Flash-memories in Space Applications: Trends and Challenges

Nowadays space applications are provided with a processing power absolutely overcoming the one available just a few years ago. Typical mission-critical space system applications include also the issue of solid-state recorder(s). Flash-memories are nonvolatile, shock-resistant and power-economic, but in turn have different drawbacks. A solid-state recorder for space applications should satisfy many different constraints especially because of the issues related to radiations: proper countermeasures are needed, together with EDAC and testing techniques in order to improve the dependability of the whole system. Different and quite often contrasting dimensions need to be explored during the design of a flash-memory based solid- state recorder. In particular, we shall explore the most important flash-memory design dimensions and trade-offs to tackle during the design of flash-based hard disks for space application

Operating-system support for distributed multimedia

Multimedia applications place new demands upon processors, networks and operating systems. While some network designers, through ATM for example, have considered revolutionary approaches to supporting multimedia, the same cannot be said for operating systems designers. Most work is evolutionary in nature, attempting to identify additional features that can be added to existing systems to support multimedia. Here we describe the Pegasus project's attempt to build an integrated hardware and operating system environment from\ud the ground up specifically targeted towards multimedia

A File System Level Snapshot In Ext4

Snapshot makes a copy of current working system. Creating a snapshot with some processing andoverheads is important to provide the reliable data service during backup. There are two types of snapshottechniques: volume-based approach and system-based approach. The volume-based Logical VolumeManager provides compact space usability, but requires some space to save snapshot and makes systemwith extra overheads. The system-based Snapshot works better than volume based. The file system basedSnapshot does not need reserve space for snapshot. Therefore, the system-based Snapshot is considered agood solution in the computer environment where large-scale space management capability is not thatcritical. However, such snapshot feature is available in Linux kernel 2.2, 2.6 in EXT3 file system. In thispaper, we proposed a system-based snapshot for the ext4 system in Linux kernel 2.6 or higher. The main concept of the system-based snapshot mainly come from old-version system based Snapshot.Keywords: Snapcreate, kernel, Inode, SnapFS