162,743 research outputs found

    Spanning Trees in Random Satisfiability Problems

    Full text link
    Working with tree graphs is always easier than with loopy ones and spanning trees are the closest tree-like structures to a given graph. We find a correspondence between the solutions of random K-satisfiability problem and those of spanning trees in the associated factor graph. We introduce a modified survey propagation algorithm which returns null edges of the factor graph and helps us to find satisfiable spanning trees. This allows us to study organization of satisfiable spanning trees in the space spanned by spanning trees.Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures, published versio

    Enumeration of spanning trees in a pseudofractal scale-free web

    Full text link
    Spanning trees are an important quantity characterizing the reliability of a network, however, explicitly determining the number of spanning trees in networks is a theoretical challenge. In this paper, we study the number of spanning trees in a small-world scale-free network and obtain the exact expressions. We find that the entropy of spanning trees in the studied network is less than 1, which is in sharp contrast to previous result for the regular lattice with the same average degree, the entropy of which is higher than 1. Thus, the number of spanning trees in the scale-free network is much less than that of the corresponding regular lattice. We present that this difference lies in disparate structure of the two networks. Since scale-free networks are more robust than regular networks under random attack, our result can lead to the counterintuitive conclusion that a network with more spanning trees may be relatively unreliable.Comment: Definitive version accepted for publication in EPL (Europhysics Letters

    Spanning trees in random graphs

    Get PDF
    For each Δ>0\Delta>0, we prove that there exists some C=C(Δ)C=C(\Delta) for which the binomial random graph G(n,Clogn/n)G(n,C\log n/n) almost surely contains a copy of every tree with nn vertices and maximum degree at most Δ\Delta. In doing so, we confirm a conjecture by Kahn.Comment: 71 pages, 31 figures, version accepted for publication in Advances in Mathematic

    Counting spanning trees in self-similar networks by evaluating determinants

    Full text link
    Spanning trees are relevant to various aspects of networks. Generally, the number of spanning trees in a network can be obtained by computing a related determinant of the Laplacian matrix of the network. However, for a large generic network, evaluating the relevant determinant is computationally intractable. In this paper, we develop a fairly generic technique for computing determinants corresponding to self-similar networks, thereby providing a method to determine the numbers of spanning trees in networks exhibiting self-similarity. We describe the computation process with a family of networks, called (x,y)(x,y)-flowers, which display rich behavior as observed in a large variety of real systems. The enumeration of spanning trees is based on the relationship between the determinants of submatrices of the Laplacian matrix corresponding to the (x,y)(x,y)-flowers at different generations and is devoid of the direct laborious computation of determinants. Using the proposed method, we derive analytically the exact number of spanning trees in the (x,y)(x,y)-flowers, on the basis of which we also obtain the entropies of the spanning trees in these networks. Moreover, to illustrate the universality of our technique, we apply it to some other self-similar networks with distinct degree distributions, and obtain explicit solutions to the numbers of spanning trees and their entropies. Finally, we compare our results for networks with the same average degree but different structural properties, such as degree distribution and fractal dimension, and uncover the effect of these topological features on the number of spanning trees.Comment: Definitive version published in Journal of Mathematical Physic

    Spanning rigid subgraph packing and sparse subgraph covering

    Full text link
    Rigidity, arising in discrete geometry, is the property of a structure that does not flex. Laman provides a combinatorial characterization of rigid graphs in the Euclidean plane, and thus rigid graphs in the Euclidean plane have applications in graph theory. We discover a sufficient partition condition of packing spanning rigid subgraphs and spanning trees. As a corollary, we show that a simple graph GG contains a packing of kk spanning rigid subgraphs and ll spanning trees if GG is (4k+2l)(4k+2l)-edge-connected, and GZG-Z is essentially (6k+2l2kZ)(6k+2l - 2k|Z|)-edge-connected for every ZV(G)Z\subset V(G). Thus every (4k+2l)(4k+2l)-connected and essentially (6k+2l)(6k+2l)-connected graph GG contains a packing of kk spanning rigid subgraphs and ll spanning trees. Utilizing this, we show that every 66-connected and essentially 88-connected graph GG contains a spanning tree TT such that GE(T)G-E(T) is 22-connected. These improve some previous results. Sparse subgraph covering problems are also studied.Comment: 12 page
    corecore