192,912 research outputs found
Examples of long-term and short-term decision-making in the UK, Delaware and Germany – gap-filling exercise in the context of the shareholder v. stakeholder debate and share ownership structure of the company
This paper explores the extent to which the law in the UK, Delaware and Germany
imposes an obligation on directors of solvent public companies to take into account
the long-term consequences of their decisions while establishing the content and scope
of long-termism in these three legal systems. This research draws on the academic
literature and performs a gap-filling exercise by identifying examples of long-term
decision-making in these jurisdictions, as well as examples of decision-making and
conduct that is not long-term in nature. In the gap-filling exercise, case studies are
presented in the context of (i) the contemporary shareholder v. stakeholder debate in
corporate governance scholarship and (ii) the relevance of the share ownership structure
of the company. These two important debates are used as variables to cast light
on the ambit of the notion of long-termism, and the structural differences and similarities
between the corporate governance systems and concepts of long-termism in
the UK, Delaware and Germany
Sustainable development : a model Indonesian SRI co-operative : this research paper is presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of International Development, Massey University, New Zealand
This research report explores how ‘sustainable livelihoods’ have been achieved at a model cooperative
using the ‘System of Rice Intensification’ named SIMPATIK. To conduct the research a
novel template was developed. The framework was required following a review of sustainable
livelihood literature which found deficiencies with the ‘sustainable livelihoods framework’,
particularly its treatment of equity, social capital, culture and agro-ecology which disqualified the
framework as an appropriate approach for the research. Amekawa’s (2011) ‘Integrated Sustainable
Livelihoods Framework’ which synthesises agro-ecology and the sustainable livelihoods framework
is then discussed. Further work is then presented on social capital which this paper argues has a
critical role in facilitating access to livelihood capitals. A discussion of the significance of culture
then follows to underline its importance as a form of livelihood capital. The research then introduces
an operational model that is appropriate to the local cultural, institutional and geographical context to
demonstrate how livelihood capitals are linked to livelihood outcomes, a model I have labelled the
‘Apt-Integrated Sustainable Livelihoods Framework’.
This framework is then informed through field research at the SIMPATIK co-operative. Impact
pathways through ‘synergetic forms of social capital’ and the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) are
shown indeed to lead to sustainable livelihood outcomes for research participants. The ‘sequencing’
of livelihood capitals is seen to be critical and the research culminates in the development of a ‘SRI
Co-operative Template for Sustainable Livelihoods’; a transferable model that shows how SRI can be
promoted as a sustainable livelihood strategy
Focus groups of value concepts of producers: National Report Switzerland
The Organic Revision project was funded by the EU with the aim of supporting the further development of the EU Regulation 2092/91 on organic production. As part of the project focus groups were run in five European countries on value concepts of organic producers and other stakeholders, during 2004-2005. The project aims to provide an overview of values held among organic stakeholders, and of similarities and differences among the various national and private organic standards.
In Switzerland, three group sessions were held with established organic farmers, two groups with newly converted organic farmers, one group involved experts from BIO SUISSE and one group was conducted with students from Agronomy, Environmental Sciences and Geography faculties of Zurich.
The following conclusions were reached: Almost all participants were engaged in organic agriculture based on a certain believe or because they just like organic farming. Not only farmers had strong concerns with regard to the current development. The discussion about the basic values and the over-arching principles of organic agriculture were seen as very positive and a move in the right direction.
The health of the ecosystem were in the discussions several times a fundamental value.
Fair trading conditions were seen for many participants as a core issue. The producers did see the maintenance of their family farm and the farm succession as major issue. Many farmers were against an industrialisation of agriculture and against a too strong commercialisation of their products. Several farmers and several groups mentioned the problem of the lack of solidarity between farmers. Solidarity should get more importance in the future. Several farmers wished that there will be better cooperation between farmers and market actors as well as a better common strategy with a clear concept.
Another issue was a truthful and careful processing, which is also for farmers very relevant. The farmers as well as the experts found that the added value of the production, the ideologic content of the products, and as well as the special intrinsic quality of the products are very important. Furthermore farmers and experts were in favour of “100 % entirely supply and market chains with only organic product, where not only the producers but also the trader and sales staff is convinced of organic agriculture. Many producers found that the communication with costumers, in particular public relation, will be important to survive on a competitive market and must be improved.
A secure livelihood, surviving on he market and the strong workload were for many producers a major issues. Another central discussion point was the overregulation and inspection. Not only the producers but all main actors wished that the standard/rules are more comprehensive and the inspection work less bureaucratic. This issue is highly relevant not only for organic farmers.
Experts saw a potential for an adaptation of the standards. In particular the health of the Ecosystem and the regionality are seen as key topics
Distinctive Imperatives for Mission Driven Teaching in Catholic Business Schools
We contend that there are distinct and socially beneficial perspectives, rooted in the Catholic Intellectual Tradition (CIT) and Catholic Social Teaching (CST), which can help nurture future managers to be more attuned to the societal and ethical impacts resulting from their marketing decisions. In this paper, we briefly review several of these themes and illustrate how such messages can be integrated into the marketing instruction that takes place inside of business schools at Catholic universities
Participatory sanitation marketing approaches for altering hygiene behaviour : a review of Community Health Club and community-led total sanitation
Rethinking Sanitation: Lessons and Innovation for Sustainability and Success in the New Millennium
This report highlights some of the key lessons learned from the past about sustainable sanitation solutions, new thinking emerging from consolidated learning and innovative experimentation on-the-ground, and some of the conditions necessary for success if real improvements in sanitation are to be achieved and sustained in rural and urban areas. Special attention is placed on the shift from supply-led sanitation projects to demand-led and market-oriented projects. The report concludes that with much deeper attention and broadened interest in sanitation, a more realistic view of the complexity, time, resources and effort needed to meet the challenge of large-scale sustainable changes in sanitation at the household level
Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the European Union’s (EU) latest regulatory principles for environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. It explains how some of the EU’s member states are ratifying the EU Commission’s directives on ESG reporting by introducing intelligent, substantive and reflexive regulations.
Design/methodology/approach
– Following a review of EU publications and relevant theoretical underpinnings, this paper reports on the EU member states’ national policies for ESG reporting and disclosures.
Findings
– The EU has recently revised a number of tools and instruments for the reporting of financial and non-financial information, including the EU’s modernisation directive, the EU’s directive on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information, the EU Energy Efficiency Directive, the European pollutant release and transfer register, the EU emission trading scheme, the integrated pollution prevention and control directive, among others.
Practical implications
– Although all member states are transposing these new EU directives, to date, there are no specific requirements in relation to the type of non-financial indicators that can be included in annual reports. Moreover, there is a need for further empirical evidence that analyse how these regulations may (or may not) affect government entities and big corporations.
Social implications
– Several EU countries are integrating reporting frameworks that require the engagement of relevant stakeholders (including shareholders) to foster a constructive environment that may lead to continuous improvements in ESG disclosures.
Originality/value
– EU countries are opting for a mix of voluntary and mandatory measures that improve ESG disclosures in their respective jurisdictions. This contribution indicates that there is scope for national governments to give further guidance to civil society and corporate business to comply with the latest EU developments in ESG reporting. When European entities respond to regulatory pressures, they are also addressing ESG and economic deficits for the benefit of all stakeholders.peer-reviewe
Towards a kansei-based user modeling methodology for eco-design
We propose here to highlight the benefits of building a framework linking Kansei Design (KD), User Centered Design (UCD) and Eco-design, as the correlation between these fields is barely explored in research at the current time. Therefore, we believe Kansei Design could serve the goal of achieving more sustainable products by setting up an accurate understanding of the user in terms of ecological awareness, and consequently enhancing performance in the Eco-design process. In the same way, we will consider the means-end chain approach inspired from marketing research, as it is useful for identifying ecological values, mapping associated functions and defining suitable design solutions. Information gathered will serve as entry data for conducting scenario-based design, and supporting the development of an Eco-friendly User Centered Design methodology (EcoUCD).ANR-ECOUS
- …
