214 research outputs found
Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexity
In this work we analyze the sample complexity of classification by
differentially private algorithms. Differential privacy is a strong and
well-studied notion of privacy introduced by Dwork et al. (2006) that ensures
that the output of an algorithm leaks little information about the data point
provided by any of the participating individuals. Sample complexity of private
PAC and agnostic learning was studied in a number of prior works starting with
(Kasiviswanathan et al., 2008) but a number of basic questions still remain
open, most notably whether learning with privacy requires more samples than
learning without privacy.
We show that the sample complexity of learning with (pure) differential
privacy can be arbitrarily higher than the sample complexity of learning
without the privacy constraint or the sample complexity of learning with
approximate differential privacy. Our second contribution and the main tool is
an equivalence between the sample complexity of (pure) differentially private
learning of a concept class (or ) and the randomized one-way
communication complexity of the evaluation problem for concepts from . Using
this equivalence we prove the following bounds:
1. , where is the Littlestone's (1987)
dimension characterizing the number of mistakes in the online-mistake-bound
learning model. Known bounds on then imply that can be much
higher than the VC-dimension of .
2. For any , there exists a class such that but .
3. For any , there exists a class such that the sample complexity of
(pure) -differentially private PAC learning is but
the sample complexity of the relaxed -differentially private
PAC learning is . This resolves an open problem of
Beimel et al. (2013b).Comment: Extended abstract appears in Conference on Learning Theory (COLT)
201
Order-Revealing Encryption and the Hardness of Private Learning
An order-revealing encryption scheme gives a public procedure by which two
ciphertexts can be compared to reveal the ordering of their underlying
plaintexts. We show how to use order-revealing encryption to separate
computationally efficient PAC learning from efficient -differentially private PAC learning. That is, we construct a concept
class that is efficiently PAC learnable, but for which every efficient learner
fails to be differentially private. This answers a question of Kasiviswanathan
et al. (FOCS '08, SIAM J. Comput. '11).
To prove our result, we give a generic transformation from an order-revealing
encryption scheme into one with strongly correct comparison, which enables the
consistent comparison of ciphertexts that are not obtained as the valid
encryption of any message. We believe this construction may be of independent
interest.Comment: 28 page
- …