46 research outputs found

    Faster tuple lattice sieving using spherical locality-sensitive filters

    Get PDF
    To overcome the large memory requirement of classical lattice sieving algorithms for solving hard lattice problems, Bai-Laarhoven-Stehl\'{e} [ANTS 2016] studied tuple lattice sieving, where tuples instead of pairs of lattice vectors are combined to form shorter vectors. Herold-Kirshanova [PKC 2017] recently improved upon their results for arbitrary tuple sizes, for example showing that a triple sieve can solve the shortest vector problem (SVP) in dimension dd in time 20.3717d+o(d)2^{0.3717d + o(d)}, using a technique similar to locality-sensitive hashing for finding nearest neighbors. In this work, we generalize the spherical locality-sensitive filters of Becker-Ducas-Gama-Laarhoven [SODA 2016] to obtain space-time tradeoffs for near neighbor searching on dense data sets, and we apply these techniques to tuple lattice sieving to obtain even better time complexities. For instance, our triple sieve heuristically solves SVP in time 20.3588d+o(d)2^{0.3588d + o(d)}. For practical sieves based on Micciancio-Voulgaris' GaussSieve [SODA 2010], this shows that a triple sieve uses less space and less time than the current best near-linear space double sieve.Comment: 12 pages + references, 2 figures. Subsumed/merged into Cryptology ePrint Archive 2017/228, available at https://ia.cr/2017/122

    Tradeoffs for nearest neighbors on the sphere

    Get PDF
    We consider tradeoffs between the query and update complexities for the (approximate) nearest neighbor problem on the sphere, extending the recent spherical filters to sparse regimes and generalizing the scheme and analysis to account for different tradeoffs. In a nutshell, for the sparse regime the tradeoff between the query complexity nρqn^{\rho_q} and update complexity nρun^{\rho_u} for data sets of size nn is given by the following equation in terms of the approximation factor cc and the exponents ρq\rho_q and ρu\rho_u: c2ρq+(c21)ρu=2c21.c^2\sqrt{\rho_q}+(c^2-1)\sqrt{\rho_u}=\sqrt{2c^2-1}. For small c=1+ϵc=1+\epsilon, minimizing the time for updates leads to a linear space complexity at the cost of a query time complexity n14ϵ2n^{1-4\epsilon^2}. Balancing the query and update costs leads to optimal complexities n1/(2c21)n^{1/(2c^2-1)}, matching bounds from [Andoni-Razenshteyn, 2015] and [Dubiner, IEEE-TIT'10] and matching the asymptotic complexities of [Andoni-Razenshteyn, STOC'15] and [Andoni-Indyk-Laarhoven-Razenshteyn-Schmidt, NIPS'15]. A subpolynomial query time complexity no(1)n^{o(1)} can be achieved at the cost of a space complexity of the order n1/(4ϵ2)n^{1/(4\epsilon^2)}, matching the bound nΩ(1/ϵ2)n^{\Omega(1/\epsilon^2)} of [Andoni-Indyk-Patrascu, FOCS'06] and [Panigrahy-Talwar-Wieder, FOCS'10] and improving upon results of [Indyk-Motwani, STOC'98] and [Kushilevitz-Ostrovsky-Rabani, STOC'98]. For large cc, minimizing the update complexity results in a query complexity of n2/c2+O(1/c4)n^{2/c^2+O(1/c^4)}, improving upon the related exponent for large cc of [Kapralov, PODS'15] by a factor 22, and matching the bound nΩ(1/c2)n^{\Omega(1/c^2)} of [Panigrahy-Talwar-Wieder, FOCS'08]. Balancing the costs leads to optimal complexities n1/(2c21)n^{1/(2c^2-1)}, while a minimum query time complexity can be achieved with update complexity n2/c2+O(1/c4)n^{2/c^2+O(1/c^4)}, improving upon the previous best exponents of Kapralov by a factor 22.Comment: 16 pages, 1 table, 2 figures. Mostly subsumed by arXiv:1608.03580 [cs.DS] (along with arXiv:1605.02701 [cs.DS]

    Approximate Voronoi cells for lattices, revisited

    Get PDF
    We revisit the approximate Voronoi cells approach for solving the closest vector problem with preprocessing (CVPP) on high-dimensional lattices, and settle the open problem of Doulgerakis-Laarhoven-De Weger [PQCrypto, 2019] of determining exact asymptotics on the volume of these Voronoi cells under the Gaussian heuristic. As a result, we obtain improved upper bounds on the time complexity of the randomized iterative slicer when using less than 20.076d+o(d)2^{0.076d + o(d)} memory, and we show how to obtain time-memory trade-offs even when using less than 20.048d+o(d)2^{0.048d + o(d)} memory. We also settle the open problem of obtaining a continuous trade-off between the size of the advice and the query time complexity, as the time complexity with subexponential advice in our approach scales as dd/2+o(d)d^{d/2 + o(d)}, matching worst-case enumeration bounds, and achieving the same asymptotic scaling as average-case enumeration algorithms for the closest vector problem.Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur

    Approximate Algorithms on Lattices with Small Determinant

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we propose approximate lattice algorithms for solving the shortest vector problem (SVP) and the closest vector problem (CVP) on an nn-dimensional Euclidean integral lattice L. Our algorithms run in polynomial time of the dimension and determinant of lattices and improve on the LLL algorithm when the determinant of a lattice is less than 2^{n^2/4}. More precisely, our approximate SVP algorithm gives a lattice vector of size \le 2^{\sqrt{\log\det L}} and our approximate CVP algorithm gives a lattice vector, the distance of which to a target vector is 2^{\sqrt{\log\det L}} times the distance from the target vector to the lattice. One interesting feature of our algorithms is that their output sizes are independent of dimension and become smaller as the determinant of L becomes smaller. For example, if \det L=2^{n \sqrt n}, a short vector outputted from our approximate SVP algorithm is of size 2^{n^{3/4}}, which is asymptotically smaller than the size 2^{n/4+\sqrt n} of the outputted short vectors of the LLL algorithm. It is similar to our approximate CVP algorithm

    New Public-Key Crypto-System EHT

    Get PDF
    In this note, an LWE problem with a hidden trapdoor is introduced. It is used to construct an efficient public-key crypto-system EHT. The new system is significantly different from LWE based NIST candidates like FrodoKEM. The performance of EHT compares favorably with FrodoKEM

    Quantum NV Sieve on Grover for Solving Shortest Vector Problem

    Get PDF
    Quantum computers can efficiently model and solve several challenging problems for classical computers, raising concerns about potential security reductions in cryptography. NIST is already considering potential quantum attacks in the development of post-quantum cryptography by estimating the quantum resources required for such quantum attacks. In this paper, we present quantum circuits for the NV sieve algorithm to solve the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP), which serves as the security foundation for lattice-based cryptography, achieving a quantum speedup of the square root. Although there has been extensive research on the application of quantum algorithms for lattice-based problems at the theoretical level, specific quantum circuit implementations for them have not been presented yet. Notably, this work demonstrates that the required quantum complexity for the SVP in the lattice of rank 70 and dimension 70 is 2432^{43} (a product of the total gate count and the total depth) with our optimized quantum implementation of the NV sieve algorithm. This complexity is significantly lower than the NIST post-quantum security standard, where level 1 is 21572^{157}, corresponding to the complexity of Grover\u27s key search for AES-128

    Finding Shortest Vector Using Quantum NV Sieve on Grover

    Get PDF
    Quantum computers, especially those with over 10,000 qubits, pose a potential threat to current public key cryptography systems like RSA and ECC due to Shor\u27s algorithms. Grover\u27s search algorithm is another quantum algorithm that could significantly impact current cryptography, offering a quantum advantage in searching unsorted data. Therefore, with the advancement of quantum computers, it is crucial to analyze potential quantum threats. While many works focus on Grover’s attacks in symmetric key cryptography, there has been no research on the practical implementation of the quantum approach for lattice-based cryptography. Currently, only theoretical analyses involve the application of Grover\u27s search to various Sieve algorithms. In this work, for the first time, we present a quantum NV Sieve implementation to solve SVP, posing a threat to lattice-based cryptography. Additionally, we implement the extended version of the quantum NV Sieve (i.e., the dimension and rank of the lattice vector). Our extended implementation could be instrumental in extending the upper limit of SVP (currently, determining the upper limit of SVP is a vital factor). Lastly, we estimate the quantum resources required for each specific implementation and the application of Grover\u27s search. In conclusion, our research lays the groundwork for the quantum NV Sieve to challenge lattice-based cryptography. In the future, we aim to conduct various experiments concerning the extended implementation and Grover\u27s search
    corecore