2,181 research outputs found
Structural completeness in propositional logics of dependence
In this paper we prove that three of the main propositional logics of
dependence (including propositional dependence logic and inquisitive logic),
none of which is structural, are structurally complete with respect to a class
of substitutions under which the logics are closed. We obtain an analogues
result with respect to stable substitutions, for the negative variants of some
well-known intermediate logics, which are intermediate theories that are
closely related to inquisitive logic
A Team Based Variant of CTL
We introduce two variants of computation tree logic CTL based on team
semantics: an asynchronous one and a synchronous one. For both variants we
investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability as well as the
model checking problem. The satisfiability problem is shown to be
EXPTIME-complete. Here it does not matter which of the two semantics are
considered. For model checking we prove a PSPACE-completeness for the
synchronous case, and show P-completeness for the asynchronous case.
Furthermore we prove several interesting fundamental properties of both
semantics.Comment: TIME 2015 conference version, modified title and motiviatio
Propositional Logics of Dependence
In this paper, we study logics of dependence on the propositional level. We
prove that several interesting propositional logics of dependence, including
propositional dependence logic, propositional intuitionistic dependence logic
as well as propositional inquisitive logic, are expressively complete and have
disjunctive or conjunctive normal forms. We provide deduction systems and prove
the completeness theorems for these logics
Propositional logic with short-circuit evaluation: a non-commutative and a commutative variant
Short-circuit evaluation denotes the semantics of propositional connectives
in which the second argument is evaluated only if the first argument does not
suffice to determine the value of the expression. Short-circuit evaluation is
widely used in programming, with sequential conjunction and disjunction as
primitive connectives.
We study the question which logical laws axiomatize short-circuit evaluation
under the following assumptions: compound statements are evaluated from left to
right, each atom (propositional variable) evaluates to either true or false,
and atomic evaluations can cause a side effect. The answer to this question
depends on the kind of atomic side effects that can occur and leads to
different "short-circuit logics". The basic case is FSCL (free short-circuit
logic), which characterizes the setting in which each atomic evaluation can
cause a side effect. We recall some main results and then relate FSCL to MSCL
(memorizing short-circuit logic), where in the evaluation of a compound
statement, the first evaluation result of each atom is memorized. MSCL can be
seen as a sequential variant of propositional logic: atomic evaluations cannot
cause a side effect and the sequential connectives are not commutative. Then we
relate MSCL to SSCL (static short-circuit logic), the variant of propositional
logic that prescribes short-circuit evaluation with commutative sequential
connectives.
We present evaluation trees as an intuitive semantics for short-circuit
evaluation, and simple equational axiomatizations for the short-circuit logics
mentioned that use negation and the sequential connectives only.Comment: 34 pages, 6 tables. Considerable parts of the text below stem from
arXiv:1206.1936, arXiv:1010.3674, and arXiv:1707.05718. Together with
arXiv:1707.05718, this paper subsumes most of arXiv:1010.367
Tool support for reasoning in display calculi
We present a tool for reasoning in and about propositional sequent calculi.
One aim is to support reasoning in calculi that contain a hundred rules or
more, so that even relatively small pen and paper derivations become tedious
and error prone. As an example, we implement the display calculus D.EAK of
dynamic epistemic logic. Second, we provide embeddings of the calculus in the
theorem prover Isabelle for formalising proofs about D.EAK. As a case study we
show that the solution of the muddy children puzzle is derivable for any number
of muddy children. Third, there is a set of meta-tools, that allows us to adapt
the tool for a wide variety of user defined calculi
The Budget-Constrained Functional Dependency
Armstrong's axioms of functional dependency form a well-known logical system
that captures properties of functional dependencies between sets of database
attributes. This article assumes that there are costs associated with
attributes and proposes an extension of Armstrong's system for reasoning about
budget-constrained functional dependencies in such a setting.
The main technical result of this article is the completeness theorem for the
proposed logical system. Although the proposed axioms are obtained by just
adding cost subscript to the original Armstrong's axioms, the proof of the
completeness for the proposed system is significantly more complicated than
that for the Armstrong's system
- …