-American race was associated with lower odds of provider-reported grade 2+ radiation pneumonitis despite similar patient-reported toxicities of shortness of breath and cough. There are several possibilities for this finding including that pneumonitis is a multifactorial diagnosis that relies on clinical as well as radiologic information and clinical information alone may be insufficient. The Spearman correlation analysis also revealed stronger correlations between patient- and provider-reported toxicities in White patients compared with African-American patients, particularly for trouble swallowing/esophagitis. These findings together for pneumonitis and esophagitis discouragingly suggest possible under-recognition of symptoms in black patients. Further investigation is now warranted to better understand how these findings impact the care of racially diverse lung cancer patients

Expanding Our Understanding of Adherence: The Role of Health Literacy and Cognitive Function in Adherence and Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer

Background: Health literacy is the degree to which a person has the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic information and services needed to make decisions about their health care. Poor health literacy has been associated with difficulties managing medications, assessing and evaluating health information, completing medical and financial forms, and comparing nutritional information of foods. As such, health literacy is closely related to adherence to medical treatment. Cognitive function contributes to one\u27s health literacy, though also independently contributes to adherence. Patients with head and neck cancers require complex, often multimodal care, and both health literacy and cognitive function have been found to be lower than the general population. However no study has examined the interaction between cognitive function and health literacy within treatment for head and neck cancer and outcomes. Objectives: To examine the role of cognitive function and health literacy in adherence to definitive and adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy and disease-free and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: 149 patients who received either definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and were assessed by psycho-oncology provider before initiating treatment were included. Patients between August 2017 through March 2020 were included. Patients were administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-SF) by the psych-oncologist before starting treatment. Cancer and treatment related variables, including adherence, were obtained via chart review. Adherence was defined as having completed the treatment recommended by the Multi-disciplinary Tumor Board. Results: Patients were predominantly male (78%), white (73%), with an average age of 62 years (SD=9.1). The average years of education was 13.6 years (SD=2.6). The mean health literacy score was 6.3 out of 7 (SD=1.3, range 0-7), indicating reading at 7-8th grade level. The mean cognitive function score was 23.8 out of 30 (SD=3.6, range 10-30, scores less than 26 are indicative of cognitive impairment). Sixteen percent of patients were non-adherent to treatment recommendations and this was not associated with either health literacy or cognitive function (P=0.5 & 0.36, respectively). Lower health literacy was associated with later stage at presentation (P\u3c0.05). Health literacy was not associated with disease-free or overall survival (P=0.66 & 0.11, respectively). However, cognitive function was associated with overall survival (P\u3c0.0001) but not disease-free survival (P=0.22). Conclusions: Psychosocial variables such as health literacy and cognitive function are infrequently considered or studied in head and neck cancer. However, there exists significant evidence that patients with head and neck cancer tend to have higher rates of cognitive impairment and lower health literacy than the general population. Further, literacy and cognitive function are known to contribute to health outcomes in other populations. The current study found that cognitive impairment, but not health literacy, is associated with overall survival, while not being associated with treatment adherence. Further research is needed into the pathways that cognitive function interacts with cancer care and survival. This study highlights the need for assessment of cognitive function in patients with head and neck cancer, as identification and intervention with these patients can aid in survival outcomes and quality of life

Surgery After Neoadjuvant Stereotactic MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer: Multi-institutional Toxicity and Survival Outcomes

Background: Favorable toxicity and survival outcomes after dose escalated stereotactic MR guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) have been recently published for locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are not well understood after ablative radiation therapy, which may temper enthusiasm for offering surgery. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate survival and toxicity in resected pancreas cancer patients after neoadjuvant ablative SMART. Methods: In this IRB approved analysis, we retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive patients with resectable, BR, and LA pancreatic cancer based on NCCN 2.2021 staging criteria who were treated at 2 institutions from 2017-2020 with neoadjuvant SMART 50 Gy in 5 fractions on a 0.35T MR Linac and later underwent definitive surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median follow up was 22.4 months from diagnosis and 17.8 months from last day of RT. Most had BR (55%), otherwise initially resectable (33%) or LA (12%) pancreatic cancer. Median duration of induction chemotherapy was 3.5 (SD 1.6) months with most common regimens being FOLFIRINOX (74%), gemcitabine/abraxane (24%) and FOLFOX (3%). Performance status was ECOG 0, 1, 2 in 16 (48.5%), 12 (36.4%), and 5 (15.2%), respectively. Whipple was performed in 27 (82%) of patients, distal pancreatectomy in 4 (12%), and total pancreatectomy in 2 (6%). The median duration from SMART completion to surgery was 6.9 weeks (4.7-44.1). R0 resections were achieved in 28 (84.8%) of patients with the rest being R1, all in BR patients. Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed of the portal vein (PV) in 8 (24.2%) patients, SMV in 4 (12%), SMA in 1 (3%), and common hepatic artery in 2 (6%). Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed in all LA patients. Median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from diagnosis were 29.6 months, 93.8%, 81.5%, respectively. Median OS from RT was not yet reached; 1-year OS was 90.9%. LRC at 1 and 2 years was 97% and 93%, respectively. Radiation related acute and late grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2 (6%) and 2 (6%) patients. Post-op mortality at 30 and 90 days was seen 2 (6%) and 3 (9%) of patients with 1 death from GI bleed attributed to surgery and 1 death from hepatic ischemia related to PV resection. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that surgery for pancreas cancer after dose escalated 5-fraction SMART is feasible. Further clarification is needed with respect to ideal patient selection and timing for surgery, the safety of arterial versus venous resection/reconstruction, and histopathologic response after delivery of ablative versus non-ablative radiation dose

The Influence of Dosimetric Parameters on Quality of Life for Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Background: Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become a standard treatment option for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are medically inoperable. The influence of radiation dose/volume parameters on quality of life is not known. Our hypothesis is that clinically meaningful declines in quality of life over time will be associated with increased radiation lung dose/volume parameters. Objectives: To investigate clinical toxicity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of stage I NSCLC patients after SBRT as a function of radiation dose/volume parameters. Methods: In this IRB-approved study, 55 stage I NSCLC patients who received SBRT (12 Gy x 4) and completed QOL forms were analyzed. Clinical symptoms and QOL were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months post-SBRT. Clinical toxicity was graded using the common terminology criteria for adverse effects (CTCAE v4.0). Quality of life was followed using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI) instrument. Dosimetric parameters, including the mean lung radiation dose (MLD), and the volume of normal lung receiving \u3e 5, 10, 13 or 20 Gy (V5, V10, V13, and V20) were measured from the radiation treatment plan. Student\u27s t-test and Pearson correlation analyses were used to examine the relationships between radiation lung metrics and clinically meaningful changes in QOL and/or clinical toxicities. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate rates of local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 3 year LC, DFS, and OS were 93%, 65% and 84%, respectively, with 5.5% grade 3 toxicity and no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Clinically meaningful declines in patient reported QOL (FACT-TOI, lung cancer subscale, physical well-being, and/or functional well-being) post-treatment significantly correlated with increased dosimetric parameters, such as V10, V13, and V20. Conclusions: While lung SBRT is associated with excellent LC and minimal clinical toxicity for early stage NSCLC, clinically meaningful declines in QOL significantly correlated with increasing lung dose/volume parameters. This suggests that further improvements in the techniques of lung SBRT have the potential to further enhance patients\u27 QOL following this treatment

Surgery After Neoadjuvant Stereotactic MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer: Multi-institutional Toxicity and Survival Outcomes

Background: Favorable toxicity and survival outcomes after dose escalated stereotactic MR guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) have been recently published for locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are not well understood after ablative radiation therapy, which may temper enthusiasm for offering surgery. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate survival and toxicity in resected pancreas cancer patients after neoadjuvant ablative SMART. Methods: In this IRB approved analysis, we retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive patients with resectable, BR, and LA pancreatic cancer based on NCCN 2.2021 staging criteria who were treated at 2 institutions from 2017-2020 with neoadjuvant SMART 50 Gy in 5 fractions on a 0.35T MR Linac and later underwent definitive surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median follow up was 22.4 months from diagnosis and 17.8 months from last day of RT. Most had BR (55%), otherwise initially resectable (33%) or LA (12%) pancreatic cancer. Median duration of induction chemotherapy was 3.5 (SD 1.6) months with most common regimens being FOLFIRINOX (74%), gemcitabine/abraxane (24%) and FOLFOX (3%). Performance status was ECOG 0, 1, 2 in 16 (48.5%), 12 (36.4%), and 5 (15.2%), respectively. Whipple was performed in 27 (82%) of patients, distal pancreatectomy in 4 (12%), and total pancreatectomy in 2 (6%). The median duration from SMART completion to surgery was 6.9 weeks (4.7-44.1). R0 resections were achieved in 28 (84.8%) of patients with the rest being R1, all in BR patients. Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed of the portal vein (PV) in 8 (24.2%) patients, SMV in 4 (12%), SMA in 1 (3%), and common hepatic artery in 2 (6%). Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed in all LA patients. Median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from diagnosis were 29.6 months, 93.8%, 81.5%, respectively. Median OS from RT was not yet reached; 1-year OS was 90.9%. LRC at 1 and 2 years was 97% and 93%, respectively. Radiation related acute and late grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2 (6%) and 2 (6%) patients. Post-op mortality at 30 and 90 days was seen 2 (6%) and 3 (9%) of patients with 1 death from GI bleed attributed to surgery and 1 death from hepatic ischemia related to PV resection. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that surgery for pancreas cancer after dose escalated 5-fraction SMART is feasible. Further clarification is needed with respect to ideal patient selection and timing for surgery, the safety of arterial versus venous resection/reconstruction, and histopathologic response after delivery of ablative versus non-ablative radiation dose