4,593 research outputs found
Languages of Dot-depth One over Infinite Words
Over finite words, languages of dot-depth one are expressively complete for
alternation-free first-order logic. This fragment is also known as the Boolean
closure of existential first-order logic. Here, the atomic formulas comprise
order, successor, minimum, and maximum predicates. Knast (1983) has shown that
it is decidable whether a language has dot-depth one. We extend Knast's result
to infinite words. In particular, we describe the class of languages definable
in alternation-free first-order logic over infinite words, and we give an
effective characterization of this fragment. This characterization has two
components. The first component is identical to Knast's algebraic property for
finite words and the second component is a topological property, namely being a
Boolean combination of Cantor sets.
As an intermediate step we consider finite and infinite words simultaneously.
We then obtain the results for infinite words as well as for finite words as
special cases. In particular, we give a new proof of Knast's Theorem on
languages of dot-depth one over finite words.Comment: Presented at LICS 201
Logic Meets Algebra: the Case of Regular Languages
The study of finite automata and regular languages is a privileged meeting
point of algebra and logic. Since the work of Buchi, regular languages have
been classified according to their descriptive complexity, i.e. the type of
logical formalism required to define them. The algebraic point of view on
automata is an essential complement of this classification: by providing
alternative, algebraic characterizations for the classes, it often yields the
only opportunity for the design of algorithms that decide expressibility in
some logical fragment.
We survey the existing results relating the expressibility of regular
languages in logical fragments of MSO[S] with algebraic properties of their
minimal automata. In particular, we show that many of the best known results in
this area share the same underlying mechanics and rely on a very strong
relation between logical substitutions and block-products of pseudovarieties of
monoid. We also explain the impact of these connections on circuit complexity
theory.Comment: 37 page
Separating regular languages with two quantifier alternations
We investigate a famous decision problem in automata theory: separation.
Given a class of language C, the separation problem for C takes as input two
regular languages and asks whether there exists a third one which belongs to C,
includes the first one and is disjoint from the second. Typically, obtaining an
algorithm for separation yields a deep understanding of the investigated class
C. This explains why a lot of effort has been devoted to finding algorithms for
the most prominent classes.
Here, we are interested in classes within concatenation hierarchies. Such
hierarchies are built using a generic construction process: one starts from an
initial class called the basis and builds new levels by applying generic
operations. The most famous one, the dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and
Cohen, classifies the languages definable in first-order logic. Moreover, it
was shown by Thomas that it corresponds to the quantifier alternation hierarchy
of first-order logic: each level in the dot-depth corresponds to the languages
that can be defined with a prescribed number of quantifier blocks. Finding
separation algorithms for all levels in this hierarchy is among the most famous
open problems in automata theory.
Our main theorem is generic: we show that separation is decidable for the
level 3/2 of any concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite. Furthermore, in
the special case of the dot-depth, we push this result to the level 5/2. In
logical terms, this solves separation for : first-order sentences
having at most three quantifier blocks starting with an existential one
- …