73 research outputs found
Some results on the comaximal ideal graph of a commutative ring
The rings considered in this article are commutative with identity which admit at least two maximal ideals. Let be a ring such that admits at least two maximal ideals. Recall from Ye and Wu (J. Algebra Appl. 11(6): 1250114, 2012) that the comaximal ideal graph of , denoted by is an undirected simple graph whose vertex set is the set of all proper ideals of such that , where is the Jacobson radical of and distinct vertices , are joined by an edge in if and only if . In Section 2 of this article, we classify rings such that is planar. In Section 3 of this article, we classify rings such that is a split graph. In Section 4 of this article, we classify rings such that is complemented and moreover, we determine the -vertices of
Generalized Irreducible Divisor Graphs
In 1988, I. Beck introduced the notion of a zero-divisor graph of a
commutative rings with . There have been several generalizations in recent
years. In particular, in 2007 J. Coykendall and J. Maney developed the
irreducible divisor graph. Much work has been done on generalized
factorization, especially -factorization. The goal of this paper is to
synthesize the notions of -factorization and irreducible divisor graphs
in domains. We will define a -irreducible divisor graph for non-zero
non-unit elements of a domain. We show that by studying -irreducible
divisor graphs, we find equivalent characterizations of several finite
-factorization properties.Comment: 17 pages, 2 figures, to appear in Communications in Algebr
What does a group algebra of a free group know about the group?
We describe solutions to the problem of elementary classification in the
class of group algebras of free groups. We will show that unlike free groups,
two group algebras of free groups over infinite fields are elementarily
equivalent if and only if the groups are isomorphic and the fields are
equivalent in the weak second order logic. We will show that the set of all
free bases of a free group is 0-definable in the group algebra when
is an infinite field, the set of geodesics is definable, and many geometric
properties of are definable in . Therefore knows some very
important information about . We will show that similar results hold for
group algebras of limit groups.Comment: Published, Available for free at
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007218300174?dgcid=STMJ_73515_AUTH_SERV_PPUB_V38
arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1509.0411
- …
