Predictive modeling of PV energy production: How to set up the learning task for a better prediction?

In this paper, we tackle the problem of power prediction of several photovoltaic (PV) plants spread over an extended geographic area and connected to a power grid. The paper is intended to be a comprehensive study of one-day ahead forecast of PV energy production along several dimensions of analysis: i) The consideration of the spatio-temporal autocorrelation, which characterizes geophysical phenomena, to obtain more accurate predictions.ii) The learning setting to be considered, i.e. using simple output prediction for each hour or structured output prediction for each day. iii) The learning algorithms: We compare artificial neural networks, most often used for PV prediction forecast, and regression trees for learning adaptive models. The results obtained on two PV power plant datasets show that: taking into account spatio/temporal autocorrelation is beneficial; the structured output prediction setting significantly outperforms the non-structured output prediction setting; and regression trees provide better models than artificial neural networks

Deep Energy-Based Models for Structured Prediction

We introduce structured prediction energy networks (SPENs), a flexible frame- work for structured prediction. A deep architecture is used to define an energy func- tion over candidate outputs and predictions are produced by gradient-based energy minimization. This deep energy captures dependencies between labels that would lead to intractable graphical models, and allows us to automatically discover discrim- inative features of the structured output. Furthermore, practitioners can explore a wide variety of energy function architectures without having to hand-design predic- tion and learning methods for each model. This is because all of our prediction and learning methods interact with the energy only via the standard interface for deep networks: forward and back-propagation. In a variety of applications, we find that we can obtain better accuracy using approximate minimization of non-convex deep energy functions than baseline models that employ simple energy functions for which exact minimization is tractable