940 research outputs found
Algebraic Hardness Versus Randomness in Low Characteristic
We show that lower bounds for explicit constant-variate polynomials over fields of characteristic p > 0 are sufficient to derandomize polynomial identity testing over fields of characteristic p. In this setting, existing work on hardness-randomness tradeoffs for polynomial identity testing requires either the characteristic to be sufficiently large or the notion of hardness to be stronger than the standard syntactic notion of hardness used in algebraic complexity. Our results make no restriction on the characteristic of the field and use standard notions of hardness.
We do this by combining the Kabanets-Impagliazzo generator with a white-box procedure to take p-th roots of circuits computing a p-th power over fields of characteristic p. When the number of variables appearing in the circuit is bounded by some constant, this procedure turns out to be efficient, which allows us to bypass difficulties related to factoring circuits in characteristic p.
We also combine the Kabanets-Impagliazzo generator with recent "bootstrapping" results in polynomial identity testing to show that a sufficiently-hard family of explicit constant-variate polynomials yields a near-complete derandomization of polynomial identity testing. This result holds over fields of both zero and positive characteristic and complements a recent work of Guo, Kumar, Saptharishi, and Solomon, who obtained a slightly stronger statement over fields of characteristic zero
Spectral Simplicity of Apparent Complexity, Part I: The Nondiagonalizable Metadynamics of Prediction
Virtually all questions that one can ask about the behavioral and structural
complexity of a stochastic process reduce to a linear algebraic framing of a
time evolution governed by an appropriate hidden-Markov process generator. Each
type of question---correlation, predictability, predictive cost, observer
synchronization, and the like---induces a distinct generator class. Answers are
then functions of the class-appropriate transition dynamic. Unfortunately,
these dynamics are generically nonnormal, nondiagonalizable, singular, and so
on. Tractably analyzing these dynamics relies on adapting the recently
introduced meromorphic functional calculus, which specifies the spectral
decomposition of functions of nondiagonalizable linear operators, even when the
function poles and zeros coincide with the operator's spectrum. Along the way,
we establish special properties of the projection operators that demonstrate
how they capture the organization of subprocesses within a complex system.
Circumventing the spurious infinities of alternative calculi, this leads in the
sequel, Part II, to the first closed-form expressions for complexity measures,
couched either in terms of the Drazin inverse (negative-one power of a singular
operator) or the eigenvalues and projection operators of the appropriate
transition dynamic.Comment: 24 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables; current version always at
http://csc.ucdavis.edu/~cmg/compmech/pubs/sdscpt1.ht
Towards Optimal Depth-Reductions for Algebraic Formulas
Classical results of Brent, Kuck and Maruyama (IEEE Trans. Computers 1973) and Brent (JACM 1974) show that any algebraic formula of size s can be converted to one of depth O(log s) with only a polynomial blow-up in size. In this paper, we consider a fine-grained version of this result depending on the degree of the polynomial computed by the algebraic formula.
Given a homogeneous algebraic formula of size s computing a polynomial P of degree d, we show that P can also be computed by an (unbounded fan-in) algebraic formula of depth O(log d) and size poly(s). Our proof shows that this result also holds in the highly restricted setting of monotone, non-commutative algebraic formulas.
This improves on previous results in the regime when d is small (i.e., d = s^o(1)). In particular, for the setting of d = O(log s), along with a result of Raz (STOC 2010, JACM 2013), our result implies the same depth reduction even for inhomogeneous formulas. This is particularly interesting in light of recent algebraic formula lower bounds, which work precisely in this "low-degree" and "low-depth" setting.
We also show that these results cannot be improved in the monotone setting, even for commutative formulas
A Quadratic Size-Hierarchy Theorem for Small-Depth Multilinear Formulas
We show explicit separations between the expressive powers of multilinear formulas of small-depth and all polynomial sizes.
Formally, for any s = s(n) = n^{O(1)} and any delta>0, we construct explicit families of multilinear polynomials P_n in F[x_1,...,x_n] that have multilinear formulas of size s and depth three but no multilinear formulas of size s^{1/2-delta} and depth o(log n/log log n).
As far as we know, this is the first such result for an algebraic model of computation.
Our proof can be viewed as a derandomization of a lower bound technique of Raz (JACM 2009) using epsilon-biased spaces
From Small Space to Small Width in Resolution
In 2003, Atserias and Dalmau resolved a major open question about the
resolution proof system by establishing that the space complexity of CNF
formulas is always an upper bound on the width needed to refute them. Their
proof is beautiful but somewhat mysterious in that it relies heavily on tools
from finite model theory. We give an alternative, completely elementary proof
that works by simple syntactic manipulations of resolution refutations. As a
by-product, we develop a "black-box" technique for proving space lower bounds
via a "static" complexity measure that works against any resolution
refutation---previous techniques have been inherently adaptive. We conclude by
showing that the related question for polynomial calculus (i.e., whether space
is an upper bound on degree) seems unlikely to be resolvable by similar
methods
- …