422 research outputs found
Superiority of one-way and realtime quantum machines and new directions
In automata theory, the quantum computation has been widely examined for
finite state machines, known as quantum finite automata (QFAs), and less
attention has been given to the QFAs augmented with counters or stacks.
Moreover, to our knowledge, there is no result related to QFAs having more than
one input head. In this paper, we focus on such generalizations of QFAs whose
input head(s) operate(s) in one-way or realtime mode and present many
superiority of them to their classical counterparts. Furthermore, we propose
some open problems and conjectures in order to investigate the power of
quantumness better. We also give some new results on classical computation.Comment: A revised edition with some correction
New results on classical and quantum counter automata
We show that one-way quantum one-counter automaton with zero-error is more
powerful than its probabilistic counterpart on promise problems. Then, we
obtain a similar separation result between Las Vegas one-way probabilistic
one-counter automaton and one-way deterministic one-counter automaton.
We also obtain new results on classical counter automata regarding language
recognition. It was conjectured that one-way probabilistic one blind-counter
automata cannot recognize Kleene closure of equality language [A. Yakaryilmaz:
Superiority of one-way and realtime quantum machines. RAIRO - Theor. Inf. and
Applic. 46(4): 615-641 (2012)]. We show that this conjecture is false, and also
show several separation results for blind/non-blind counter automata.Comment: 21 page
Quantum computation with devices whose contents are never read
In classical computation, a "write-only memory" (WOM) is little more than an
oxymoron, and the addition of WOM to a (deterministic or probabilistic)
classical computer brings no advantage. We prove that quantum computers that
are augmented with WOM can solve problems that neither a classical computer
with WOM nor a quantum computer without WOM can solve, when all other resource
bounds are equal. We focus on realtime quantum finite automata, and examine the
increase in their power effected by the addition of WOMs with different access
modes and capacities. Some problems that are unsolvable by two-way
probabilistic Turing machines using sublogarithmic amounts of read/write memory
are shown to be solvable by these enhanced automata.Comment: 32 pages, a preliminary version of this work was presented in the 9th
International Conference on Unconventional Computation (UC2010
Implications of quantum automata for contextuality
We construct zero-error quantum finite automata (QFAs) for promise problems
which cannot be solved by bounded-error probabilistic finite automata (PFAs).
Here is a summary of our results:
- There is a promise problem solvable by an exact two-way QFA in exponential
expected time, but not by any bounded-error sublogarithmic space probabilistic
Turing machine (PTM).
- There is a promise problem solvable by an exact two-way QFA in quadratic
expected time, but not by any bounded-error -space PTMs in
polynomial expected time. The same problem can be solvable by a one-way Las
Vegas (or exact two-way) QFA with quantum head in linear (expected) time.
- There is a promise problem solvable by a Las Vegas realtime QFA, but not by
any bounded-error realtime PFA. The same problem can be solvable by an exact
two-way QFA in linear expected time but not by any exact two-way PFA.
- There is a family of promise problems such that each promise problem can be
solvable by a two-state exact realtime QFAs, but, there is no such bound on the
number of states of realtime bounded-error PFAs solving the members this
family.
Our results imply that there exist zero-error quantum computational devices
with a \emph{single qubit} of memory that cannot be simulated by any finite
memory classical computational model. This provides a computational perspective
on results regarding ontological theories of quantum mechanics \cite{Hardy04},
\cite{Montina08}. As a consequence we find that classical automata based
simulation models \cite{Kleinmann11}, \cite{Blasiak13} are not sufficiently
powerful to simulate quantum contextuality. We conclude by highlighting the
interplay between results from automata models and their application to
developing a general framework for quantum contextuality.Comment: 22 page
- …