17 research outputs found

    Query-to-Communication Lifting for BPP

    Full text link
    For any nn-bit boolean function ff, we show that the randomized communication complexity of the composed function f∘gnf\circ g^n, where gg is an index gadget, is characterized by the randomized decision tree complexity of ff. In particular, this means that many query complexity separations involving randomized models (e.g., classical vs. quantum) automatically imply analogous separations in communication complexity.Comment: 21 page

    Exponential Separation between Quantum Communication and Logarithm of Approximate Rank

    Get PDF
    Chattopadhyay, Mande and Sherif (ECCC 2018) recently exhibited a total Boolean function, the sink function, that has polynomial approximate rank and polynomial randomized communication complexity. This gives an exponential separation between randomized communication complexity and logarithm of the approximate rank, refuting the log-approximate-rank conjecture. We show that even the quantum communication complexity of the sink function is polynomial, thus also refuting the quantum log-approximate-rank conjecture. Our lower bound is based on the fooling distribution method introduced by Rao and Sinha (ECCC 2015) for the classical case and extended by Anshu, Touchette, Yao and Yu (STOC 2017) for the quantum case. We also give a new proof of the classical lower bound using the fooling distribution method.Comment: The same lower bound has been obtained independently and simultaneously by Anurag Anshu, Naresh Goud Boddu and Dave Touchett

    Exponential separation between quantum communication and logarithm of approximate rank

    Get PDF
    Chattopadhyay, Mande and Sherif (ECCC 2018) recently exhibited a total Boolean function, the sink function, that has polynomial approximate rank and polynomial randomized communication complexity. This gives an exponential separation between randomized communication complexity and logarithm of the approximate rank, refuting the log-approximate-rank conjecture. We show that even the quantum communication complexity of the sink function is polynomial, thus also refuting the quantum log-approximate-rank conjecture. Our lower bound is based on the fooling distribution method introduced by Rao and Sinha (ECCC 2015) for the classical case and extended by Anshu, Touchette, Yao and Yu (STOC 2017) for the quantum case. We also give a new proof of the classical lower bound using the fooling distribution method.</p

    KRW Composition Theorems via Lifting

    Full text link
    One of the major open problems in complexity theory is proving super-logarithmic lower bounds on the depth of circuits (i.e., P⊈NC1\mathbf{P}\not\subseteq\mathbf{NC}^1). Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson (Computational Complexity 5(3/4), 1995) suggested to approach this problem by proving that depth complexity behaves "as expected" with respect to the composition of functions f⋄gf\diamond g. They showed that the validity of this conjecture would imply that P⊈NC1\mathbf{P}\not\subseteq\mathbf{NC}^1. Several works have made progress toward resolving this conjecture by proving special cases. In particular, these works proved the KRW conjecture for every outer function ff, but only for few inner functions gg. Thus, it is an important challenge to prove the KRW conjecture for a wider range of inner functions. In this work, we extend significantly the range of inner functions that can be handled. First, we consider the monotone\textit{monotone} version of the KRW conjecture. We prove it for every monotone inner function gg whose depth complexity can be lower bounded via a query-to-communication lifting theorem. This allows us to handle several new and well-studied functions such as the s-ts\textbf{-}t-connectivity, clique, and generation functions. In order to carry this progress back to the non-monotone\textit{non-monotone} setting, we introduce a new notion of semi-monotone\textit{semi-monotone} composition, which combines the non-monotone complexity of the outer function ff with the monotone complexity of the inner function gg. In this setting, we prove the KRW conjecture for a similar selection of inner functions gg, but only for a specific choice of the outer function ff
    corecore