An Investigation of Soft Proof to Print Agreement under Bright Surround

Color quality is a vital concern in the printing industry. The ability of an LCD monitor to accurately and consistently predict the color of a printed work is often in doubt. According to Chung (2005), color reproduction technology is different for soft proofing and hard proofing which could lead a layman to believe that the two technologies may not produce the same result. Nevertheless, it is still possible for both reproduction technologies to achieve a metameric match which gives the same perceived color sensation between display and print. ISO/CD 14681 provides guidelines for creating the conditions required to perform soft proofing. This standard builds on ISO 12646 requirements for monitors and introduces a new softproofing environment (lightbooth with integrated monitor) to better meet the needs of industrial users. The ISO 14681 integrated viewing environment removes one important obstacle to achieving print to softproof match, i.e., the problem of simultaneous color contrast inherent in using a dim monitor surround with a bright paper viewing condition for soft proofing. Thus, the first objective of this research was to assess print to softproof visual match in the ISO 14681 integrated viewing environment. Nevertheless, even in this environment, inconsistency between paper white and monitor white remains as the next major obstacle to achieving consistent print to softproof match. Thus, a second objective of this research is to develop a methodology for matching the monitor\u27s white point to the white point of the paper viewed in an ISO 14681 integrated viewing environment. The methodology for fulfilling these objectives began with the creation of the hardware/software environment required to support experimentation. This environment consisted of a 24-inch EIZO CG242W display conforming to ISO 12646 and an integrated viewing environment conforming to the P2 specification in ISO 3664:2009. Two ISO 12647-2 conformed press sheets were prepared and became the reference for the experiment. The researcher next developed a methodology for matching the monitor white point to the white point of the paper under the P2 viewing condition. Finally, a panel of observers was used to compare print to softproof match for four display conditions in a paired comparison experiment. The results of the experiment were highly encouraging. The mismatch between monitor and paper white points, as measured by the sum of the differences in R, G, and B counts between the monitor and the paper, was reduced by nearly 90%. In addition, the paired comparison experiment demonstrated that the use of a custom monitor white point and optimized monitor gamma outperformed the use of standard D65 and D50 white points with the same optimized gamma at a .05 level of significance

Print-to-Proof Visual Match Using Papers with Optical Brightening Agents

Optical Brightening Agents (OBAs) are chemicals added to paper pulp whose purpose is to brighten the white point of the paper. Adding OBAs results in a brighter white, increased tonal range, and more chromatic colors. However, adding OBAs can also create problems in visual print-to-proof match where proofing substrates do not contain OBAs. Visual print-to-proof match is the final judge of conformance in a print business. When printing and proofing in conformance to standards and specifications on non-OBA papers, there is visual match between the print and the proof. Printing on OBA loaded papers causes two main problems: (1) difficulty in achieving conformance to printing standards and (2) visual print-to-proof mismatch. To solve the above problems, this research begins by adopting the new M1 measurement condition and the revised ISO 3664:2009 viewing conditions. It then assumes that the print on OBA loaded paper is the anchor and the proof must be color managed to match the print using these new measurement and viewing conditions. In order to test the proposed solution, the researcher prepared a series of prints and proofs that (1) reproduced the proof-to-print match traditionally achieved on non-OBA loaded printing papers (the anchor pair), (2) reproduced the proof-to-print mismatch on OBA loaded printing papers (the problem pair), ix and (3) tested the color managed approach to solving the problem described above (the solution pair). Finally, these pairs were evaluated by a panel of observers in a paired comparison experiment under the revised ISO 3664:2009 viewing conditions. The results of the paired comparison experiment first demonstrated that the researcher could reproduced both a proof-to-print match on non-OBA loaded papers and a proof-to-print mismatch on OBA loaded papers. In addition, the solution pair was demonstrated to be preferred to all other pairs at the .05 level of significance. Finally CIELAB plots of the problem pair and the solution pair under M1 conditions supported the results of the pair comparison experiment. Under M1 conditions the proof-to-print mismatch (difference in CIELAB values) for the problem pair was shown to be approximately twice as large as the proof-to-print mismatch for the solution pair. Based on the results of this research, the proposed solution was shown to be a promising approach for solving the industry wide problem of print-to-proof mismatch when printers print on OBA loaded papers

A Paradigm for color gamut mapping of pictorial images

In this thesis, a paradigm was generated for color gamut mapping of pictorial images. This involved the development and testing of: 1.) a hue-corrected version of the CIELAB color space, 2.) an image-dependent sigmoidal-lightness-rescaling process, 3.) an image-gamut- based chromatic-compression process, and 4.) a gamut-expansion process. This gamut-mapping paradigm was tested against some gamut-mapping strategies published in the literature. Reproductions generated by gamut mapping in a hue-corrected CIELAB color space more accurately preserved the perceived hue of the original scenes compared to reproductions generated using the CIELAB color space. The results of three gamut-mapping experiments showed that the contrast-preserving nature of the sigmoidal-lightness-remapping strategy generated gamut-mapped reproductions that were better matches to the originals than reproductions generated using linear-lightness-compression functions. In addition, chromatic-scaling functions that compressed colors at a higher rate near the gamut surface and less near the achromatic axis produced better matches to the originals than algorithms that performed linear chroma compression throughout color space. A constrained gamut-expansion process, similar to the inverse of the best gamut-compression process found in this experiment, produced reproductions preferred over an expansion process utilizing unconstrained linear expansion

The LLAB model for quantifying colour appearance

A reliable colour appearance model is desired by industry to achieve high colour fidelity between images produced using a range of different imaging devices. The aim of this study was to derive a reliable colour appearance model capable of predicting the change of perceived attributes of colour appearance under a wide range of media/viewing conditions. The research was divided into three parts: characterising imaging devices, conducting a psychophysical experiment, and developing a colour appearance model. Various imaging devices were characterised including a graphic art scanner, a Cromalin proofing system, an IRIS ink jet printer, and a Barco Calibrator. For the former three devices, each colour is described by four primaries: cyan (C), magenta (M), yellow (Y), and black (K). Three set of characterisation samples (120 and 31 black printer, and cube data sets) were produced and measured for deriving and testing the printing characterisation models. Four black printer algorithms (BPA), were derived. Each included both forward and reverse processes. A 2nd BPA printing model taking into account additivity failure, grey component replacement (GCR) algorithm gave the most accurate prediction to the characterisation data set than the other BPA models. The PLCC (Piecewise Linear interpolation assuming Constant Chromaticity coordinates) monitor model was also implemented to characterise the Barco monitor. The psychophysical experiment was conducted to compare Cromalin hardcopy images viewed in a viewing cabinet and softcopy images presented on a monitor under a wide range of illuminants (white points) including: D93, D65, D50 and A. Two scaling methods: category judgement and paired comparison, were employed by viewing a pair of images. Three classes of colour models were evaluated: uniform colour spaces, colour appearance models and chromatic adaptation transforms. Six images were selected and processed via each colour model. The results indicated that the BFD chromatic transform gave the most accurate predictions of the visual results. Finally, a colour appearance model, LLAB, was developed. It is a combination of the BFD chromatic transform and a modified version of CIELAB uniform colour space to fit the LUTCRI Colour Appearance Data previously accumulated. The form of the LLAB model is much simpler and its performance is more precise to fit experimental data than those of the other models