Toward abstractive multi-document summarization using submodular function-based framework, sentence compression and merging

Automatic multi-document summarization is a process of generating a summary that contains the most important information from multiple documents. In this thesis, we design an automatic multi-document summarization system using different abstraction-based methods and submodularity. Our proposed model considers summarization as a budgeted submodular function maximization problem. The model integrates three important measures of a summary - namely importance, coverage, and non-redundancy, and we design a submodular function for each of them. In addition, we integrate sentence compression and sentence merging. When evaluated on the DUC 2004 data set, our generic summarizer has outperformed the state-of-the-art summarization systems in terms of ROUGE-1 recall and f1-measure. For query-focused summarization, we used the DUC 2007 data set where our system achieves statistically similar results to several well-established methods in terms of the ROUGE-2 measure

Semi-extractive multi-document summarization

In this thesis, I design a Maximum Coverage problem with KnaPsack constraint (MCKP) based model for extractive multi-document summarization. The model integrates three measures to detect important sentences including Coverage, rewards sentences in regards to their representative level of the whole document, Relevance, focuses to select sentences that related to the given query, and Compression, rewards concise sentences. To generate a summary, I apply an efficient and scalable greedy algorithm. The algorithm has a near optimal solution when its scoring functions are monotone non-decreasing and submodular. I use DUC 2007 dataset to evaluate our proposed method. Investigating the results using ROUGE package shows improvement over two closely related works. The experimental results illustrates that integrating compression in the MCKP-based model, applying semantic similarity measures to detect Relevance measure and also defining all scoring functions as a monotone submodular function result in having a better performance in generating a summary

Information overload in structured data

Information overload refers to the difficulty of making decisions caused by too much information. In this dissertation, we address information overload problem in two separate structured domains, namely, graphs and text. Graph kernels have been proposed as an efficient and theoretically sound approach to compute graph similarity. They decompose graphs into certain sub-structures, such as subtrees, or subgraphs. However, existing graph kernels suffer from a few drawbacks. First, the dimension of the feature space associated with the kernel often grows exponentially as the complexity of sub-structures increase. One immediate consequence of this behavior is that small, non-informative, sub-structures occur more frequently and cause information overload. Second, as the number of features increase, we encounter sparsity: only a few informative sub-structures will co-occur in multiple graphs. In the first part of this dissertation, we propose to tackle the above problems by exploiting the dependency relationship among sub-structures. First, we propose a novel framework that learns the latent representations of sub-structures by leveraging recent advancements in deep learning. Second, we propose a general smoothing framework that takes structural similarity into account, inspired by state-of-the-art smoothing techniques used in natural language processing. Both the proposed frameworks are applicable to popular graph kernel families, and achieve significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art graph kernels. In the second part of this dissertation, we tackle information overload in text. We first focus on a popular social news aggregation website, Reddit, and design a submodular recommender system that tailors a personalized frontpage for individual users. Second, we propose a novel submodular framework to summarize videos, where both transcript and comments are available. Third, we demonstrate how to apply filtering techniques to select a small subset of informative features from virtual machine logs in order to predict resource usage

A Graph-Based Approach for the Summarization of Scientific Articles

Automatic text summarization is one of the eminent applications in the field of Natural Language Processing. Text summarization is the process of generating a gist from text documents. The task is to produce a summary which contains important, diverse and coherent information, i.e., a summary should be self-contained. The approaches for text summarization are conventionally extractive. The extractive approaches select a subset of sentences from an input document for a summary. In this thesis, we introduce a novel graph-based extractive summarization approach. With the progressive advancement of research in the various fields of science, the summarization of scientific articles has become an essential requirement for researchers. This is our prime motivation in selecting scientific articles as our dataset. This newly formed dataset contains scientific articles from the PLOS Medicine journal, which is a high impact journal in the field of biomedicine. The summarization of scientific articles is a single-document summarization task. It is a complex task due to various reasons, one of it being, the important information in the scientific article is scattered all over it and another reason being, scientific articles contain numerous redundant information. In our approach, we deal with the three important factors of summarization: importance, non-redundancy and coherence. To deal with these factors, we use graphs as they solve data sparsity problems and are computationally less complex. We employ bipartite graphical representation for the summarization task, exclusively. We represent input documents through a bipartite graph that consists of sentence nodes and entity nodes. This bipartite graph representation contains entity transition information which is beneficial for selecting the relevant sentences for a summary. We use a graph-based ranking algorithm to rank the sentences in a document. The ranks are considered as relevance scores of the sentences which are further used in our approach. Scientific articles contain reasonable amount of redundant information, for example, Introduction and Methodology sections contain similar information regarding the motivation and approach. In our approach, we ensure that the summary contains sentences which are non-redundant. Though the summary should contain important and non-redundant information of the input document, its sentences should be connected to one another such that it becomes coherent, understandable and simple to read. If we do not ensure that a summary is coherent, its sentences may not be properly connected. This leads to an obscure summary. Until now, only few summarization approaches take care of coherence. In our approach, we take care of coherence in two different ways: by using the graph measure and by using the structural information. We employ outdegree as the graph measure and coherence patterns for the structural information, in our approach. We use integer programming as an optimization technique, to select the best subset of sentences for a summary. The sentences are selected on the basis of relevance, diversity and coherence measure. The computation of these measures is tightly integrated and taken care of simultaneously. We use human judgements to evaluate coherence of summaries. We compare ROUGE scores and human judgements of different systems on the PLOS Medicine dataset. Our approach performs considerably better than other systems on this dataset. Also, we apply our approach on the standard DUC 2002 dataset to compare the results with the recent state-of-the-art systems. The results show that our graph-based approach outperforms other systems on DUC 2002. In conclusion, our approach is robust, i.e., it works on both scientific and news articles. Our approach has the further advantage of being semi-supervised

Tune your brown clustering, please

Brown clustering, an unsupervised hierarchical clustering technique based on ngram mutual information, has proven useful in many NLP applications. However, most uses of Brown clustering employ the same default configuration; the appropriateness of this configuration has gone predominantly unexplored. Accordingly, we present information for practitioners on the behaviour of Brown clustering in order to assist hyper-parametre tuning, in the form of a theoretical model of Brown clustering utility. This model is then evaluated empirically in two sequence labelling tasks over two text types. We explore the dynamic between the input corpus size, chosen number of classes, and quality of the resulting clusters, which has an impact for any approach using Brown clustering. In every scenario that we examine, our results reveal that the values most commonly used for the clustering are sub-optimal

Models and algorithms for promoting diverse and fair query results

Ensuring fairness and diversity in search results are two key concerns in compelling search and recommendation applications. This work explicitly studies these two aspects given multiple users\u27 preferences as inputs, in an effort to create a single ranking or top-k result set that satisfies different fairness and diversity criteria. From group fairness standpoint, it adapts demographic parity like group fairness criteria and proposes new models that are suitable for ranking or producing top-k set of results. This dissertation also studies equitable exposure of individual search results in long tail data, a concept related to individual fairness. First, the dissertation focuses on aggregating ranks while achieving proportionate fairness (ensures proportionate representation of every group) for multiple protected groups. Then, the dissertation explores how to minimally modify original users\u27 preferences under plurality voting, aiming to produce top-k result set that satisfies complex fairness constraints. A concept referred to as manipulation by modifications is introduced, which involves making minimal changes to the original user preferences to ensure query satisfaction. This problem is formalized as the margin finding problem. A follow up work studies this problem considering a popular ranked choice voting mechanism, namely, the Instant Run-off Voting or IRV, as the preference aggregation method. From the standpoint of individual fairness, this dissertation studies an exposure concern that top-k set based algorithms exhibit when the underlying data has long tail properties, and designs techniques to make those results equitable. For result diversification, the work studies efficiency opportunities in existing diversification algorithms, and designs a generic access primitive called DivGetBatch() to enable that. The contributions of this dissertation lie in (a) formalizing principal problems and studying them analytically. (b) designing scalable algorithms with theoretical guarantees, and (c) extensive experimental study to evaluate the efficacy and scalability of the designed solutions by comparing them with the state-of-the-art solutions using large-scale datasets