10,272 research outputs found
Computer Science and Game Theory: A Brief Survey
There has been a remarkable increase in work at the interface of computer
science and game theory in the past decade. In this article I survey some of
the main themes of work in the area, with a focus on the work in computer
science. Given the length constraints, I make no attempt at being
comprehensive, especially since other surveys are also available, and a
comprehensive survey book will appear shortly.Comment: To appear; Palgrave Dictionary of Economic
LP-based Covering Games with Low Price of Anarchy
We present a new class of vertex cover and set cover games. The price of
anarchy bounds match the best known constant factor approximation guarantees
for the centralized optimization problems for linear and also for submodular
costs -- in contrast to all previously studied covering games, where the price
of anarchy cannot be bounded by a constant (e.g. [6, 7, 11, 5, 2]). In
particular, we describe a vertex cover game with a price of anarchy of 2. The
rules of the games capture the structure of the linear programming relaxations
of the underlying optimization problems, and our bounds are established by
analyzing these relaxations. Furthermore, for linear costs we exhibit linear
time best response dynamics that converge to these almost optimal Nash
equilibria. These dynamics mimic the classical greedy approximation algorithm
of Bar-Yehuda and Even [3]
Resource Buying Games
In resource buying games a set of players jointly buys a subset of a finite
resource set E (e.g., machines, edges, or nodes in a digraph). The cost of a
resource e depends on the number (or load) of players using e, and has to be
paid completely by the players before it becomes available. Each player i needs
at least one set of a predefined family S_i in 2^E to be available. Thus,
resource buying games can be seen as a variant of congestion games in which the
load-dependent costs of the resources can be shared arbitrarily among the
players. A strategy of player i in resource buying games is a tuple consisting
of one of i's desired configurations S_i together with a payment vector p_i in
R^E_+ indicating how much i is willing to contribute towards the purchase of
the chosen resources. In this paper, we study the existence and computational
complexity of pure Nash equilibria (PNE, for short) of resource buying games.
In contrast to classical congestion games for which equilibria are guaranteed
to exist, the existence of equilibria in resource buying games strongly depends
on the underlying structure of the S_i's and the behavior of the cost
functions. We show that for marginally non-increasing cost functions, matroids
are exactly the right structure to consider, and that resource buying games
with marginally non-decreasing cost functions always admit a PNE
On Existence and Properties of Approximate Pure Nash Equilibria in Bandwidth Allocation Games
In \emph{bandwidth allocation games} (BAGs), the strategy of a player
consists of various demands on different resources. The player's utility is at
most the sum of these demands, provided they are fully satisfied. Every
resource has a limited capacity and if it is exceeded by the total demand, it
has to be split between the players. Since these games generally do not have
pure Nash equilibria, we consider approximate pure Nash equilibria, in which no
player can improve her utility by more than some fixed factor through
unilateral strategy changes. There is a threshold (where
is a parameter that limits the demand of each player on a specific
resource) such that -approximate pure Nash equilibria always exist for
, but not for . We give both
upper and lower bounds on this threshold and show that the
corresponding decision problem is -hard. We also show that the
-approximate price of anarchy for BAGs is . For a restricted
version of the game, where demands of players only differ slightly from each
other (e.g. symmetric games), we show that approximate Nash equilibria can be
reached (and thus also be computed) in polynomial time using the best-response
dynamic. Finally, we show that a broader class of utility-maximization games
(which includes BAGs) converges quickly towards states whose social welfare is
close to the optimum
The Social Medium Selection Game
We consider in this paper competition of content creators in routing their
content through various media. The routing decisions may correspond to the
selection of a social network (e.g. twitter versus facebook or linkedin) or of
a group within a given social network. The utility for a player to send its
content to some medium is given as the difference between the dissemination
utility at this medium and some transmission cost. We model this game as a
congestion game and compute the pure potential of the game. In contrast to the
continuous case, we show that there may be various equilibria. We show that the
potential is M-concave which allows us to characterize the equilibria and to
propose an algorithm for computing it. We then give a learning mechanism which
allow us to give an efficient algorithm to determine an equilibrium. We finally
determine the asymptotic form of the equilibrium and discuss the implications
on the social medium selection problem
Designing Network Protocols for Good Equilibria
Designing and deploying a network protocol determines the rules by which end users interact with each other and with the network. We consider the problem of designing a protocol to optimize the equilibrium behavior of a network with selfish users. We consider network cost-sharing games, where the set of Nash equilibria depends fundamentally on the choice of an edge cost-sharing protocol. Previous research focused on the Shapley protocol, in which the cost of each edge is shared equally among its users. We systematically study the design of optimal cost-sharing protocols for undirected and directed graphs, single-sink and multicommodity networks, and different measures of the inefficiency of equilibria. Our primary technical tool is a precise characterization of the cost-sharing protocols that induce only network games with pure-strategy Nash equilibria. We use this characterization to prove, among other results, that the Shapley protocol is optimal in directed graphs and that simple priority protocols are essentially optimal in undirected graphs
A Game-theoretic Framework for Revenue Sharing in Edge-Cloud Computing System
We introduce a game-theoretic framework to ex- plore revenue sharing in an
Edge-Cloud computing system, in which computing service providers at the edge
of the Internet (edge providers) and computing service providers at the cloud
(cloud providers) co-exist and collectively provide computing resources to
clients (e.g., end users or applications) at the edge. Different from
traditional cloud computing, the providers in an Edge-Cloud system are
independent and self-interested. To achieve high system-level efficiency, the
manager of the system adopts a task distribution mechanism to maximize the
total revenue received from clients and also adopts a revenue sharing mechanism
to split the received revenue among computing servers (and hence service
providers). Under those system-level mechanisms, service providers attempt to
game with the system in order to maximize their own utilities, by strategically
allocating their resources (e.g., computing servers).
Our framework models the competition among the providers in an Edge-Cloud
system as a non-cooperative game. Our simulations and experiments on an
emulation system have shown the existence of Nash equilibrium in such a game.
We find that revenue sharing mechanisms have a significant impact on the
system-level efficiency at Nash equilibria, and surprisingly the revenue
sharing mechanism based directly on actual contributions can result in
significantly worse system efficiency than Shapley value sharing mechanism and
Ortmann proportional sharing mechanism. Our framework provides an effective
economics approach to understanding and designing efficient Edge-Cloud
computing systems
- …