An Erd{\H o}s-Ko-Rado theorem for permutations with fixed number of cycles

Let $S_{n}$ denote the set of permutations of $[n]=\{1,2,\dots, n\}$. For a positive integer $k$, define $S_{n,k}$ to be the set of all permutations of $[n]$ with exactly $k$ disjoint cycles, i.e., $$S_{n,k} = \{\pi \in S_{n}: \pi = c_{1}c_{2} \cdots c_{k}\},$$ where $c_1,c_2,\dots ,c_k$ are disjoint cycles. The size of $S_{n,k}$ is given by $\left [ \begin{matrix}n\\ k \end{matrix}\right]=(-1)^{n-k}s(n,k)$, where $s(n,k)$ is the Stirling number of the first kind. A family $\mathcal{A} \subseteq S_{n,k}$ is said to be $t$-{\em intersecting} if any two elements of $\mathcal{A}$ have at least $t$ common cycles. In this paper, we show that, given any positive integers $k,t$ with $k\geq t+1$, there exists an integer $n_0=n_0(k,t)$, such that for all $n\geq n_0$, if $\mathcal{A} \subseteq S_{n,k}$ is $t$-intersecting, then $$|\mathcal{A}| \le \left [ \begin{matrix}n-t\\ k-t \end{matrix}\right],$$ with equality if and only if $\mathcal{A}$ is the stabiliser of $t$ fixed points.Comment: 8 page

An Analogue of the Hilton-Milner Theorem for weak compositions

Let $\mathbb N_0$ be the set of non-negative integers, and let $P(n,l)$ denote the set of all weak compositions of $n$ with $l$ parts, i.e., $P(n,l)=\{ (x_1,x_2,\dots, x_l)\in\mathbb N_0^l\ :\ x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_l=n\}$. For any element $\mathbf u=(u_1,u_2,\dots, u_l)\in P(n,l)$, denote its $i$th-coordinate by $\mathbf u(i)$, i.e., $\mathbf u(i)=u_i$. A family $\mathcal A\subseteq P(n,l)$ is said to be $t$-intersecting if $\vert \{ i \ :\ \mathbf u(i)=\mathbf v(i)\} \vert\geq t$ for all $\mathbf u,\mathbf v\in \mathcal A$. A family $\mathcal A\subseteq P(n,l)$ is said to be trivially $t$-intersecting if there is a $t$-set $T$ of $\{1,2,\dots,l\}$ and elements $y_s\in \mathbb N_0$ ($s\in T$) such that $\mathcal{A}= \{\mathbf u\in P(n,l)\ :\ \mathbf u(j)=y_j\ {\rm for all}\ j\in T\}$. We prove that given any positive integers $l,t$ with $l\geq 2t+3$, there exists a constant $n_0(l,t)$ depending only on $l$ and $t$, such that for all $n\geq n_0(l,t)$, if $\mathcal{A} \subseteq P(n,l)$ is non-trivially $t$-intersecting then \begin{equation} \vert \mathcal{A} \vert\leq {n+l-t-1 \choose l-t-1}-{n-1 \choose l-t-1}+t.\notag \end{equation} Moreover, equality holds if and only if there is a $t$-set $T$ of $\{1,2,\dots,l\}$ such that \begin{equation} \mathcal A=\bigcup_{s\in \{1,2,\dots, l\}\setminus T} \mathcal A_s\cup \left\{ \mathbf q_i\ :\ i\in T \right\},\notag \end{equation} where \begin{align} \mathcal{A}_s & =\{\mathbf u\in P(n,l)\ :\ \mathbf u(j)=0\ {\rm for all}\ j\in T\ {\rm and}\ \mathbf u(s)=0\}\notag \end{align} and $\mathbf q_i\in P(n,l)$ with $\mathbf q_i(j)=0$ for all $j\in \{1,2,\dots, l\}\setminus \{i\}$ and $\mathbf q_i(i)=n$.Comment: 19 page