11,648 research outputs found
The Complexity of Simultaneous Geometric Graph Embedding
Given a collection of planar graphs on the same set of
vertices, the simultaneous geometric embedding (with mapping) problem, or
simply -SGE, is to find a set of points in the plane and a bijection
such that the induced straight-line drawings of
under are all plane.
This problem is polynomial-time equivalent to weak rectilinear realizability
of abstract topological graphs, which Kyn\v{c}l (doi:10.1007/s00454-010-9320-x)
proved to be complete for , the existential theory of the
reals. Hence the problem -SGE is polynomial-time equivalent to several other
problems in computational geometry, such as recognizing intersection graphs of
line segments or finding the rectilinear crossing number of a graph.
We give an elementary reduction from the pseudoline stretchability problem to
-SGE, with the property that both numbers and are linear in the
number of pseudolines. This implies not only the -hardness
result, but also a lower bound on the minimum size of a
grid on which any such simultaneous embedding can be drawn. This bound is
tight. Hence there exists such collections of graphs that can be simultaneously
embedded, but every simultaneous drawing requires an exponential number of bits
per coordinates. The best value that can be extracted from Kyn\v{c}l's proof is
only
Relating Graph Thickness to Planar Layers and Bend Complexity
The thickness of a graph with vertices is the minimum number of
planar subgraphs of whose union is . A polyline drawing of in
is a drawing of , where each vertex is mapped to a
point and each edge is mapped to a polygonal chain. Bend and layer complexities
are two important aesthetics of such a drawing. The bend complexity of
is the maximum number of bends per edge in , and the layer complexity
of is the minimum integer such that the set of polygonal chains in
can be partitioned into disjoint sets, where each set corresponds
to a planar polyline drawing. Let be a graph of thickness . By
F\'{a}ry's theorem, if , then can be drawn on a single layer with bend
complexity . A few extensions to higher thickness are known, e.g., if
(resp., ), then can be drawn on layers with bend complexity 2
(resp., ). However, allowing a higher number of layers may reduce the
bend complexity, e.g., complete graphs require layers to be drawn
using 0 bends per edge.
In this paper we present an elegant extension of F\'{a}ry's theorem to draw
graphs of thickness . We first prove that thickness- graphs can be
drawn on layers with bends per edge. We then develop another
technique to draw thickness- graphs on layers with bend complexity,
i.e., , where . Previously, the bend complexity was not known to be sublinear for
. Finally, we show that graphs with linear arboricity can be drawn on
layers with bend complexity .Comment: A preliminary version appeared at the 43rd International Colloquium
on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2016
Simultaneous Orthogonal Planarity
We introduce and study the problem: Given planar
graphs each with maximum degree 4 and the same vertex set, do they admit an
OrthoSEFE, that is, is there an assignment of the vertices to grid points and
of the edges to paths on the grid such that the same edges in distinct graphs
are assigned the same path and such that the assignment induces a planar
orthogonal drawing of each of the graphs?
We show that the problem is NP-complete for even if the shared
graph is a Hamiltonian cycle and has sunflower intersection and for
even if the shared graph consists of a cycle and of isolated vertices. Whereas
the problem is polynomial-time solvable for when the union graph has
maximum degree five and the shared graph is biconnected. Further, when the
shared graph is biconnected and has sunflower intersection, we show that every
positive instance has an OrthoSEFE with at most three bends per edge.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2016
- …