17,004 research outputs found
Incremental Cardinality Constraints for MaxSAT
Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) is an optimization variant of the Boolean
Satisfiability (SAT) problem. In general, MaxSAT algorithms perform a
succession of SAT solver calls to reach an optimum solution making extensive
use of cardinality constraints. Many of these algorithms are non-incremental in
nature, i.e. at each iteration the formula is rebuilt and no knowledge is
reused from one iteration to another. In this paper, we exploit the knowledge
acquired across iterations using novel schemes to use cardinality constraints
in an incremental fashion. We integrate these schemes with several MaxSAT
algorithms. Our experimental results show a significant performance boost for
these algo- rithms as compared to their non-incremental counterparts. These
results suggest that incremental cardinality constraints could be beneficial
for other constraint solving domains.Comment: 18 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Final version published in Principles
and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP) 201
Tarmo: A Framework for Parallelized Bounded Model Checking
This paper investigates approaches to parallelizing Bounded Model Checking
(BMC) for shared memory environments as well as for clusters of workstations.
We present a generic framework for parallelized BMC named Tarmo. Our framework
can be used with any incremental SAT encoding for BMC but for the results in
this paper we use only the current state-of-the-art encoding for full PLTL.
Using this encoding allows us to check both safety and liveness properties,
contrary to an earlier work on distributing BMC that is limited to safety
properties only.
Despite our focus on BMC after it has been translated to SAT, existing
distributed SAT solvers are not well suited for our application. This is
because solving a BMC problem is not solving a set of independent SAT instances
but rather involves solving multiple related SAT instances, encoded
incrementally, where the satisfiability of each instance corresponds to the
existence of a counterexample of a specific length. Our framework includes a
generic architecture for a shared clause database that allows easy clause
sharing between SAT solver threads solving various such instances.
We present extensive experimental results obtained with multiple variants of
our Tarmo implementation. Our shared memory variants have a significantly
better performance than conventional single threaded approaches, which is a
result that many users can benefit from as multi-core and multi-processor
technology is widely available. Furthermore we demonstrate that our framework
can be deployed in a typical cluster of workstations, where several multi-core
machines are connected by a network
On the Hardness of Partially Dynamic Graph Problems and Connections to Diameter
Conditional lower bounds for dynamic graph problems has received a great deal
of attention in recent years. While many results are now known for the
fully-dynamic case and such bounds often imply worst-case bounds for the
partially dynamic setting, it seems much more difficult to prove amortized
bounds for incremental and decremental algorithms. In this paper we consider
partially dynamic versions of three classic problems in graph theory. Based on
popular conjectures we show that:
-- No algorithm with amortized update time exists for
incremental or decremental maximum cardinality bipartite matching. This
significantly improves on the bound for sparse graphs
of Henzinger et al. [STOC'15] and bound of Kopelowitz,
Pettie and Porat. Our linear bound also appears more natural. In addition, the
result we present separates the node-addition model from the edge insertion
model, as an algorithm with total update time exists for the
former by Bosek et al. [FOCS'14].
-- No algorithm with amortized update time exists for
incremental or decremental maximum flow in directed and weighted sparse graphs.
No such lower bound was known for partially dynamic maximum flow previously.
Furthermore no algorithm with amortized update time
exists for directed and unweighted graphs or undirected and weighted graphs.
-- No algorithm with amortized update time exists
for incremental or decremental -approximating the diameter
of an unweighted graph. We also show a slightly stronger bound if node
additions are allowed. [...]Comment: To appear at ICALP'16. Abstract truncated to fit arXiv limit
Exploiting Resolution-based Representations for MaxSAT Solving
Most recent MaxSAT algorithms rely on a succession of calls to a SAT solver
in order to find an optimal solution. In particular, several algorithms take
advantage of the ability of SAT solvers to identify unsatisfiable subformulas.
Usually, these MaxSAT algorithms perform better when small unsatisfiable
subformulas are found early. However, this is not the case in many problem
instances, since the whole formula is given to the SAT solver in each call. In
this paper, we propose to partition the MaxSAT formula using a resolution-based
graph representation. Partitions are then iteratively joined by using a
proximity measure extracted from the graph representation of the formula. The
algorithm ends when only one partition remains and the optimal solution is
found. Experimental results show that this new approach further enhances a
state of the art MaxSAT solver to optimally solve a larger set of industrial
problem instances
- âŠ