251 research outputs found
The Complexity of Satisfiability for Sub-Boolean Fragments of ALC
The standard reasoning problem, concept satisfiability, in the basic
description logic ALC is PSPACE-complete, and it is EXPTIME-complete in the
presence of unrestricted axioms. Several fragments of ALC, notably logics in
the FL, EL, and DL-Lite family, have an easier satisfiability problem;
sometimes it is even tractable. All these fragments restrict the use of Boolean
operators in one way or another. We look at systematic and more general
restrictions of the Boolean operators and establish the complexity of the
concept satisfiability problem in the presence of axioms. We separate tractable
from intractable cases.Comment: 17 pages, accepted (in short version) to Description Logic Workshop
201
A cookbook for temporal conceptual data modelling with description logic
We design temporal description logics suitable for reasoning about temporal conceptual data models and investigate their computational complexity. Our formalisms are based on DL-Lite logics with three types of concept inclusions (ranging from atomic concept inclusions and disjointness to the full Booleans), as well as cardinality constraints and role inclusions. In the temporal dimension, they capture future and past temporal operators on concepts, flexible and rigid roles, the operators `always' and `some time' on roles, data assertions for particular moments of time and global concept inclusions. The logics are interpreted over the Cartesian products of object domains and the flow of time (Z,<), satisfying the constant domain assumption. We prove that the most expressive of our temporal description logics (which can capture lifespan cardinalities and either qualitative or quantitative evolution constraints) turn out to be undecidable. However, by omitting some of the temporal operators on concepts/roles or by restricting the form of concept inclusions we obtain logics whose complexity ranges between PSpace and NLogSpace. These positive results were obtained by reduction to various clausal fragments of propositional temporal logic, which opens a way to employ propositional or first-order temporal provers for reasoning about temporal data models
Complexity Results and Practical Algorithms for Logics in Knowledge Representation
Description Logics (DLs) are used in knowledge-based systems to represent and
reason about terminological knowledge of the application domain in a
semantically well-defined manner. In this thesis, we establish a number of
novel complexity results and give practical algorithms for expressive DLs that
provide different forms of counting quantifiers.
We show that, in many cases, adding local counting in the form of qualifying
number restrictions to DLs does not increase the complexity of the inference
problems, even if binary coding of numbers in the input is assumed. On the
other hand, we show that adding different forms of global counting restrictions
to a logic may increase the complexity of the inference problems dramatically.
We provide exact complexity results and a practical, tableau based algorithm
for the DL SHIQ, which forms the basis of the highly optimized DL system iFaCT.
Finally, we describe a tableau algorithm for the clique guarded fragment
(CGF), which we hope will serve as the basis for an efficient implementation of
a CGF reasoner.Comment: Ph.D. Thesi
Practical Reasoning for Very Expressive Description Logics
Description Logics (DLs) are a family of knowledge representation formalisms
mainly characterised by constructors to build complex concepts and roles from
atomic ones. Expressive role constructors are important in many applications,
but can be computationally problematical. We present an algorithm that decides
satisfiability of the DL ALC extended with transitive and inverse roles and
functional restrictions with respect to general concept inclusion axioms and
role hierarchies; early experiments indicate that this algorithm is well-suited
for implementation. Additionally, we show that ALC extended with just
transitive and inverse roles is still in PSPACE. We investigate the limits of
decidability for this family of DLs, showing that relaxing the constraints
placed on the kinds of roles used in number restrictions leads to the
undecidability of all inference problems. Finally, we describe a number of
optimisation techniques that are crucial in obtaining implementations of the
decision procedures, which, despite the worst-case complexity of the problem,
exhibit good performance with real-life problems
LTL over Description Logic Axioms
Most of the research on temporalized Description Logics (DLs) has concentrated on the case where temporal operators can occur within DL concept descriptions. In this setting, reasoning usually becomes quite hard if rigid roles, i.e., roles whose interpretation does not change over time, are available. In this paper, we consider the case where temporal operators are allowed to occur only in front of DL axioms (i.e., ABox assertions and general concept inclusion axioms), but not inside of concepts descriptions. As the temporal component, we use linear temporal logic (LTL) and in the DL component we consider the basic DL ALC. We show that reasoning in the presence of rigid roles becomes considerably simpler in this setting
Combining DL-LiteNbool with branching time: a gentle marriage
We study combinations of the description logic DL-Lite_{bool}^N with the branching temporal logics CTL* and CTL. We analyse two types of combinations, both with rigid roles: (i) temporal operators are applied to concepts and to ABox assertions, and (ii) temporal operators are applied to concepts and Boolean combinations of concept inclusions and ABox assertions. For the resulting logics, we present algorithms for the satisfiability problem and (mostly tight) complexity bounds ranging from ExpTime to 3ExpTime
Conservative Extensions and Satisfiability in Fragments of First-Order Logic : Complexity and Expressive Power
In this thesis, we investigate the decidability and computational complexity of (deductive) conservative extensions in expressive fragments of first-order logic, such as two-variable and guarded fragments. Moreover, we also investigate the complexity of (query) conservative extensions in Horn description logics with inverse roles. Aditionally, we investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem in the unary negation fragment of first-order logic extended with regular path expressions. Besides complexity results, we also study the expressive power of relation-changing modal logics. In particular, we provide translations intto hybrid logic and compare their expressive power using appropriate notions of bisimulations
- ā¦